Looting vs. Survival, page 5
Pages: <<  2    3    4    5    6    7    8  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 1 times


reply posted on 1-9-2005 @ 11:48 AM by Nygdan
Originally posted by Boondock78
you have to understand that not everyone could leave. some of these people have no transportation, no money, they are not able to travel.

You can walk outta the sunken bowl that is topographical new orleans easily in five days.
where are they gonna go?

Out of the giant, already sinking city and away from the massive, wildly destructive hurricane the size of fance.

they took up shelter in their homes and rode out the storm. now they need to survive.

Everyone is being forced out of the city now, the city itself is being evacuated.

looting diapers, food, water, drink, and even arms i can understand.

Guns? No. that is why they've had to suspend rescue operations, to stop the mobs looting gun stores and armories. They have stopped resucing people from the natural disaster to try to fight the human rampage. These people arenot starving and dying and in need of supplies, its been a few days, and the government is providing shelter, its not like the hurrican picked up the city and transplanted it to Oz.

And they have to fight to survive or something. The city is being evacuated, fema shelters have been set up, looting is illegal and completely unecessary, and they shouldn't be in teh goddamned city anyway, let alone not have built up a stock of absolute necessities.
The kind that can't afford to leave


Everyone can afford to leave. Everyone can walk, get on public buses, hitch a ride, anything. I can understand taking food to survive, but if my situation is that bad then I want the cops to pick me up and bring me to a shelter or holding facility, not be running around a sewage flooded city having to decide whether or not to rush into a gun shop to steal a shot gun to protect myself from roving bands of looters. I'm not Snake Plissken.

Unlike the ordinary people who were just made homeless, killed, bankrupted, and left to fend for themselves in the eye of the storm.

Precisely. Those people have nothing, some peopel managed to still have something, stores that survived the natural destruction. Now those stores are being destroyed by human destruction. Needless human destruction.
But not for the wealthy to remove or secure their valuables?

So let me get this straigh, the middle class (these people aren't poor, some are, lots aren't) doesn't have to leave, and if their stuff gets destroyed, they can take somone elses. But by virtue of having enough sense to get yourself and your family to safety, you have to forfeit your property to the mobs that didn't leave, didn't prepare, and won't go to shelters?
Even emergency centers were evacuated by helicopter.

They are evacuating the city, they are not pointing people to the highways and saying 'walk'. They are moving people to shelters. They were resucing trapped people and moving them to shelters, they stopped that now to deal with rampaging looting mobs.
Your compassion

I make no claims at compassion.
poverty prevents choice. It's called an economic barrier.

These people are not below the poverty line.
In contaminated water?

Boil it and strain it and clean the diapers, at least try it before you break into a store and start stealing stuff, or you could've done the smart thing and prepared.
Then, you presumably would blame her for making her children sick

Lets be clear, if I was in new orleans, and I didn't leave for whatever the reason, and I had kids and I couldn't give them clean diapers without breaking the law, I'd break the law. Lets also be clear, these mobs are not made up of paupers scrambling for milk diapers water and bread while the government does nothing. They are not suspending rescue operations because of mothers stealing powdered formula for thier babies.
More black and white consistency, lacking in compassion and vision

Irrelevant.
Are you ready to threaten the entire nation with child appropriation for non-compliance?

I was being more of a smartass than anything else really. But honestly if she has no supplies for her kids, then she should be picked up and taken to a shelter.
And that book/movie should be mandatory education for everyone living in these times

Jean Val Jean would've strangled the majority of these looters with his massive fists if he were mayor of new orleans. He stole bread, to feed his dying and starving sister. No one is new orleans is starving. No one is eating tvs, jerseys or jewelry.
Can you explain to the citizens of New Orleans precisely how and why this situation is different?

I do not understand that question.
Can you explain why we arrest and incarcerate the little people, but not the rich and powerful?

International politics is power politics, domestic politics is legalistic. What court has jurisdiction over the rich meanies? Without a global government, there is no global legal system, certainly nothing like what we find in the US.

As far as the other thread, I agree, the planning here was miserable, the people didn't leave the city, and the state and federal governments didn't prepare for the disaster, yet again. Now what happens when people are moved into some of those so called 'concentration camps'? Is the government being 'bad' by providing for their necessities while trying to cope with this disaster?

[edit on 1-9-2005 by Nygdan]

[edit on 1-9-2005 by Nygdan]


reply posted on 1-9-2005 @ 12:14 PM by Nygdan
Originally posted by Boondock78
what about the people trapped in the school/ are they shooting? i don't think so. they can make an attempt to rescue them.

Not if there are roving armed mobs. People trapped are in less danger than mobs of armed people shooting everywhere. The people that are rampaging are the peopel that are going to be responsible when those three hundred people die.

fact is there is no good solution for this.

Evacuate the city, quell the mobs by arresting people (not by mowing them down), arrest looters on site and move them to makeshift camps outside of the disaster zones (holding them until the mobs are clamped down on at least). Anyone stealing food is obviously not much of a problem, hold them until the situation is stabilized, pick up their families and hold their families too. Activate the national guardsmen for the state and have other states do the same and flood new orleans with soldiers, groups in every section. Have them seize all foodstuffs and disperse them to the crowds in an orderly manner. Use state license records to get some sort of list to make sure that the food can be rationed properly. Extend the emergency zone to the rest of the state and extend the martial law to other parts of the state, especially anywhere that produces or stores food and clothing, seize and dispurse it. Once everyone that can be evacuated is, and most of the people are in camps receiving food clothing shelter and medicine, start returning property to the property owners and letting people come back to get their stuff, draining the flood waters and rebuilding the city.
Thats the right thing to do. People won't like being told not to steal, people won't like being told where to go, but who cares?


reply posted on 1-9-2005 @ 12:56 PM by Boondock78




i don't wish bad things on anyone and no matter how fast they get in to help these people it won't be fast enough. some of these people though could have helped themselves with food and provisions and instead decided to help themselves to free sh*t


reply posted on 1-9-2005 @ 04:56 PM by dr_strangecraft
Originally posted by GTWill
I am still watching the coverage of this catastrophe. The U.S. government failed to have systems in place before the storm hit. We live in the most powerful nation in the world. We should have the best response time and the most man power. However our own president took 72 hours to even comment on the situation. Too little...Too Late.


XYZ, dude. Your ignorance is showing.

Bush ordered the mobilization of FEMA and national guard units to "standby status," and declared Louisiana a Disaster Area more than 12 hours BEFORE Katrina's LANDFALL. This was only the second time in us history a president has declared a disaster before the event took place.

www.msnbc.msn.com...

It's hilarious to watch people (like you) critique the work of FEMA, redcross, state public safety etc., and accuse them of doing nothing, when in fact, hurricane's force increased 4-fold in less than a 24 hour span.

You hold them to an impossible standard. What you envision would not have been possible without a police state; the govt. would have needed to seize needed supplies under force of arms and evacuate people to "concentration camps" so as to maintain order. And then you'd have cussed 'em for brutality.

Bush also got the EPA to waive gasoline additive restrictions for 3 months, to help make up for production shortfalls. He also sent 40k national guard in, with amphibious vehicles.

BTW, the spokesmodel for the Louisiana State police said on NPR that they are not enforcing "property law" in stricken areas-- they are only intervening where individual live is in danger, otherwise they are focusing on rescuing people. In other words, they aren't stopping looters because they are focused on freeing trapped persons, seniors, isolated children, etc.
Pages: <<  2    3    4    5    6    7    8  >>    ^^TOP^^



San Onofre Ready To Blow Anytime
  Posted 11 days ago with 4 member flags
Japan earthquake in 2012?
  Posted 0 days ago with 1 member flags
Radiation Network 2/2/12 website image not loading
  Posted 11 days ago with 0 member flags