It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Seekerof
Thank you for correcting Stealth Spy, Deino.spewing them as if he has a clue. Apparently he did not read the article in it's entirety that I linked, and simply went into his counter commentary. What is interesting here is that he is from India, is very prideful of the Indian air force, the Indian Government wants the JSF, but yet he posts as he does about it. Stealth Spy means well, though.
Originally posted by American Mad Man
I really don't understand how people can think that Russia will catch up with the US in technology.
Let's just look at it logically:Alright, lets!
1) During the cold war, Russia was consistantly behind. It was proven many times in actual combat and confirmed when the US aquired actual Soviet jets.Actually, during the Cold War, up until the Early, mid 1980's, Russia was actually ahead of the US in many fields of technology. Only at that point, did America actually pass the Soviet Union in terms of technological advancements, the reason being that the Soviet Union began experiencing internal difficulties at that time, which ultimately led to the fall of the Soviet Union in '91.
2) Since the cold war has ended, the US has INCREASED the gap that already existed. The US has spent over 1 TRILLION more dollars on defence over the last decade then Russia has.Now I do doubt that Russia will catch up to the US economically, anytime soon, they just don't have the infrastructure for that, the Soviet Union has fallen and now Russia is left in shambles, the US did not fall, the US still has a good economy, despite there being hardships.
3) In order for Russia to catch up, they would be required to exceed US progress over a period of time untill the gap was closed. In order to do that, they must out spend the US over said period of time.Playing Catch up doesn't mean you have to pass the other person, just means you have to match what they have, and a trillian dollars for Russia is alot a money, on their current budjet, I hope they are spending signifficantly less on defense than a trillian dollars.
4) Russia has no experience in making an operational stealth aircraft. The US has had THREE, one built in the 60's and the other two built in the 80's. Think about that! The SR-71 was already using RAM, RAP, and shaping for stealth 40 years ago. This was refined with the F-117, and perfected with the B-2. The F-117 has been around almost a quarter century and Russia STILL hasn't built a rival!Hmm, I wouldn't go as far as to say Russia has no Experience, because believe me they do have some experience, they did manage to build a replica of the F-117.(Forgot the Designation, but I know they have it, or do they?) And the Russians see RAS as a waste of an AirFrame, and sacrifice RAS stealth for Manueverability, which is why they are working on Plasma Stealth.(Although it isn't really going that far, they have their minds set in the right place)
5) Russia is almost as behind in electronics as it is in stealth. Thier computers are a joke compared with western ones (hence why they are going to Europe for help) and their avionics are behind as well.Western Computers are sold all over the world and thus are easily obtainable, and Japan also does manufacture microchips and technologies of those sorts, you don't know if they have an economy with Russia or not, does anyone know? Now Avionics is a completely different story, it is true that they do not have Stealth as advanced as American stealth, but they do have aircraft as manueverable, however I doubt that manueverability will help against a target your missiles don't even see.
All in all, it is going to take MONEY to catch up to the US. You need to OUTSPEND the US to catch up. There really isn't any way around it. So untill a country can compete with a 400 billion dollar per year military budget, they simply can't catch up. Now this is true, that not many nations are expected to catch up with the US in terms of R&D budjet anytime soon, but the American Economy won't be like this forever, and other economies are improving expodentionally. So there is that to account for.
Originally posted by ShatteredSkies
Prelude, thank you for trying to defend Stealth Spy, but you have misunderstood something, that if Seekrof says something as he has in the previous post, it may very well be right, not because he's a mod, but because he's an intelligent person
and I'm not sure about him being American, he may be British, I don't know, but we do we have Multi-national mods on this forum, so in no way is this an American Dominated forum.
Sorry, it's just that your post really got on my nerves. And before you respond to this with "American Dominated" I'm european, portuguese and I'm apposed to National Domination on subjects, such as you have thought this was an American Dominated Forum, .
Originally posted by Simon666
Actually, if they just wait long enough and spend less, they could eventually come up to a similar level if there is a law of diminishing return concerning technological advances, which is probably so and which will be reached when a number of theoretical performance limits will be reached. You seem to be assuming a linear increase in technology with the amount of money spent, that isn't necessarily so.
Why would Russia even need to, what would they need to use it for? Can't go to war with either the US or China as that would result in nuclear war and that against a bunch of ragtag Chechens armed with AK-47s and RPGs it won't be of much use either.
Originally posted by American Mad Man
. In any case there is no realistic chance for ANY country to catch up with the US without out spending us.
Originally posted by tomcat ha
You cant really compare budgets of countries. If you do you need to know exactly how much things costs in the countries you compare. Otherwise you can say: this country is much better than that country because it spends more while it can be that everything is more expensive.
Originally posted by American Mad Man
The problem with your argument is that by the time Russia had caught up to the US, the US would have moved on to another technology. In any case there is no realistic chance for ANY country to catch up with the US without out spending us.
Originally posted by ShatteredSkies
Someone teach teh_gerbil that it doesn't matter how manueverable the Sukhois are, that they still won't be able to see a squad of raptors come by and shoot them down.
Score 1 for the Raptors, score 0 for Sukhoi.
Shattered OUT...
Originally posted by ShatteredSkies
Someone teach teh_gerbil that it doesn't matter how manueverable the Sukhois are, that they still won't be able to see a squad of raptors come by and shoot them down.
Score 1 for the Raptors, score 0 for Sukhoi.
Shattered OUT...
Originally posted by prelude
even if I believe in your ignorant statement are you sure the sub systems of the Raptor can keep it in air for an hour or two in order to destroy the Sukhoi.....how can you beat a plane in A2A combat when you plane cant even FLY properly? USA basically wasted their money while developing the Raptor
Originally posted by tomcat ha
F15's are old planes. They cant be compared with modern and future russian planes.
F15's are old planes. They cant be compared with modern and future russian planes.