It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: tarifa37
a reply to: Power_Semi
let's be honest it will be the figures of infected and dead that are coming from countries outside China which will be the correct ones and the ones to worry about for most of us. it will be a long time if ever that we find out the correct figures for inside China.
originally posted by: Halfswede
originally posted by: Necrose
BLACK = EXPONENTIAL GROWTH
RED = LINEAR GROWTH
GREEN -- = WHAT WOULD HAVE BEEN AN EXPONENTIAL GROWTH
This is my last post regarding the subject of the exponential growth. It's barely linear. A linear growth would mean we get at least a higher number than yesterday. The number of new cases today is going to be lower than the number of new cases yesterday.
Doh. This is using the data on your plot and fitting it with the exponential curve parameters specified in the tool (circled) using MATLAB. Just keep digging. You simply don't even know what exponential growth means outside of some preconceived notion in your head. FYI, that R-value means it is a good fit btw.
originally posted by: Power_Semi
Doubling time:
From the 21st Jan using official numbers of confirmed cases (21st jan being confirmed total from 20th etc), not accounting for deaths.
21st Jan - less than 2 days
22nd Jan - c.1.5 days
23rd jan - c.1.5 days
24th jan - c.1.5 days
25th jan - c.1.5 days
26th jan - c. 1.5 days
27th jan - c. 1.5 days
28th jan - c.2.5 days
29th jan - c. 3 days
30th jan - c. 3 days
31st jan - c. 4 days
1st feb - c. 4 days
Now you need to be careful how you interpret that.
1) It's slowing down, but that's a heck of a jump from 1.5 to 2.5 in 1 day.
2) You need to consider they might have reached the limited of how many they can test per day - which they have admitted has happened.
3) You have to trust the official numbers.
4) It doesn't count people at home and not officially in the system.
EDIT - today will probably be the double of the 2nd so will be 4 days again.
R is down because. We add less cases. If we continue, we will add less and less case untile r is below 1.
originally posted by: Power_Semi
originally posted by: Necrose
a reply to: Halfswede
What kind of growth would this be then? If what we have now is exponential?
Go and look up what exponential means before you embarras yourself further.
That is friendly advice.
It could bring China to its knee's..
originally posted by: TheAMEDDDoc
a reply to: loam
Speaking of things that can cause seizures, other neurological symptoms, and respiratory problems, do we know what the heck they are spraying? Is it toxic? Viruses are so hard to target with drugs because those drugs would be toxic to the host as well, like cancer treatments.
I don’t think those masks would offer great protection from chemical hazards.
originally posted by: Power_Semi
originally posted by: Necrose
originally posted by: Power_Semi
Doubling time:
From the 21st Jan using official numbers of confirmed cases (21st jan being confirmed total from 20th etc), not accounting for deaths.
21st Jan - less than 2 days
22nd Jan - c.1.5 days
23rd jan - c.1.5 days
24th jan - c.1.5 days
25th jan - c.1.5 days
26th jan - c. 1.5 days
27th jan - c. 1.5 days
28th jan - c.2.5 days
29th jan - c. 3 days
30th jan - c. 3 days
31st jan - c. 4 days
1st feb - c. 4 days
Now you need to be careful how you interpret that.
1) It's slowing down, but that's a heck of a jump from 1.5 to 2.5 in 1 day.
2) You need to consider they might have reached the limited of how many they can test per day - which they have admitted has happened.
3) You have to trust the official numbers.
4) It doesn't count people at home and not officially in the system.
EDIT - today will probably be the double of the 2nd so will be 4 days again.
Oh there you lowkey mentioned it's "SLOWING DOWN" ... ain't that what Necrose been tellin' ya ?
No idiot, I said you have to be careful how you interpret it, that could be one interpretation but it would be the incorrect one.