Corona Virus Updates Part 2

originally posted by: TheAMEDDDoc
a reply to: angelchemuel

Not yet no, maybe in patients with a chronic or genetic disorder. As monoclonal antibodies and DNA based vaccines become more stable in the next few decades, yes you will see these treatments and the ability to cure and treat pretty much any disease. You could also create crap to do whatever you want and change DNA in the target organisms as well so, two sides to that coin.

Thank you for your reply. Please also see my replies to Necrose which will explain why I asked

I have been following your science info behind this carefully as I wanted a better understanding of which systems of the body are mainly affected. There are as I mentioned to Necrose specific Essential Oils which will balance out the blood cell production in the bone marrow, one in particular, same goes for the attack on the protein covering a virus.....some can also attack then the bacteria, and again for clearing the mucous build up.

Rainbows
Jane

Frank Plummer, former head of the National Microbiology Lab in Canada, dead at 67. He worked at the lab where virus sample was stolen. He was a HIV specialist.

he university said his best-known research “unraveled the mystery” over a group of Kenyan women who were naturally immune to HIV by looking into their immune systems and genetics for answers. Plummer’s work laid a foundation for subsequent interventions, and was used to guide vaccine and drug development.

He won many awards during his career, for his research into HIV transmission and for providing leadership at the National Microbiology Lab during the SARS outbreak, including the Canada Gairdner Wightman Award in 2016. He was also at the helm of the lab during Ebola scares and during the 2009 H1N1 pandemic.

This sudden death is a concidence ?!


CTV News

originally posted by: Necrose

originally posted by: ARM1968
Err, no it isn’t. Even the skewed official figures show its going up. a reply to: Necrose

I don't know man, I feel stupid explaining elementary school maths, simply put : a daily increase in % is declining, hence it's slowing down.

You’re an idiot. Sorry to break it to you, as you’re clearly unaware. Enjoy.

I'm not as worried as I was at 1st we are still siting 11 here in the US doesn't seem to be as prolific as 1st thought if it was I'm sure those 11 cases would have infected 3 times fold .

a reply to: Power_Semi

Use your own brains and gut feelings and watch what happens over the next 2 weeks in the West. 

I've already planned and got my stuff sorted so it no longer matters to me, I'm not coming back here to argue the same glaringly obvious points over and over again. 

I'm almost right there with you.

I have upped some preps and I am currently in a standby to take drastic measures to ensure the safety of my family, as much as I can anyways, if needed.

I operate under the idea if the government puppets tell me not to panic and it will be ok, then it is seriously time to pay attention because the big rotten "nothing burger" could be contaminated.

I am currently deciding on what my next acquisition will be for this week.

a reply to: burdman30ott6

WoW!!! Considering the USA has around 329 million total people.

Think I've learned more about China in the past few weeks than what little I've known in past 20 years.

Found an interesting interactive chart on some of the data about the virus.

Might help understand ahem the virus better.


coronainfo.xyz...

originally posted by: ARM1968

originally posted by: Necrose

originally posted by: ARM1968
Err, no it isn’t. Even the skewed official figures show its going up. a reply to: Necrose

I don't know man, I feel stupid explaining elementary school maths, simply put : a daily increase in % is declining, hence it's slowing down.

You’re an idiot. Sorry to break it to you, as you’re clearly unaware. Enjoy.

Ok let's say hypothetically...
Today's increase is going to be 18% and the rate by which the number of confirmed cases increases is declining 1% per day.
Tomorrow 17%, then 16, 15, 14 and in 2 weeks it hits 0%, so 18 days from now the daily increase is going to be 0% = 0 new cases. What then? It has to top out at some point if it's not speeding up, but slowing down.

Instead of saying I'm an idiot, show me what's wrong with my calculations so both of us can be "aware".

EDIT: again, we're using China's officially reported numbers

We all knew this was coming... cruise ship

BREAKING: Multiple people with coronavirus on cruise ship off Yokohama, Japan; 10 people taken to hospital - NHK
twitter.com...

a reply to: Necrose

I don’t think your an idiot. What percentage of error are you applying to your calculations in regards to communism, and current conditions in the hubei province? Over crowded hospitals, fear to leave your home etc. reports of running out of testing kits etc. people dying before being tested etc.

I don’t think it’s declining I think it’s expanding or spreading, but I respect you being here thou to keep me hoping. 👍

originally posted by: Necrose

originally posted by: Bicent
Serious and critical cases are at about 13%. At this present time. Also most of the fatalities are in hubei 🤷‍♂️ 479 out of 492??

Source my math.

And 80% of deaths are people above 60.
2/3 are men

And of those 80% around 77% were people with clinical history with diseases such as diabetis, asthma, etc... Source=my girlfriend nurse at Macau 😘

Sadly I think I'm coming to grips with the fact that regardless of how long this virus has been present in other countries, we will STILL only get to see the information/numbers that the mouthpieces of governments are allowed to tell us.

Like we've seen with many disasters and questionable events over the past half century we can only take the information being given to us OFFICIALLY, as well as our own rational thought process and those few & far between insiders or experts willing to share additional details and we will still only have SOME of the picture, with major puzzle pieces missing and only speculated about.

That being said, I think most of us are in agreement that monitoring the situation and "official" data we have access too here in the West and EU will provide somewhat better predictions than the "official" data coming out of China.

Have I missed anything?

originally posted by: Necrose

originally posted by: ARM1968

originally posted by: Necrose

originally posted by: ARM1968
Err, no it isn’t. Even the skewed official figures show its going up. a reply to: Necrose

I don't know man, I feel stupid explaining elementary school maths, simply put : a daily increase in % is declining, hence it's slowing down.

You’re an idiot. Sorry to break it to you, as you’re clearly unaware. Enjoy.

Ok let's say hypothetically...
Today's increase is going to be 18% and the rate by which the number of confirmed cases increases is declining 1% per day.
Tomorrow 17%, then 16, 15, 14 and in 2 weeks it hits 0%, so 18 days from now the daily increase is going to be 0% = 0 new cases. What then? It has to top out at some point if it's not speeding up, but slowing down.

Instead of saying I'm an idiot, show me what's wrong with my calculations so both of us can be "aware".

EDIT: again, we're using China's officially reported numbers

I think the infection rate increased today. It's around a 22% increase thus far today.

I could be wrong though, just going off memory what the numbers were yesterday.

originally posted by: EndtheMadnessNow
We all knew this was coming... cruise ship

BREAKING: Multiple people with coronavirus on cruise ship off Yokohama, Japan; 10 people taken to hospital - NHK
twitter.com...

So they have test kits onboard that could take a precise diagnosis or is it only a precautionary manouver? If sometimes we need several days and tests to get a real result how do they get it so fast here?

originally posted by: Necrose

originally posted by: ARM1968

originally posted by: Necrose

originally posted by: ARM1968
Err, no it isn’t. Even the skewed official figures show its going up. a reply to: Necrose

I don't know man, I feel stupid explaining elementary school maths, simply put : a daily increase in % is declining, hence it's slowing down.

You’re an idiot. Sorry to break it to you, as you’re clearly unaware. Enjoy.

Ok let's say hypothetically...
Today's increase is going to be 18% and the rate by which the number of confirmed cases increases is declining 1% per day.
Tomorrow 17%, then 16, 15, 14 and in 2 weeks it hits 0%, so 18 days from now the daily increase is going to be 0% = 0 new cases. What then? It has to top out at some point if it's not speeding up, but slowing down.

Instead of saying I'm an idiot, show me what's wrong with my calculations so both of us can be "aware".

EDIT: again, we're using China's officially reported numbers

Which pretty much everyone knows are wrong, so your argument is what exactly? If you want to construct a platform on the quicksand of the official figures go right ahead, it just proves what I said. It’s not about scoring points, downplaying or oneupmanship, it’s about something catastrophic happening in China right now to real people and the likelihood that it could impact us globally just as severely. It is inexplicable to me that anyone can see how China is reacting to this and clearly not understand its magnitude. If you really are a pharmacist then you should know better.

Link[ editby]edit on 4-2-2020 by ARM1968 because: (no reason given)