It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Give up what? Calling you out? I think you need to calm down, when you start resorting to "Stupid" you've clearly lost the argument and there is no further point in engaging with you, I may push the letter, but won't push that point.
originally posted by: Jay-morris
a reply to: Arnie123
Yay, more nonsense! What a mouthful, I'm not sure what you're asking other than being unhinged and further making a mockery of this thread, lol.
And yet you cannot back up me calling Trump supporters Nazis! Please, give up before you make yourself look even more stupid!
originally posted by: Arnie123
...and for everything you just posted resulted in comitting the same fallace, great job illustrating your point.
originally posted by: bastion
a reply to: Arnie123
When you clutter up the thread with nonsense and patently false allegations, people are going to comment on it. That's how bulletin boards work.
I fail to see how posting 'do you social media bruh?' on page 3 is an objective or critical analysis of something Trump has done.
ATS is a website, not just this thread. Trying to constrain the goalposts to this microcosm to make it seem like you have a point is again due to logical fallacy (reductio ad absurdium), lack of reading comprehension or deliberately misinterpreting posts to make it seem you have a valid argument.
I think I made it clear in my last post, but since you continue to engage, I'll say it again, practice what you preach and if you haven't made anything contribution to the source material then our discussion is done.
Ugh, annnd you're still here.
originally posted by: bastion
originally posted by: Arnie123
...and for everything you just posted resulted in comitting the same fallace, great job illustrating your point.
originally posted by: bastion
a reply to: Arnie123
When you clutter up the thread with nonsense and patently false allegations, people are going to comment on it. That's how bulletin boards work.
I fail to see how posting 'do you social media bruh?' on page 3 is an objective or critical analysis of something Trump has done.
ATS is a website, not just this thread. Trying to constrain the goalposts to this microcosm to make it seem like you have a point is again due to logical fallacy (reductio ad absurdium), lack of reading comprehension or deliberately misinterpreting posts to make it seem you have a valid argument.
I think I made it clear in my last post, but since you continue to engage, I'll say it again, practice what you preach and if you haven't made anything contribution to the source material then our discussion is done.
Not it didn't. Look up the definition of reducing to the absurd instead of re-itterating my point you lack reading comprehension. Plus a phallus is very different than a fallacy.
I think you nailed it perfectly and I agree.
originally posted by: namehere
i mean unless these psychiatrists are personally examining him and talking to him on a regular basis, they are talking out of their asses and are a joke to their profession and just doing this for money. just another example of the systemic corruption plaguing this country.
originally posted by: Arnie123
I think you nailed it perfectly and I agree.
originally posted by: namehere
i mean unless these psychiatrists are personally examining him and talking to him on a regular basis, they are talking out of their asses and are a joke to their profession and just doing this for money. just another example of the systemic corruption plaguing this country.
Sure, Trumps been evaluated by physicians, but we're talking about people trying to make assessments over the air and that doesn't resonate with people because what if we are put into that position?
originally posted by: gortex
originally posted by: Arnie123
I think you nailed it perfectly and I agree.
originally posted by: namehere
i mean unless these psychiatrists are personally examining him and talking to him on a regular basis, they are talking out of their asses and are a joke to their profession and just doing this for money. just another example of the systemic corruption plaguing this country.
So you'd by happy for all future Presidents to have a psychological assessment along with their physical assessment before hey take the reigns of power ?
Ye, I forgot about that, guilty as charged.
originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: namehere
This reminds of that time when Hillary started having health issues and everyone rushed out to diagnose her, and the same people worried about Trump's mental state based on armchair diagnosis now told us how shoddy and wrong the same kind of diagnosis was back then.
Unless we get something from someone who knows (not an Adam Schiff style whistleblower who overheard someone talking to someone who might have heard something), then this is conjecture and Monday morning quarterbacking akin to what Patriots' fans are likely doing.
originally posted by: Arnie123
Sure, Trumps been evaluated by physicians, but we're talking about people trying to make assessments over the air and that doesn't resonate with people because what if we are put into that position?
originally posted by: gortex
originally posted by: Arnie123
I think you nailed it perfectly and I agree.
originally posted by: namehere
i mean unless these psychiatrists are personally examining him and talking to him on a regular basis, they are talking out of their asses and are a joke to their profession and just doing this for money. just another example of the systemic corruption plaguing this country.
So you'd by happy for all future Presidents to have a psychological assessment along with their physical assessment before hey take the reigns of power ?
Technically we already do just by posting in online forum interactions, people make all kinds of diagnosis, mainly partisan in nature.
It's madness.
originally posted by: markovian
originally posted by: Arnie123
Sure, Trumps been evaluated by physicians, but we're talking about people trying to make assessments over the air and that doesn't resonate with people because what if we are put into that position?
originally posted by: gortex
originally posted by: Arnie123
I think you nailed it perfectly and I agree.
originally posted by: namehere
i mean unless these psychiatrists are personally examining him and talking to him on a regular basis, they are talking out of their asses and are a joke to their profession and just doing this for money. just another example of the systemic corruption plaguing this country.
So you'd by happy for all future Presidents to have a psychological assessment along with their physical assessment before hey take the reigns of power ?
Technically we already do just by posting in online forum interactions, people make all kinds of diagnosis, mainly partisan in nature.
People who think like this do not care about what happens to themselves
It's the same mindset as a suicide bomber just on a much larger scale
originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: TrueAmerican
How many American universities are there with psychology professors. Think about that.
An estimated 106,500 psychologists possess current licenses in the United States. California (17,890) New York (12,020) and Pennsylvania (5,620) have the most licensed psychologists, while Wyoming (170), South Dakota (190) and Alaska (190) have the fewest.
originally posted by: TrueAmerican
originally posted by: 1337Kph
I know TrueAmerican wont answer this.. But.. How many of them had him as their patient? Yeah.
Think u better try DNC forums with this bs.
The article explains the answer to that clearly. He is probably the most public figure in the world at this point. A diagnosis is easlily made in his case with endless publicity following him everywhere. That said, the Goldwater rule states that it is unethical to give a professional opinion about public figures whom they have not examined in person, and from whom they have not obtained consent to discuss their health in public. And they all know this. That in itself says something, that all these people would would risk all those years of study, and their practice, to come forward with such statements. And that is the point.