It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Vitchilo
Well great article Glyph_D. But the guy who wrote it thinks that democrats will save the situation... well I guess he's not totally awake... And he praise Kucinich... Kucinich the guy who wants to BAN all handguns and put several restrictions on all other firearms... yeah that Kucinich.
Originally posted by Roth Joint
If you want to hang on to the thought that innocent, unarmed and defenseless men, women, children, elderly, mentally and/or physically disabled are being shot to death on a weekly base in the US, that's fine. But you and I know that's not true. However, taser deaths are everywhere.
ok dipsh*t what did police do to a low threat suspect before tasers came around??? they used actual police work and procedures.
? Go to any major city....the people there would chew you up and spit you out if you claimed something like that.
But I will say, that seeing you guys claim there are more (innocent) taser deaths than gun deaths by the police is by far one of the most ridiculous things I have ever read on this website in the 3 or 4 or however many years I've been here.
Originally posted by Vitchilo
I say that the odds of going to nuclear war have just risen, thanks to NATO. Mutual Destruction Danger In US Anti-Missile Plan Says Putin
ThatsJustWeird has just added you to their respected foe list
Originally posted by Glyph_D
LOL i just noticed
ThatsJustWeird has just added you to their respected foe list
WOOT im going places now
Originally posted by ThatsJustWeird
I think I took it off, does it still say that?
Originally posted by Glyph_D
hey ... could you give me a link to your proof? and it cannot be just some guy getting shot by a police officer. it must be a situation where a police officer was supposed to use a taser (under his regulation code of his department), but instaed used a firearm, and killed the person.
i havent heard to many stories like that, maybe 2-3(maybe).
18. Yes, I think the New World Order idea tried to establish itself. I would consider them the combination of the old U.S. federal system, Europe, Canada and Australia.
There is a civil war in the United States that starts in 2005. That conflict flares up and down for 10 years.
Originally posted by Vitchilo
So it's exactly what's happening now. The NWO agenda is being carried out in the US, Europe, Canada and Australia... Note also that JT say old US federal system ... NAU.
Also, TJW, don't you think that CPS taking kids for little reasons like the parents not wearing their seatbelts is something really disturbing? That CPS abuse most children they get? There's HUNDRED of cases of that, yet it doesn't make the main-stream news, it's ABUSE OF CHILDRENS, and it doesn't make news... what does that teach you about your government and the news?
Originally posted by ThatsJustWeird
I will go over the above quote however. Because this is hillarious. First we're talking about innocent deaths now all of a sudden since you can't find info to back your statements up, you switch it to deaths where tasers should have been used but firearms were used instead.
Typical tactic.
Anyway, why do you need a link? I'm very sure you've heard of innocents being shot as some of these are very high profile cases which recieve national attention (like last year when that groom was killed. One of SEVERAL high profile cases from New York alone. And remember during Katrina? - and don't forget the Cincinnati riot a couple years ago didn't start for nothing.)
Seriously though, to get all of the non high profile cases, your best bet will be to just go to any major city and look at the local news or read the local section of their newspaper.
The Jewish population in Israel is not prepared for a true offensive war. They are prepared for the ultimate defense. Wavering western support for Israel is what gives Israel's neighbors the confidence to attack.
Originally posted by Glyph_D
im not following you, why was my point a bad tactic?
there is a distinct difference between knowing the suspect is dangerous and thinking hes dangerous. at the same time there is a difference knowing a suspect is harmless and thinking they are harmless.
My "Typical Tactic" was addressing the issue and not allowing you to mess it up.
as was stated by Roth there are more taser related "deaths to innocent and defenseless people across the state" compared to firearms of the same nature.
So far I haven’t heard of any innocent and defenseless US citizen shot to death by his/her officer of the law…. Not one! But tasered to death….. many!
Originally posted by Where2Hide2006
CBS (the company with the all seeing eye logo) has a show called "Jericho"
You can watch all previous episodes in their entirety (commercial free) on the CBS website.
TJW
Roth simply stated innocent and defenseless. Period. Not similar situations or "of the same nature" or whatever you're trying to change it too (that's the typical tactic - trying to change things to fit your views). Innocent and defenseless. Period.
Originally posted by syrinx high priest
UPDATE
another month has turned on the calendar. You know the drill, any takers this time ?
Originally posted by Glyph_D
well again it appears you have failed to comprehend what innocent or defenseless means.
im in total agree'ance with Roth on this i havent heard one "truly innocent" person being shot to death by a cop. now does that mean there has never been an incident like this?? no , it means ive never heard of one. bbefore you try to coin be as being incompetent or being a victim of selective awareness
Originally posted by ThatsJustWeird
No YOU fail to comprehend what innocent and defenseless means.
Innocent - meaning not guilty. Did nothing wrong.
Defenseless - meaning just that...defenseless. No weapons. No threat.
Then again, you're either living under a rock or you're a f'ing idiot.
I just gave a few perfect examples. All of whom where 100% innocent and 100% defenseless. Any suggestion otherwise is beyond stupid.
By your ridiculous standards, then that would also mean there hasn't been one "truly innocent" person ever tasered. Why would the police even pull out the taser if the person was not a threat? Why would the police even be there??