It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


-@TH3WH17ERABB17- -Q- Questions. White House Insider's postings -PART- -§19§-

page: 178
<< 175  176  177    179  180  181 >>

log in


posted on Aug, 13 2019 @ 10:05 AM
a reply to: onehuman

It is possible that Chandler is considered a victim (she was at first) and was given leniency for her later complicity in return for information/testimony.

posted on Aug, 13 2019 @ 10:06 AM
a reply to: PioneerFigureSkating


What do you mean by "3"? I vaguely recall reading something somewhere about that.

posted on Aug, 13 2019 @ 10:09 AM

originally posted by: RelSciHistItSufi
I've been thinking about one of cranky's posts the other day... something like "We are being weaned off Q like a mother making chicks fly the nest".

For "We The People" to be self-sufficient in finding and propagating truth, in the absence of MSM, we need to be able to route fact findings quickly around the planet.

1) Conspiracy theorists are generally bad at sharing anything but the juiciest of investigated facts,
2) Any individual can not discern truth if there is a scarcity of data points to judge on,
3) Most of us only post/share information on 1 or 2 sites.

Route to solution:
1) We need to build a spider-web of communications that increases the depth and speed of information sharing,
2) This might follow the same logic as deep state used to share data between MSM, FBI, DOJ - see Q1515.

What could make it work:
1) Change our mind sets to posting findings on a minimum of 3 sites? Many would be too lazy... but a software tool that allowed us to post to multiple sites with one "send" would help? (Would this be seen as an E-bot?)
2) A truly independent search that captured all our inputs and categorised it into relevant buckets on a global database based on nouns or keywords included?

1) Would this evolve into materialising a reality based on global majority input?

1) Could the methods used by deep state for control become the methods utilised by the people to take back control? (Spider web, information "molecules" instead of "cells", E-bots, search algorithms)

Q said to do what your good at

Was re-posting to 7 site before
now down to 4 got suspended on the 3 other LOL

posted on Aug, 13 2019 @ 10:16 AM
Keep in mind that all of the attempts to silence Q, Awakening, etc, are designed to show up in the voting booth. POTUS Trump threw a huge monkey wrench in the plan.

The desperation is elevating as the DS recognizes 2020 is looking good for POTUS. That makes them dangerous; more than normal.

Epstein was going to bring down Tier I Dems and we see what that resulted in.

If ANY of the 2020 Dems landed in the White House, they would be ultimate puppets. No resistance or pushback to DS/Swamp. Complicit.

POTUS Trump is a Black Swan event. Will it carry into 2024? Who takes the baton?

posted on Aug, 13 2019 @ 10:17 AM
a reply to: SilentWindofDoom

Adding on what others mentioned...

The FBI can go to nearly any place in the world especially when their investigation involves terrorism, HVT fugitives, kidnappings, high dollar cyber crime or high value Art theft.

Despite its domestic focus, the FBI also maintains a significant international footprint, operating 60 Legal Attache (LEGAT) offices and 15 sub-offices in U.S. embassies and consulates across the globe. These foreign offices exist primarily for the purpose of coordination with foreign security services and do not usually conduct unilateral operations in the host countries. The FBI can and does at times carry out secret activities overseas, just as the CIA has a limited domestic function; these activities generally require coordination across government agencies.

posted on Aug, 13 2019 @ 10:19 AM
a reply to: Diaspar

I found the stone statue to the right of the office window, on Epstein Island, interesting in that video so I blew it up and adjusted contrast:

Comparing with the carving in the Loevre museum, below, it looks to be the goddess INNANA a.k.a. ISHTAR:

Inanna is an ancient Mesopotamian goddess associated with love, beauty, sex, desire, fertility, war, justice, and political power. She was originally worshipped in Sumer and was later worshipped by the Akkadians, Babylonians, and Assyrians under the name Ishtar. She was known as the "Queen of Heaven" and was the patron goddess of the Eanna temple at the city of Uruk, which was her main cult center. She was associated with the planet Venus and her most prominent symbols included the lion and the eight-pointed star.

The cult of Inanna-Ishtar, which may have been associated with a variety of sexual rites, was continued by the East Semitic-speaking people who succeeded the Sumerians in the region.

edit on 13-8-2019 by RelSciHistItSufi because: (no reason given)

edit on 13-8-2019 by RelSciHistItSufi because: (no reason given)

posted on Aug, 13 2019 @ 10:30 AM
a reply to: butcherguy

Yes I would think that would be very possible. Except I would also think that at some point Im sure she had many chances to walk away and spill the beans. So she kind of has a pro and con against her.

posted on Aug, 13 2019 @ 10:38 AM
a reply to: dashen

Note the date.

posted on Aug, 13 2019 @ 10:42 AM
a reply to: RelSciHistItSufi

The picture still shows in the article for me, rel, but the article is very slow to load for whatever reason. Odd.

Anyways, I'm on mobile today and busy. If need be I'll take the time to load the pic into this thread directly later this afternoon. (Thanks again for the tutorial)

posted on Aug, 13 2019 @ 10:42 AM
a reply to: EndtheMadnessNow

I hate that ass. He thinks because he came out of the closet people care about his opinions.


posted on Aug, 13 2019 @ 10:45 AM
a reply to: CanadianMason

Eh, it's just supposedly some "secret order" type organization that's been at odds with your group for awhile now. I was just wondering if you had any insight. Don't worry about it. Just trying to satisfy my curiosity about some stuff.

posted on Aug, 13 2019 @ 10:53 AM

originally posted by: dashen
Lol. Get a load of this guy

Donald J. Trump
Would Chris Cuomo be given a Red Flag for his recent rant? Filthy language and a total loss of control. He shouldn’t be allowed to have any weapon. He’s nuts!
10:04 AM · Aug 13, 2019

Plus he went right in and called him Fredo. Gotta love that.

If only wars were fought on Twitter, Trump would rule the world.

posted on Aug, 13 2019 @ 10:55 AM
a reply to: pavil

Twitter version of 'Hunger Games' 🤣

posted on Aug, 13 2019 @ 11:03 AM
a reply to: SouthernGift

Will the Epstein thing turn out to be some sort of actual conspiracy theory admitted to, in the end, by official narrative/MSM, but that was planned as a catalyst to do damage control?

I have a theory like that for JFK. They allowed for conspiracy around only a shooter scenario: The grassy knoll, third gunman, gunshots, the magic bullet.... All to keep our eyes looking from outside the car to find the killer or killers with guns. We never question the person sitting closest to him when we see his head explode..... I’ll stop there.

But yes the media likes to play into the conspiracy theorists hands and we unknowingly help them with their slight of hand to protect their trick.
edit on 13-8-2019 by Observationalist because: Changed from conspirist to conspiracy theorists

edit on 13-8-2019 by Observationalist because: Grammar

posted on Aug, 13 2019 @ 11:12 AM

originally posted by: SouthernGift

originally posted by: butcherguy

originally posted by: PokeyJoe
a reply to: butcherguy

Hey man, dont take my reply the wrong way, you didnt write the article. No personal attack from me. its just that the NY Times has lost ALL credibility in this space, and they have absolutely no room to talk about anybody believing any kind of conspiracy theory, considering they are responsible for the largest, most perverse conspiracy theory out there right now.

I didn't take it as an attack on me, and I definitely agree that the NYT IS crap.
I think it is a bit of a switch for them to tell people to view things with an open mind and admit that the Russian thing (in regards to Trump) was baseless.
I think they are aware that there will be info coming out that will make them look even sillier than they already do and they are trying to get ahead of it.

Hmmmm, I’m sensing a theme here.

Was the pervasive unraveling of the “conspiracy theorists are not credible” beginning to spin so quickly, that the DS/powers of darkness used Epstein and our highly anticipated “suicide” outcome as a way to perhaps, how can I best articulate this......

Double agent us, in a sense, and create a conspiracy theory out of the situation, as to try and gain a handle on the narrative again? Is this a conspiracy, or is this a targeted, promoted, created to be a conspiracy theory from the very beginning, trap?

Will the Epstein thing turn out to be some sort of actual conspiracy theory admitted to, in the end, by official narrative/MSM, but that was planned as a catalyst to do damage control?

Just throwing a thought out there. Let the wind take it where it is meant to be blown, even if that’s down the toilet.

Using the phrase "conspiracy theory" is a problem. It is a C_A creation designed to discredit, so it can NEVER be used in a favorable way. Can "racist" be used in a favorable way? How about "dictator"? The term shows up then the entire point is destroyed, as the effort is a trap. If the phrase shows up it deconstructs the the piece on itself

The next problem with the assessment is in the linear phase via these pieces. Q is not linear - period, even though we work to make it fit that model as programmed into our head. I get why folks have to asses it this way, or debunk it, or even experience it, but not rising to the level it operates at is a problem. I doubt debunkers would be allowed into Raytheon to debunk the physics of a black op project with no knowledge of physics at all.

The writer/debunkers have a very narrow POV and then deeper limitations on word length, research length, and agenda - and in the end it is just opinion. So their POV is only going to appeal to the narrow POV at best, with designs on narrow that POV even more, not expanding it.

The next problem is the folks writing are given the task of Polarity Point. No matter if Q is God and Jesus as depicted they'd be debunked via the forced need to Polarity Point them. This is going to be a huge problem on scale, as the polarity points are breaking apart for many, including Q folks.

posted on Aug, 13 2019 @ 11:12 AM
a reply to: Observationalist

"Follow the wives"... and Ill stop there

posted on Aug, 13 2019 @ 11:30 AM
Another NYPD suicide. This makes 8.

posted on Aug, 13 2019 @ 11:38 AM
a reply to: cherokeetroy


posted on Aug, 13 2019 @ 11:42 AM

Another perv in handcuffs... "Broadway producer Ben Sprecher — the man behind the failed musical “Rebecca” — was arrested early Tuesday on charges of possession of child pornography"


Sprecher, 65, was picked up by the feds around 6 a.m. at his home on West 122nd Street in Morningside Heights, which agents were searching, the sources said. The case was brought by Homeland Security Investigations in conjunction with the NYPD.


posted on Aug, 13 2019 @ 11:47 AM
Agree with your assessment, what I find most difficult, is having others conceptualize the 40,000 ft POV, as most seem to be getting stuck on a detail that they can’t process, doesn’t matter which specific detail, but as they say, “the Devil is in the details”

I posted this on a main Epstein thread where I noticed members stepping outside of the box and beginning to conceptualize what is so difficult to put into words for me, in this thread- and I thought some here might be interested to read as well.

There’s a metaphysical, other worldly, quantum, 40,000 foot point of view I’ve gotten here, and before I come crashing back to the earth, I feel compelled to have others ride the helicopter with me....just briefly - it’s not somewhere we are meant to stay.

To give an excellent example I have used in the past:

Imagine you are watching a parade. Your point of view, is determined by your position in the town. Depending on where you choose to park and chill for the parade viewing, or where you ended up, say, your first choice of a spot was taken... doesn’t matter- point is you will only have a linear view of the parade. As you’re seeing one part of it, others at different points in the town are seeing the floats and signs you have already had pass you by; while some have seen already what you haven’t; even as a participant in the parade, you’ve got a uniquely individual viewpoint. We can meet up and talk about our experiences after it’s over, sharing viewpoints, and so on, etc. we can even walk around during the thing to try and get different perspectives- but until you get out of this “town” completely, you’re still going to have an awfully difficult time piecing together the parade as a whole...

But now imagine an entirely different way to view this same parade. you take a trip in a helicopter and you view that same parade experience from 40,000 ft.

You see the beginning, the middle, the end, all at once. You can even see them assembling the parade before it started, and the dismantling and cleanup process- should you stay up long enough- and get there at the right time.

In this physical plane, I don’t think we have the ability to watch the whole thing from the 40,000 ft viewpoint - that would be how the creator I keep mentioning views this- outside of time... outside of physical barriers and obstacles preventing the full experience-

But there’s a way to conceptualize that viewpoint and experience it in brief instances.... and what you take away from that viewpoint, helps you to see the reality of what passes you by as you are watching the parade pass by your particular place on the street....

Now once you make it to that POV, which can be dangerous as hell (you’re human and if the helicopter malfunctions, shot down, etc- well damn) and that’s what I mean by saying it’s risky, it’s something you can’t un-see, or un-know, you must use discernment, you must realize that being able to understand things from 40,000 ft changes you, and reconcile that how you will, but I don’t think any of this will ever make sense, unless you take the chance and get in that helicopter 🚁

does anybody feel me? Q’s 40,000 ft view post , you know that long one that’s got all the princess Diana, Saudi royal family, +++ etc al- that’s what hooked me into this thread-

And not because I’m a gullible conspiracy theorist.

Because long before Q came about, I had gotten a glimpse of that view

When you’ve seen it, you recognize others that have seen it, as well.

Hope I made sense. I always worry that I alternate between making sense and sounding like I’m drunk.

Thanks for trying to help me explain, Cranky, you’re much more articulate than I!

a reply to: crankyoldman

edit on 13-8-2019 by SouthernGift because: (no reason given)

new topics

top topics

<< 175  176  177    179  180  181 >>

log in