It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Bloodworth
Trump is really trying hard to protect Americans.
While the democratic model is that it's ok if a few citizens are killed if you help thousands of others
originally posted by: abe froman
a reply to: okrian
As a Democrat you should remember that Obama set the precedent when he used executive orders like royal decrees.
You guys were all about letting a Democrat president have all the power without considering what would happen when someone else took the reigns.
Short sighted fuzzy thinking at it's finest.
This is the bed Democrats made.
Too late to whine about it now.
originally posted by: Sookiechacha
originally posted by: Masterjaden
a reply to: Sookiechacha
That's the most idiotic piece of tripe I've seen.
Or constitution calls for military to be used to protect our border much more than it does to fight wars half way across the world.
He absolutely should declare a national emergency. It has been a national emergency for decades now and no one has done Jack about it. Enough is enough, it's time to do something about it.
Jaden
We are not a war with Mexico, like Israel is with Palestine.
A wall simply is not the answer the answer to the refugee crisis at the southern border. It's inhumane, immoral, terrible for the environment, expensive to build and even more expensive to maintain, It's ineffective, as people can still go over, under or around a wall.
Trump doesn't even have a plan, know exactly where the wall will go, filed for eminent domain from American property owners, have a wall design or any environmental impact statements, because he doesn't have a wall design yet!
This whole thing is a national farce, the president's petulant demands, the government shut down, the American people being held hostage, the filth, the economic ramification, the airports at risk, and TSA agents not being paid and calling in sick by the hundreds, airport controllers not being paid.
originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: TheRedneck
We all notice just fine and ken the people responsible for our way of life and level of existence.
And yet cannot seem to present an alternative or solution to defeat or remove the vermin from the power behind the curtain.
Nor are we able to even begin to perceive or address the real bastards responsible for the socio-economic predicament of the whole planet.
originally posted by: 0zzymand0s
It's literally the Jade Helm this site was up in arms over a few years ago, complete with imminent domain seizures of private property along the border in Texas.
The stupid is the gift that keeps on giving 24/7.
originally posted by: Bhadhidar
a reply to: TheRedneck
“We have the means to prevent murders from those coming into the country illegally by not letting them come into the country illegally. We do not have that capability for US citizens.”
Is that really the basis of the argument you want to support? Are you sure?
Let’s use that logic:
We have the means to prevent the murder of innocent Americans, by their fellow citizens, due to gun violence, by outlawing the private owner ship of guns and confiscating all privately held guns, as an imminent threat to national security under the auspices of a National Emergency.
(Please note that I DO NOT support such a measure; I think it would be stupid, unconstitutional, and wholly ineffective)
Thus we could prevent those gun-related death by the simple fact that there are no guns available to commit murders with.
Yeah, that’ll work.
Just as a large portion of the illegal immigration problem stems not from our southern border, but from our major airports; the result of “visitors” and “students” overstaying their visas. (Weren’t the perpetrators of the 9/11 attack here on visas? I don’t remember hearing anything about any of them hiking illegally into the US from Mexico)
And, even if we concede that such a draconian measure wouldn’t prevent All murders (perhaps not even all gun-based mutders) from occurring, should we therefore not make the attempt to prevent even the few deaths we could?
As you argued, do their deaths mean less because they are merely the few?
The same could be applied to deaths resulting from opioid addiction. Americans dying at the hands of other Americans (their suppliers), and in far greater numbers, each year (per the NIH), than have died at the hands of illegal immigrants in a quarter century.
We could prevent those needless deaths by tougher control of the pharmaceutical companies producing and distributing those drugs by the tons, but a wall/fence is more urgent?
So, it seems we DO have the “capability “ to actually prevent the needless deaths of Americans by other Americans, by methods arguably as effective (or ineffective) as this storied “wall”, but we simply refuse to implement those methods, for a variety of arguably valid (or invalid) reasons.
What else you got?
originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: hopenotfeariswhatweneed
I would suggest the likes of ISIS, North Korea, and a right good few spurious others, are laughing their arses off right now at the prospect of the big boy on the block attempting to emulate the fall of Rome
originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: Carcharadon
That may be but tell it to one of our American cousins.
I'm all safe and snug across the pond, our main concern being Brexit right now not stupid nonsensical walls, nor hollow promises from senile politicians intend on national self-destruction. We have our own brand of bull crap to contend with. LoL
It's a stupid scenario which could have some rather far-reaching repercussions, that's a given.