Hackers stole 18,000 documents related to 9/11; are releasing them as their ransoms aren't met

originally posted by: bknapple32

originally posted by: Iconic
a reply to: bknapple32

If anyone has downloaded said file, and has been able to unlock the documents that have been released, I'd like to look through them.

I’m highly interested in these email attachments. They claim juicy. So let’s test that.

You first. I'm not touching those

A few of them are quite large.

I am 100% relying on others first.

originally posted by: lightedhype

originally posted by: carewemust
Checkpoint #2 just released.

twitter.com...

What does that mean?

It means that those whom have downloaded the files now have an additional decryption key and need to start researching and relaying that information.

No, they released this separately from the key encrypted set, at least, where I got it from.

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: greyhat

Thank-you for the link, GreyHat.

Its so long ago, but if i remember it correctly someone posted a link to a google drive there.

You may also follow @_cryptome_

a reply to: gallop

Gotcha. You are correct. These 'previews' are separate.

Might I ask one of you lovely folks to spin up VMware to check these attachments out on? Hell even better do it on an AWS vm.

I am mobile atm, but it sounds like the data has been secured. Good on you people!

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: lightedhype

originally posted by: carewemust
Checkpoint #2 just released.

twitter.com...

What does that mean?

It means that those whom have downloaded the files now have an additional decryption key and need to start researching and relaying that information.

so each "checkpoint" delivers a key to a different "room" where files are stored?

The initial 9.8GB file set had 5 files (and the teaser container), each a container to an encrypted drive, each of different 'value'. They provided the key for teaser layer, but this new release was separate, the one I got was a plain zip file, no key or password required, and unarchives.

Unless it was layer 2, and I just found someone reuploading it..

a reply to: bknapple32

Concur. Just too much data for me to consume. I wonder if anyone from those 911 investigation groups have started analyzing any of this data dump? You know those folks who've made 911 investigation their career. I would think some of them would know right off the bat if any docs so far are bombshells or nothing to see here move along?

a reply to: greyhat

From the posts at #TheDarkOverlord on Twitter, it looks like there's a lot of pressure on social media sites to ban his communications.

twitter.com...

They wouldn't ban those communications if the documents were fake, or non-important.

a reply to: gallop

Right. And Kaspersky for Linux found nothing to complain.

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: greyhat

From the posts at #TheDarkOverlord on Twitter, it looks like there's a lot of pressure on social media sites to ban his communications.

They get kicked faster than infowarz !

originally posted by: lightedhype
a reply to: gallop

Gotcha. You are correct. These 'previews' are separate.

Might I ask one of you lovely folks to spin up VMware to check these attachments out on? Hell even better do it on an AWS vm.

They're innocuous enough, a collection of MSG, PDF, PPT, DOC and TIF files, so far anyway, in both the preview set and the checkpoint file, totalling about 80mb for these two teasers.

None of the filenames stand out, at least to me..

a reply to: carewemust

They are banning fake news dear. Thats why the guy is being corralled.

www.theguardian.com...

I know I know you dont read.... So you've boasted. But theres some useful information there. Its not twitter but...

Here's checkpoint 2. Some interesting finds in here so far.


anonfiles.com/p1G439p3b4/Checkpoint_02_zip


LINK: anonfiles.com...
SHA-1 HASH: 8B679F6C2A8962DBEEF8B6537CE938F646865793

I'm dumb.

originally posted by: greyhat

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: greyhat

From the posts at #TheDarkOverlord on Twitter, it looks like there's a lot of pressure on social media sites to ban his communications.

They get kicked faster than infowarz !

I hope the DarkOverlord group can get ALL documents, particularly the UFO files, into the public domain before these law enforcement agencies catch up with them. Apparently, the agencies trying really hard, according to:

www.zerohedge.com...

DarkOverlord said the UFO files are a "10" on a scale of 1 to 10. The 9-11 files are a 7.5.

originally posted by: Iconic
a reply to: Iconic

One of the companies under the parent Lloyd's firm who's in charge of a big portion of the litigation is a company called Hiscox Syndicates Ltd.

The paralegals from Warden Grier PC were talking in an email (which I got through the archives..) were talking about how to sign the confidentiality agreement with the complaints to not "raise red flags" and one of them asked about if the Hiscox company owned "Syndicate 33".

Looking up syndicate 33, I found a page with their logo. The A is replaced with a semi-inscribed triangle, with 33 in it.


Very strange coincidence there... Will keep digging though.

FWIW that logo you found linked to another website for a completely unrelated company called syndicate 33.

a reply to: bknapple32

Woops, that is totally right. Disregard. I'm flying through this stuff so fast, I didn't even bother to really dig into that site.



/embarassed


ETA: Other post edited

originally posted by: Iconic
a reply to: bknapple32

Woops, that is totally right. Disregard. I'm flying through this stuff so fast, I didn't even bother to really dig into that site.



/embarassed

What’s oddly funny is that there’s a ton of assasins creed references to syndicate 33.

originally posted by: bknapple32

originally posted by: Iconic
a reply to: Iconic

One of the companies under the parent Lloyd's firm who's in charge of a big portion of the litigation is a company called Hiscox Syndicates Ltd.

The paralegals from Warden Grier PC were talking in an email (which I got through the archives..) were talking about how to sign the confidentiality agreement with the complaints to not "raise red flags" and one of them asked about if the Hiscox company owned "Syndicate 33".

Looking up syndicate 33, I found a page with their logo. The A is replaced with a semi-inscribed triangle, with 33 in it.


Very strange coincidence there... Will keep digging though.

FWIW that logo you found linked to another website for a completely unrelated company called syndicate 33.

It looks like Syndicate 33 is a Lloyds of London subsidiary.
www.businesswire.com...’s-Syndicate-33

2 hours or so since last upload. its 2am for me, so I'm off for the night. Hope to wake up to more goodies. But we'll see. Night all.