It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Ridpath's theory does indeed INFURIATE the personnel involved in the RFI
Gizza clue, Baa. Goooo onnnn, you know you want to...
originally posted by: mirageman
While I was still mirageboy the US and Allied MIC was always hyper inflating the military and technological threat from the Soviet Bloc. I didn't know that at the time of course. But it was all part of a much larger game being played out on a global scale to ensure our taxes paid for a lot more 'security' than we ever really needed.
Quantum coherence in microtubules: a neural basis for emergent consciousness?
Stuart R. Hameroff
Advanced Biotechnology Laboratory, Department of Anesthesiology, University of Arizona Health Sciences Center, Tucson, AZ 85724, USA Journal of Consciousness Studies, 1, No.1, Summer 1994
Abstract: The paper begins with a general introduction to the nature of human consciousness and outlines several different philosophical approaches. A critique of traditional reductionist and dualist positions is offered and it is suggested that consciousness should be viewed as an emergent property of physical systems. However, although consciousness has its origin in distributed brain processes it has macroscopic properties most notably the "unitary sense of self", non-deterministic free will, and non-algorithmic intuitive processing which can best be described by quantum-mechanical principles. There have been many attempts by physicists and philosophers to apply quantum mechanical principles to the realm of consciousness, but they have been primarily speculative and analogical as there has been little supportive evidence from the neurosciences. This paper postulates that cytoskeletal microtubules within neurons could be a possible site for quantum effects. Although the supportive evidence for such a thesis is, of necessity, highly technical, the article has been structured in such a way that the general arguments are accessible to the general reader. For those more technically minded, full supportive evidence is available in footnotes and appendices
I don't however think this connects to the RFI at all. I've done the work, found the matches. It can explain a lot but not the RFI.
originally posted by: ctj83
a reply to: AdamE
What if what TTSA say is a complete 180 from what we or John believes?
That belief will be buried under an avalanche of TTSa.
originally posted by: KellyPrettyBear
a reply to: AdamE
I won't be holding my breath, for reputed Russian defectors
holding ultra-sensitive intelligence information to have
their military grade, MKultra type intel to be released to
the general public.
But on a positive note, we now have it confirmed who is
feeding the misinformation to John.