Reports that Rod Rosenstein Has Verbally Resigned To John Kelly

originally posted by: Gryphon66
By virtually any reasonable or rational measure, Trump is obviously unfit for the Presidency ... his willful ignorance, his ridiculous foreign and economic policies, his demeanor, comportment, and generally incohent behavior which has been both witnessed by the public and documented by White House staffers.

If Rosenstein did suggest the 25th Amendment, he's a patriot, and history will attest that.

While I think he is a major jackass he's still the President and his policies are his to implement within the constructs of the law. If people don't like him they can vote him out in 2020 as Hot Rod's 25th play wouldn't have worked.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: BlueAjah

The documents don't support trumps claims, therefore they will never be declassified.

Actually the already released documents support all trumps claims.


"oh curses already just curses"

originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

By virtually any reasonable or rational measure, Trump is obviously unfit for the Presidency ... his willful ignorance, his ridiculous foreign and economic policies, his demeanor, comportment, and generally incohent behavior which has been both witnessed by the public and documented by White House staffers.

If Rosenstein did suggest the 25th Amendment, he's a patriot, and history will attest that.

too bad for ya that the standard is "unable" and not your opined unfit

originally posted by: CriticalStinker

originally posted by: shooterbrody
www.axios.com...

Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein has verbally resigned to Chief of Staff John Kelly in anticipation of being fired by President Trump, according to a source with direct knowledge. Per a second source with direct knowledge: “He’s expecting to be fired,” so he plans to step down.

two sources with axios...

I can see either side on the validity of the claim. We've seen tons of news stories claiming someone is days away form stepping down.... The results have been mixed bags, best taken with a block of salt.

If there is one thing we should have learned it is that until something is final, dont take it for granted.

No many how many sources report what, we will all have to wait to see what is officially announced.

a reply to: vinifalou

But the president has back peddled on that proclamation. I guess the warrants don't support what hes claiming. Rut Roh.
So if they are not declassified and the president does not fire Rosenstein which he wont if he knows whats good for him then that whole thing is just a larp which thinking people know it to be.

a reply to: theantediluvian

I agree with you that what rosenstein did was within his rights regarding the 25th amendment.

Wouldnt it also apply that trump firing comey or rosenstein is also within his rights, and not a crime such as obstruction?

originally posted by: Grambler
Wouldnt it also apply that trump firing comey or rosenstein is also within his rights, and not a crime such as obstruction?

According to Alan Dershowitz it wouldn't be a crime and is within his powers as President.

originally posted by: bigfatfurrytexan
a reply to: underwerks

Can you cite where Mueller has stated that Trump is being investigated for anything, let alone "obstruction"?

Im happy to wait.

Mr. Mueller wants to question the president about the tweets. His interest in them is the latest addition to a range of presidential actions he is investigating as a possible obstruction case: private interactions with Mr. Comey, Mr. Sessions and other senior administration officials about the Russia inquiry; misleading White House statements; public attacks; and possible pardon offers to potential witnesses.

Mueller examining Trumps tweets in Wide Ranging Obstruction Probe

Hope you didn’t have to wait too long.

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus

originally posted by: Fallingdown
I always believe talking heads and lawyers over the constitution too.

Good, you should believe people like Alan Dershowitz who teaches this subject after practicing it himself for decades because he's correct.

The issue is not the 25th Amendment - it is the means in which it is invoked. If you think the idea was that people could spy on the President to try and create some evidence via a recording and then lobby the cabinet based on that recording, then you are sorely mistaken.

a reply to: UKTruth

In which case his answer would have to be fire me. He knows what effect that will have. He sure wont make it easy for trump.

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus

originally posted by: Grambler
Wouldnt it also apply that trump firing comey or rosenstein is also within his rights, and not a crime such as obstruction?

According to Alan Dershowitz it wouldn't be a crime and is within his powers as President.

Exactly.

And yet the dems constantly call for investigations into obstruction.

And not just ATS dems, but congress members with actual power.

Further proving that they feel that they will just make up anything to try and remove him from office.

LOL Trump is in New York today.

😎💯

CNN wants to report Kav touched RR in the face with his wiener and got envy then quit.

As always S&S for Grambler !

a reply to: Grambler

Not Confirmed . Thursday , Sept. 27th , Rosenstein will meet with the President . The Meeting's Purpose is Unknown .

originally posted by: underwerks

originally posted by: bigfatfurrytexan
a reply to: underwerks

Can you cite where Mueller has stated that Trump is being investigated for anything, let alone "obstruction"?

Im happy to wait.

Mr. Mueller wants to question the president about the tweets. His interest in them is the latest addition to a range of presidential actions he is investigating as a possible obstruction case: private interactions with Mr. Comey, Mr. Sessions and other senior administration officials about the Russia inquiry; misleading White House statements; public attacks; and possible pardon offers to potential witnesses.

Mueller examining Trumps tweets in Wide Ranging Obstruction Probe

Hope you didn’t have to wait too long.

LOL

from zi NYTimez .....

according to three people briefed on the matter.

💥🤪💥

a reply to: BlueAjah

The ones that trump decided NOT to declassify? Those documents? LOL

a reply to: UKTruth

If you think the idea was that people could spy on the President to try and create some evidence via a recording and then lobby the cabinet based on that recording, then you are sorely mistaken.

I love when pundits omit alleged when it suits them, by anonymous sources especially.

It's kind of like when people say that book about Trump that came out recently is a hack job, but then quote it for "treason" charges.

a reply to: xuenchen

meeting at the un?

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: xuenchen

meeting at the un?

Wanna take bets on if it has anything to do with Syria, Iran, Russia, Israel?

Bolton has been going around talking an awful lot on how we won't leave till Iran does. Anytime Bolton starts getting busy, I start getting worried.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: UKTruth

In which case his answer would have to be fire me. He knows what effect that will have. He sure wont make it easy for trump.

[RR]'s a real trooper ain't 'e

real braveheart

in reality he is a classic choke-artist (lump-in-throat syndrome)

💮💯💮