TH3WH17ERABB17 -Q- Questions. White House Insider's postings -PART -9 -

a reply to: ModusPonus

Is this your way of conceding the point?

a reply to: BringMeThanos

Ah, thread 8. That helps a lot. Kind regards and no hatred from me toward you or anyone. I like a good debate. I might get involved in it myself if I acquire enough knowledge of the subject.

originally posted by: AndyFromMichigan
#1711 has been posed:

Q !CbboFOtcZs ID: d74be4 No.2296993 📁
Jul 26 2018 11:44:26 (EST)
1zwchz1jbsr61f1c4mgf0abl-wpengine.netdna-ssl.com...📁
What was the point of filing impeachment art if Ryan was going to reject?
Known beforehand?
Optics.
Think logically.
Could Sessions publicly challenge [RR] w/o creating a dilemma?
What events would immediately transpire if Sessions challenged [RR]?
Would it immediately demonstrate that Sessions must be aware of key Mueller facts?
Facts (or failure of duty) that he cannot possibly ‘know’ if recused?
Facts (a case) he is suppose to be recused from?
Think logically.
One challenge to [RR] would immediately trigger attacks to remove Sessions given his clear involvement in receiving information re: a case he is fully recused from.
Who does Huber [directly] report to?
Is it normal [RR] is side-stepped re: Huber CoC?
Why is this important?
Why did Sessions recuse?
Is the LEFT attacking Sessions?
What advantage(s) exist based on this setup?
POTUS publicly expresses his anger re: his recusal?
Do you believe POTUS would allow a complete takeover of his DOJ if nothing was being done behind the scenes to hold people accountable?
When POTUS states “the swamp is being drained” do you believe it?
When POTUS states “it’s happening” do you believe it?
Do you believe POTUS would allow Sessions & [RR] to run HIS DOJ if something wasn’t being done to his liking?
LOGICAL THINKING.
Clickbait derails logical thought.
Think for yourself.
Trust yourself.
Mueller investigating POTUS’ Tweets for obstruction?
You have a front row seat.
Enjoy the show.
Q

Q seems to be saying that this show about impeaching RR is just a distraction.
Is Huber reporting directly to Sessions? Q is indicating that RR is out of the loop on the IG's investigations.

Have you read the recent Stealth Jeff thread?
twitter.com...

Jul 26 2018 12:44:26
Q
!CbboFOtcZs
2296993
1zwchz1jbsr61f1c4mgf0abl-wpengine.netdna-ssl.com...
What was the point of filing impeachment art if Ryan was going to reject?
Known beforehand?
Optics.
Think logically.
Could Sessions publicly challenge [RR] w/o creating a dilemma?
What events would immediately transpire if Sessions challenged [RR]?
Would it immediately demonstrate that Sessions must be aware of key Mueller facts?
Facts (or failure of duty) that he cannot possibly ‘know’ if recused?
Facts (a case) he is suppose to be recused from?
Think logically.
One challenge to [RR] would immediately trigger attacks to remove Sessions given his clear involvement in receiving information re: a case he is fully recused from.
Who does Huber [directly] report to?
Is it normal [RR] is side-stepped re: Huber CoC?
Why is this important?
Why did Sessions recuse?
Is the LEFT attacking Sessions?
What advantage(s) exist based on this setup?
POTUS publicly expresses his anger re: his recusal?
Do you believe POTUS would allow a complete takeover of his DOJ if nothing was being done behind the scenes to hold people accountable?
When POTUS states “the swamp is being drained” do you believe it?
When POTUS states “it’s happening” do you believe it?
Do you believe POTUS would allow Sessions & [RR] to run HIS DOJ if something wasn’t being done to his liking?
LOGICAL THINKING.
Clickbait derails logical thought.
Think for yourself.
Trust yourself.
Mueller investigating POTUS’ Tweets for obstruction?
You have a front row seat.
Enjoy the show.
Q

Link

Hmm, attached Gohmert to that link.
He did go after PS like a pitbull.

originally posted by: PokeyJoe

originally posted by: BringMeThanos
a reply to: ModusPonus

Because if it turns out Q has been lying to you all the time then he has molded your opinion on what is fact and what isn't.

Something already evident in your list of things you wouldn't of believed.

Trump would have NK shipping hero remains home and tearing down nuclear bomb building sites, I would have said nah....but we know what happened. I also would not have believed the changes at the house of Saud, massive employment growth, new trade deals that actually are fair, lower taxes

Considering Obama achieved many of these already during his term and the rest are unproven what makes these so unbelievable or true?

Oh wait... its because Q told you it was important and "BOOMs" right...

See that is the big disconnect here. Q is not telling any of us how to think. We know how to think. We are forming our own conclusions based on what is there. Q is no one's savior or prophet.

No you are not. And when you don't come to the conclusion that Q wants he's quick to correct your thinking.

Q 's greatest achievement is making you all think that you are thinking for yourself and coming to the same conclusion. Giving you little puzzles to solve, how many of his crumbs have led to dead-ends? How quickly do you forget these and are distracted by the next shiny thing he waves in front of you.

Look back through his "unsolved' posts... surely something he posted in December should of had some meaning by now?

Or does Q just like playing the riddler... slightly strange for person your pinning all your hopes and dreams on to be a troll?

a reply to: 0311Warrior

Re Q Post #1706 on qntmpkts.keybase.pub...:


This pic looks relevant from the same speech (judging by podium logo)!


Note the text re NoName undermining "citizens" and "rights".

Note that viewing image details on the Q Post shows that the background flag has been blacked out. Q's saying "You didn't say that stuff in the name of America!!!

ETA - may not be same event... ties are different. NOTE Noname wearing YELLOW tie in Q pic.

What is the podium logo from? NATO or Arizona?

ETA2 looking into NoNames NATO speeches

originally posted by: BringMeThanos
a reply to: CanadianMason

Its hard to find one post that sums it up.

This is a good point in the last thread

www.abovetopsecret.com...

Normally people call out for threads to be put in Hoax bin when they are revealed to be hoaxes

Mods- can you please look at these stock images Q posted and if you feel they are fakes put this thread where it belongs

originally posted by: BringMeThanos
a reply to: CoramDeo

Thanks for drawing on your own personal experiences but the answer was a posting ban.

A 20 day Posting Ban?
Long one.

What was it for?

originally posted by: Whereismypassword

originally posted by: BringMeThanos
a reply to: CanadianMason

Its hard to find one post that sums it up.

This is a good point in the last thread

www.abovetopsecret.com...

Normally people call out for threads to be put in Hoax bin when they are revealed to be hoaxes

Mods- can you please look at these stock images Q posted and if you feel they are fakes put this thread where it belongs

Are these pictures all you guys really have to hold on to?

a reply to: PokeyJoe

See that is the big disconnect here. Q is not telling any of us how to think. We know how to think. We are forming our own conclusions based on what is there. Q is no one's savior or prophet.

In Q's last post:

Think for yourself.
Trust yourself.

a reply to: BringMeThanos

Your debunking of the photos is misleading at best. The only Clarity you have brought is that the president posted +++ before Q which I appreciate.
But he never claims he posted first in the first place so that doesn't disprove Q in any way either.
But the sheer silliness to think that by debunking a photo that was never explained by the poster one way or another will debunk the other thousand and a half posts seems ludicrous

a reply to: BringMeThanos

nope just not engaging trolls anymore....buhbye
Than Q

originally posted by: PokeyJoe

originally posted by: Whereismypassword

originally posted by: BringMeThanos
a reply to: CanadianMason

Its hard to find one post that sums it up.

This is a good point in the last thread

www.abovetopsecret.com...

Normally people call out for threads to be put in Hoax bin when they are revealed to be hoaxes

Mods- can you please look at these stock images Q posted and if you feel they are fakes put this thread where it belongs

Are these pictures all you guys really have to hold on to?

As I said, it's like CNN and Stormy Daniels. Yes, it's all they have.

originally posted by: PokeyJoe

originally posted by: Whereismypassword

originally posted by: BringMeThanos
a reply to: CanadianMason

Its hard to find one post that sums it up.

This is a good point in the last thread

www.abovetopsecret.com...

Normally people call out for threads to be put in Hoax bin when they are revealed to be hoaxes

Mods- can you please look at these stock images Q posted and if you feel they are fakes put this thread where it belongs

Are these pictures all you guys really have to hold on to?

Do you actualy read these threads?

JA was said to be free, left the embassy ages ago
HRC had a video so shocking NYPD were in tears but the cult here were licking their lips in relish about watching it online. There sick!

Russia Today the voice of the Kremlin airing this on TV late last year, this doesn’t deserve any air time

a reply to: Whereismypassword

This is an amazing thing to watch.

Dashen and other contributors have worked hard, posted an immense amount of interconnected factual dots, research, and logical-thinking discussion.

Q posts a couple of odd pictures, followed by some critical evaluations, and YOU come to this important thread and demand it be put in the Hoax bin????? You must think the mods are stupid.

a reply to: IAMTAT

Probably justified, it was for constant engagement in off-topic posts in a non T&C complaint manner over a short period.

Normally replying to others but I'm on my best behaviour now. Hoping to add to this fascinating Q discussion.


Hey guys, what are your thoughts on R?

a reply to: RelSciHistItSufi

It's the symbol for Polaris (pole star).

originally posted by: queenofswords
a reply to: Whereismypassword

This is an amazing thing to watch.

Dashen and other contributors have worked hard, posted an immense amount of interconnected factual dots, research, and logical-thinking discussion.

Q posts a couple of odd pictures, followed by some critical evaluations, and YOU come to this important thread and demand it be put in the Hoax bin????? You must think the mods are stupid.

Excuse me, plenty of hoaxed material has been put in the hoax box on ATS

Why should this thread be different?

Been a memeber since 2005 and lurked before, I have seen plenty of threads end up in the hoax bin

originally posted by: Whereismypassword

originally posted by: PokeyJoe

originally posted by: Whereismypassword

originally posted by: BringMeThanos
a reply to: CanadianMason

Its hard to find one post that sums it up.

This is a good point in the last thread

www.abovetopsecret.com...

Normally people call out for threads to be put in Hoax bin when they are revealed to be hoaxes

Mods- can you please look at these stock images Q posted and if you feel they are fakes put this thread where it belongs

Are these pictures all you guys really have to hold on to?

Do you actualy read these threads?

JA was said to be free, left the embassy ages ago
HRC had a video so shocking NYPD were in tears but the cult here were licking their lips in relish about watching it online. There sick!

Russia Today the voice of the Kremlin airing this on TV late last year, this doesn’t deserve any air time

Don't forget Obama's ak47

a reply to: PokeyJoe

Q is not telling any of us how to think. We know how to think. We are forming our own conclusions based on what is there. Q is no one's savior or prophet.

In fact, I tend toward the belief that the style in which Q posts actually compels people to think - not how to think or what to think but just to think for themselves. He sometimes offers a 'course correction' if things get a little too wild, right? but Q's usage of the Socratic Method is, IMHO, masterful.