It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: samkent
a reply to: Jesushere
But the physical proof shows foreign nationals flew planes into the buildings.
You have to go with the proof. Not supposition.
Now if you can show the US paid them under the table to do the deed, then you have something.
The 9/11 commission says that information was not shared as the CIA and FBI did not get along and were rivals in 2001. While it can be true? Can there be another reason the CIA did not want the FBI arresting the Pentagon hijackers before 9/11?
originally posted by: Saiker
Lots of rabbit holes with 911. One clear thing that is evident is that more resources, man-hours, and media coverage has been invested in investigating the trump-Russia collusion claims than any investigation of official capacity been invested into figuring out what happened that day. When the 911 threads pop up it seems there are a few that get offended as if any evidence of official capacity has been presented by the government to shut down the vast conspiracy theories floating about.
The evidence of removal of pertinent information is evident when it comes to the twin towers and the Pentagon. This fact and the history between the mastermind and Bush should have inspired years of bush-terrorist collusion investigations by our government. Even if the conspiracy theories are nuts each one deserves more scrutiny than the whole investigation that has been put forward.
6. If anyone would have had the necessary connections to have actually have been involved in 9/11, it would have been someone like Trump