Hillary Clinton and 9/11

IMPORTANT: Using Content From Other Websites on ATS
MOD NOTE: Posting work written by others

Q Drop #977

HRC and 9/11

files.abovetopsecret.com...

a reply to: FlyingFox

What does any of your rants have to do with the physical evidence?
The only thing you have is innuendo.

Again, if the US government was responsible for the actions that brought down the WTC, why would they need foreign ties for an “inside job”?

How did the Clintons profit from 9/11? You know? The title and topic of your thread “Hillary Clinton and 9/11”? Not dozens of random questions with no context.

Why have conspiracists abundance references to the actual physical evidence?

Murder investigations start with how the victims died, how they ended up where the remains were found, and what was the motivation to commit the crime. How did the Clintons profit from the murders at the WTC for example?

I hate corruption. But your arguments are liken to Walmart selling alcohol makes Walmart responsible for all drunk driving deaths.

Do I think middle eastern interests played politicians and the immigration system to get murderous terrorists into the USA, yes.

Do I think a majority of the used politicians knew they were getting murderous terrorists into the USA for a specific middle eastern plot, no.

Do I think politicians plotted to cover their own bottoms after 9/11. Yes.

We know the Vietnam war started because the White House back then faked an event that never happened essentially that war started over a false flag, it's a verifiable historical fact. Iraq WMD was another false flag fake evidence was masqueraded as the truth. We know the joint chiefs of staff during Kennedy presidency tried to get the president sign off on doing terrorist attacks inside the United States and blame it on the Cubans. They were not against killing Americans to start a war.

Operation Northwoods does not look all that different to 9/11. It involved hijacking planes and using them as drones. If they had drone type technology in the 60's they had in 2001.

Tip of the iceberg!

Love this. Thanks for the post.

a reply to: Jesushere

But the physical proof shows foreign nationals flew planes into the buildings.
You have to go with the proof. Not supposition.

Now if you can show the US paid them under the table to do the deed, then you have something.

originally posted by: samkent
a reply to: Jesushere

But the physical proof shows foreign nationals flew planes into the buildings.
You have to go with the proof. Not supposition.

Now if you can show the US paid them under the table to do the deed, then you have something.

I not sure what happened exactly in the shadows on 9/11, but we know for a fact the CIA kept information from the FBI about the 9/11 Hijackers arrival to the United States. We can verify that now today. The 9/11 commission says that information was not shared as the CIA and FBI did not get along and were rivals in 2001. While it can be true? Can there be another reason the CIA did not want the FBI arresting the Pentagon hijackers before 9/11? Was there a conspiracy involving the CIA at the highest levels and had to be kept a secret? We know the CIA had regular contacts with Saudis government officials on a regular basis they were allies and not buying for one minute Saudi Intelligence did not know what has been discussed in Bin Laden camps in Afganistan and Pakistan prior to 9/11.

Proof? That the planes were NOT on autopilot? lol, "proof". Do you mean "evidence"? Guess what, circumstantial evidence is a type of evidence.

Also:



If someone wants to reply to those selected Q posts, that would be tip-top.

Sorry I couldn't make everything crystal-clear and perfectly referenced in my opening post. It's not a theatre or a TV show, nobody here paid for admission, so maybe lower your expectations a hair.

I'm not here to go toe-to-toe with every member and cross every sword. I'm making a collection of issues and events that are relevant to my pet subject.

When someone answer those Q posts, we'll be moving forward TO GET HER.

a reply to: FlyingFox

Please define “Proof? That the planes were NOT on autopilot? ” What do mean by autopilot. The terrorists trained on any simulator they could get ahold of. And used automated trim controls and the flight computers like everyday pilots?

And how did the Clintons benefit from the destruction of the WTC or the Pentagon?

And if it was an “in side job”, why would you need foreign ties and/or foreign terrorists?

Why would anyone have to pay terrorists to do anything when Middle Eastern governments already flip the bill for training and funding?

a reply to: Jesushere

So what event was that ??

The Gulf of Tonkin incident of August 1964 ??

en.wikipedia.org...

There were 2 incidents in the Gulf of Tonkin

First one night of August when destroyer USS MADDOX was attacked by 3 North Vietnam P4 torpedo boats

Maddox opened fire and called for help from USS TICONDEOGA

TICONDEOGA launched 2 F 8 "Crusaders" which strafed and rocketed the torpedo boats damaging them severely ,killing
4 crew members and wounding 6 more

One of the fighters was damaged by return fire

So we have a real sea battle going on with real casualties

MADDOX in turn was joined by second destroyer USS TURBER JOY

Second incident 2 nights was caused by jittery crew and radar ghosts, also known as anomalous propagation

The North Vietnamese were actually out that night attempting to salvage the damaged craft - so what crew thought
they saw and heard on radar/sonar may have been real ........

But keep on believing in your conspiracy fantasy if it makes you happy......

a reply to: Jesushere

The 9/11 commission says that information was not shared as the CIA and FBI did not get along and were rivals in 2001. While it can be true? Can there be another reason the CIA did not want the FBI arresting the Pentagon hijackers before 9/11?

That's no surprise to anyone.
Local police have a problem when state police get involved.
Local fire investigators have a problem when state investigators get involved.
Air force vs Navy
The typical rivalry manifests itself by holding your cards close to your vest.

The CIA is charged with people and events 'outside' the US.
The FBI is charged with people and events 'inside' the US.

If you are the CIA and the people enter the states you are likely to say,
it's the FBI's problem now. Lets them figure it out. Let them look bad.

Lots of rabbit holes with 911. One clear thing that is evident is that more resources, man-hours, and media coverage has been invested in investigating the trump-Russia collusion claims than any investigation of official capacity been invested into figuring out what happened that day. When the 911 threads pop up it seems there are a few that get offended as if any evidence of official capacity has been presented by the government to shut down the vast conspiracy theories floating about.

The evidence of removal of pertinent information is evident when it comes to the twin towers and the Pentagon. This fact and the history between the mastermind and Bush should have inspired years of bush-terrorist collusion investigations by our government. Even if the conspiracy theories are nuts each one deserves more scrutiny than the whole investigation that has been put forward.

originally posted by: Saiker
Lots of rabbit holes with 911. One clear thing that is evident is that more resources, man-hours, and media coverage has been invested in investigating the trump-Russia collusion claims than any investigation of official capacity been invested into figuring out what happened that day. When the 911 threads pop up it seems there are a few that get offended as if any evidence of official capacity has been presented by the government to shut down the vast conspiracy theories floating about.

The evidence of removal of pertinent information is evident when it comes to the twin towers and the Pentagon. This fact and the history between the mastermind and Bush should have inspired years of bush-terrorist collusion investigations by our government. Even if the conspiracy theories are nuts each one deserves more scrutiny than the whole investigation that has been put forward.

False argument by you. Many of the debunkers at ATS have weighed the evidence of the actual events vs. the cherry picked tid bits the truth movement obsesses over.

Many of the debunkers have the attitude of trust no one, verify, and act as a filter to misinform. While many conspiracists act as an open pipe to freely distribute the old and tired arguments of the truth movement that hides context, hides actual facts, or pushes fraudulent claims.

Many cases, debunkers don’t even bother with the government’s facts. WTC 7 for example, there are other studies that show WTC 7 was brought down by fire damaged and thermal stress. What happen to the WTC 7 Evaluation Project? The study that was going to prove fire related collapse at WTC 7 was impossible? AE 9/11 Truth put something like 300,000 dollars into the study. The release of the study has already been delayed 6 months. It was just released the study will be delayed at least another year? And AE didn’t complain one bit? Probably because they found fire collapse was very possible, and more likely than a silent CD with no shrapnel.


Would you like to discuss DR. Wood’s dustification of the WTC?

Steven Jones fraudulent thermite paper?

The results of Jones testing WTC dust for thermite in an inert atmosphere have never been released.

The experiments of WTC dust by Jones to prove composition and energy content whose results cannot be replicated?

There is absolutely no evidence of detonations at the WTC capable of cutting structural steel.

The numerous eyewitnesses that attest to a large commercial jet hitting the pentagon.

Absolutely no evidence of a missile or bomb at the pentagon.

The DNA and human remains at the WTC, the Pentagon, and the Shanksville.

Would you like to discuss no jets, holograms, and lasers?

Buildings constructed to self destruct, or rebar covered in C-4?

The ignoring of all the contact damage at the pentagon. The items hit by flight 77? The antenna, the light poles, the trees, the equipment in the construction yard pushed towards the Pentagon, the concrete wall clipped by an engine?

Let me see if I can frame my thoughts on Trump and 9/11 in a way that's not too subtle.

1. Trump is/was a New Yorker on 9/11.

2. Trump knows a lot about real estate and construction and tall buildings.

3. Trump has/had plenty of connections all over the world (and in NYC) in the building and construction industry.

4. Trump's private plane is a modified Boeing passenger jet (as was his previous jet which he owned from 1997 on).

5. Trump spent his entire life heavily involved in the real estate industry in and around NYC

6. If anyone would have had the necessary connections to have actually have been involved in 9/11, it would have been someone like Trump

7. Trump's sudden decision to get into politics and be POTUS seems odd and out of place. He has a history of toying with the notion but he never seemed to be serious until now.


I realize this thread is about Hillary but it is important to note that Hillary was not elected. If there is a truth that the public doesn't know about 9/11, Donald Trump probably knows it. If it is/was conspiracy, why hasn't he spilled the beans?

a reply to: BrianFlanders

6. If anyone would have had the necessary connections to have actually have been involved in 9/11, it would have been someone like Trump

Can you be any more vague or speculative?

How did Trump benefit from 9/11?

Families who lost loved ones at the WTC were “involved” in 9/11? Please use something more specific than involved?

Trump keeps ties with terrorists that kill innocent people and destroy buildings? Mueller should be told?

If anyone would have had the necessary connections to have actually have been involved in 9/11, it would have been Middle Eastern terrorists........ Who were actually trained and funded for something like9/11?

There's a claim that there will be a 9/11 disclosure?

They cover up Kennedy for 60 years, but somehow are going to just show that 9/11 was an inside job?

What would "their" intent be for doing this? Does Q elaborate on this?

Controlled demolition of the government?

I've got a bridge for sale btw

a reply to: BrianFlanders

Look what Trump did for the Kennedy documents, he took the CIAs advice and released heavily redacted and partial documents.