It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

House Intelligence FISA memo released: What it says

page: 50
169
<< 47  48  49    51  52  53 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Feb, 3 2018 @ 12:09 AM
link   
a reply to: GeechQuestInfo

Patience. When the manure is this deep it takes a bit of digging to make sure that you've gotten to the bottom of it. Make no mistake, this is not a new thing within these agencies---it is a decades old problem.

Don't know if you're old enough to remember WaterGate but in case you're not---it took two years of investigations before anything real popped to the public. This is far more massive and serious than breaking into campaign headquarters so whoever is herding this flock of ducks into line has a lot of work to do.




posted on Feb, 3 2018 @ 12:43 AM
link   
Notice there were really no major leaks concerning this MEMO? Notice also, the Inspector General and his enormous team of 450 special agents and virtually no major Leaks concerning his investigation. Contrast that with Mueller's team and its leaking, Comey's FBI that leaked like a sieve and the list goes on with former Obama employees. The Media, never leaked that the President was NEVER UNDER INVESTIGATION. THE MEDIA never leaked how corrupted Steele was with his bias. The leaks were designed to take down the President, especially the leaks they got wrong. THE MEDIA leaked EVERYTHING ELSE THEY COULD.

How can anyone in their right mind, not see a wider collusion? This MEMO as produced, is in harmony with such behavior, and should tell anyone the Dem's are lying and they are lying with the Media. Who in the Media or among the Dems (Schiff) wanted the Info on GPS FUSION and its funding to be made public? Was that(funding of FUSION) EVER LEAKED and WIDELY reported before it was revealed?

Just going by the leaking, one can see a pattern. The leaking against Flynn, the FBI AGENT involved in Flynn's case, who hated Trump.

This is an absolute farce and this lie about the Russians is a scary lie that smacks of McCarthyism and racial bias against the Russians, considering Clappers own words “If you put that in context with everything else we knew the Russians were doing to interfere with the election,” he said. “And just the historical practices of the Russians, who typically, are almost genetically driven to co-opt, penetrate, gain favor, whatever, which is a typical Russian technique. So, we were concerned.”

Genetically driven? To guests on Tucker Carlson's show who are Dems and accusing him of "carrying water for Putin".

This is absolute insanity. Now, people are not allowed to question the FBI? Eventhough Martin Luther King was lied about by the FBI! J EDGAR HOOVER is a name that doesn't sit well with many, and Comey in my mind seemed like a man who walked in his counsel.

Given the past, and the current problem with the leaking inside the Government against an elected President, with intent to take the President down, there should be a FULL INVESTIGATION into the Intelligence services regarding all these matters and made PUBLIC.

These problems go FAR BEYOND DONALD TRUMP. He just got caught up in this. This goes way beyond him. Any person who might want to go against the Establishment like Ron or Rand Paul, can't do it, because the Establishment is designed to not want to give power away.

I don't see Donald Trump offering ideas on how to fix this. Sure, he is caught up in this, but there are no ideas. The Congress is divided, and sure somethings are highlighted, but where is the proposed FIX?
edit on 3-2-2018 by talisman because: (no reason given)

edit on 3-2-2018 by talisman because: added sentence

edit on 3-2-2018 by talisman because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 3 2018 @ 12:59 AM
link   
a reply to: burgerbuddy

Perjury, is intentionally lying under oath. One would have to prove and provide proof of said lie. So if Comey did commit perjury, then by all means provide the proof of such. If it is cause Trump said he did, well now we get into a bit of a problem as now it is a case of he said/he said, and that would also mean that Trump would have to appear under oath to give his side of events.



posted on Feb, 3 2018 @ 01:04 AM
link   
Just to add something off topic but will relate. Julian Assange tweeted this today
twitter.com...
"Big puzzle: why does #FBI claim its investigation is based #Papadopoulos hearing in April "Russians have thousands of Clinton emails". Simple cross-check shows #WikiLeaks' #DNCLeaks weren't obtained from DNC until 25 May and investigation started in July after WL has published."

Am I reading him correctly? THE DNC leaks came from the DNC? So, someone at the DNC leaked him the info?
edit on 3-2-2018 by talisman because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 3 2018 @ 01:09 AM
link   

originally posted by: talisman
Just to add something off topic but will relate. Julian Assange tweeted this today
twitter.com...
"Big puzzle: why does #FBI claim its investigation is based #Papadopoulos hearing in April "Russians have thousands of Clinton emails". Simple cross-check shows #WikiLeaks' #DNCLeaks weren't obtained from DNC until 25 May and investigation started in July after WL has published."

Am I reading him correctly? THE DNC leaks came from the DNC? So, someone at the DNC leaked him the info?


Its just standard wikileaks when it comes to the DNC hack. They have been saying on one hand "they never revel their sources" while the other is all "its a leak wink wink nudge nudge but here is no evidence just trust us".



posted on Feb, 3 2018 @ 01:24 AM
link   

originally posted by: Pyle

originally posted by: talisman
Just to add something off topic but will relate. Julian Assange tweeted this today
twitter.com...
"Big puzzle: why does #FBI claim its investigation is based #Papadopoulos hearing in April "Russians have thousands of Clinton emails". Simple cross-check shows #WikiLeaks' #DNCLeaks weren't obtained from DNC until 25 May and investigation started in July after WL has published."

Am I reading him correctly? THE DNC leaks came from the DNC? So, someone at the DNC leaked him the info?


Its just standard wikileaks when it comes to the DNC hack. They have been saying on one hand "they never revel their sources" while the other is all "its a leak wink wink nudge nudge but here is no evidence just trust us".


Unless they mean they never reveal a Living Source? I dunno, if Seth Rich was the source, but it sure seems like it is pointing in this direction. If he has evidence that the source was not the Russians, for him to reveal this, would have enormous ramifications.



posted on Feb, 3 2018 @ 01:37 AM
link   
a reply to: RadioRobert

There is one slight problem here: Adam Schiff can not issue a subpoena. He is the ranking member, but it would require the cooperation of the Republicans that sit on that committee as well, and if he does not have the votes, no subpoena. But Trey Gowdy is the head of the Oversight committee, and can issue subpoena's to his committee, and it does not require his committees majority vote for him to do such.

So here again the question is why are they not issuing subpoena's and getting people in to testify before congress on this?



posted on Feb, 3 2018 @ 01:42 AM
link   

originally posted by: sdcigarpig
a reply to: RadioRobert

There is one slight problem here: Adam Schiff can not issue a subpoena. He is the ranking member, but it would require the cooperation of the Republicans that sit on that committee as well, and if he does not have the votes, no subpoena. But Trey Gowdy is the head of the Oversight committee, and can issue subpoena's to his committee, and it does not require his committees majority vote for him to do such.

So here again the question is why are they not issuing subpoena's and getting people in to testify before congress on this?


They may very well, and could be waiting for the Inspector General's report. From what I have heard, this is only the beginning, and yet Gowdy won't be back.



posted on Feb, 3 2018 @ 01:42 AM
link   
Unconfirmed info -

FBI agents told McCabe they would testify in Flynn's defense stating they did not believe Flynn intended to mislead / lie. McCabe orders changes to the 302 document and then it was leaked to the media.



posted on Feb, 3 2018 @ 01:59 AM
link   

originally posted by: sdcigarpig
a reply to: RadioRobert

There is one slight problem here: Adam Schiff can not issue a subpoena. He is the ranking member, but it would require the cooperation of the Republicans that sit on that committee as well, and if he does not have the votes, no subpoena. But Trey Gowdy is the head of the Oversight committee, and can issue subpoena's to his committee, and it does not require his committees majority vote for him to do such.

So here again the question is why are they not issuing subpoena's and getting people in to testify before congress on this?


Try reading for comprehension and not argumentation this time:




A Schiff, and later the transcript of the vote, let slip that there is a congressional investigation of the DOJ/FBI active. Perhaps they are awaiting the return of the documents they requested in multiple letters this and last week so that they have relevant questions before subpoenaing executive branch heads to hearings (which they already hate having to do). 


Which is to say, they already subpoenaed records (texts, emails, etc) from several key players and will perhaps subpoena dept and bureau officials after those requests are complied with so they can ask pertinent questions rather than witch hunt.
edit on 3-2-2018 by RadioRobert because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 3 2018 @ 02:00 AM
link   

originally posted by: Xcathdra
Unconfirmed info -

FBI agents told McCabe they would testify in Flynn's defense stating they did not believe Flynn intended to mislead / lie. McCabe orders changes to the 302 document and then it was leaked to the media.


I have heard something along those lines. Is there any truth or verified source so far?



posted on Feb, 3 2018 @ 02:12 AM
link   

originally posted by: talisman

originally posted by: Xcathdra
Unconfirmed info -

FBI agents told McCabe they would testify in Flynn's defense stating they did not believe Flynn intended to mislead / lie. McCabe orders changes to the 302 document and then it was leaked to the media.


I have heard something along those lines. Is there any truth or verified source so far?


Not that I have been able to find (Jack Jack Posobiec tweeted it out).

Also -

Mike Cernovich
🇺🇸
‏Verified account @Cernovich
7h7 hours ago

Scoop - Flynn plea deal delayed as there's evidence FBI agents fabricated the 302s (notes summarizing witness interviews) in Flynn investigation. IG Report will reveal fabrication of other 302s, at the direction of Comey and others within DOJ.



edit on 3-2-2018 by Xcathdra because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 3 2018 @ 02:53 AM
link   
Apparently Democrats cant stop lying.

Rep. Zeldin NUKES CNN’s ‘Anonymous Sources’, McCabe’s Testimony That Dossier Was Used for FISA Warrants Was Recorded


Congressman Lee Zeldin (R-NY) took to Twitter following the release of the memo detailing FISA abuse and misconduct against the Trump campaign and asserted that former-FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe’s statements regarding the dossier were recorded during his sworn testimony.

His tweets nuked the claims of CNN’s “anonymous sources” that said McCabe never made the statements laid out in the memo.

As Democrats frantically attempted to discredit the memo, Zeldin wrote that McCabe testified under oath that there would not have been a warrant without the dubious Christopher Steele dossier which was commissioned by Fusion GPS and paid for by the Democratic National Committee and the Clinton campaign.

“McCabe did in fact testify under oath that there would not have been a FISA warrant if not for the dossier. It was recorded,” Rep. Zeldin tweeted.


click link for article.
edit on 3-2-2018 by Xcathdra because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 3 2018 @ 03:01 AM
link   
I'm wondering how the Left and Naysayers, are going Too try to Spin their Way out of this ( When The Inspector General's Report Hit's )? Plus the other Investigations and Special Counsel's that are bound to HAPPEN!?!?!

It may BE six months a year before every thing comes out? When it finally See's The Sun Shine as so many likes to say, there's going to be an awful lot of Government Officials, News Organizations, and People That Like To Eat CROW Because THAT'S ALL That's Going To Be On The MENU ! ! !






posted on Feb, 3 2018 @ 03:13 AM
link   

originally posted by: Xcathdra
Apparently Democrats cant stop lying.

Rep. Zeldin NUKES CNN’s ‘Anonymous Sources’, McCabe’s Testimony That Dossier Was Used for FISA Warrants Was Recorded


Congressman Lee Zeldin (R-NY) took to Twitter following the release of the memo detailing FISA abuse and misconduct against the Trump campaign and asserted that former-FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe’s statements regarding the dossier were recorded during his sworn testimony.

His tweets nuked the claims of CNN’s “anonymous sources” that said McCabe never made the statements laid out in the memo.

As Democrats frantically attempted to discredit the memo, Zeldin wrote that McCabe testified under oath that there would not have been a warrant without the dubious Christopher Steele dossier which was commissioned by Fusion GPS and paid for by the Democratic National Committee and the Clinton campaign.

“McCabe did in fact testify under oath that there would not have been a FISA warrant if not for the dossier. It was recorded,” Rep. Zeldin tweeted.


click link for article.


If McCabe did say that then the SC should be stopped... it's the one thing in the memo that if true completely undermines the Mueller investigation.

One thing that needs to be followed up - how did the FBI get their hands on transcripts of General Flynn's call to then use to trap him on a perjury charge? If they were surveilling Kislyak then Flynn's information should not have been unmasked and it should not have made it's way to the FBI. This is where Obama himself is on the hook because it was he who wrote the EO that allowed unparalleled sharing of intelligence between agencies, and it was his team that requested all the unmasking.

edit on 3/2/2018 by UKTruth because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 3 2018 @ 04:57 AM
link   
a reply to: UKTruth

It gets better... Apparently Rosenstein threatened Nunes.

BREAKING=> FOX Analyst: Rod Rosenstein Threatened Chairman Nunes and House Intel Members in a Meeting 3 Weeks Ago (Video)

FOX News legal analyst Gregg Jarrett went on with Sean Hannity on Friday night after the release of the House Intelligence FISA memo. Jarrett said his sources told him Rod Rosenstein threatened the House Intelligence Committee members three weeks ago.

The House Intelligence Committee released their classified FISA memo on Friday morning.

The House voted on Monday along party lines to share the explosive memo with the American public.

This comes after the approval of President Donald Trump.

** Read the entire un-redacted document here.

Gregg Jarrett: I can tell you a congressional source tells me that Rod Rosenstein in a meeting three weeks ago threatened Chairman Nunes and members of Congress he was going to subpoena their texts and messages because he was tired of dealing with the intel committee. That’s threats and intimidation.


video in link.



posted on Feb, 3 2018 @ 05:31 AM
link   

originally posted by: GeechQuestInfo
I haven’t decided what’s more annoying in the past couple years (maybe longer because time truly does fly).

-Benghazi
-Jade Helm
-Pizzagate
-Seth Rich
-The memo

They’re all overblown conspiracy theories that get extrapolated to the max, yet never materialize into anything even remotely meaningful for the country. They also smack of idioacy and leave out VAST searches of truth.

I’m all about transparency, seeking the truth, etc...




It appears you are "annoyed" by the truth at this juncture.

I am talking about that vast amount of truth you would have to ignore to call them 'overblown'.


For the record your ignorance is not our bliss.



posted on Feb, 3 2018 @ 05:32 AM
link   

originally posted by: proteus33
a reply to: the owlbear

there about 30 other political parties in us libertanian is first to come to mind. the democratic the party that split the union in the 19th century might just need to be replaced.

Yes, and with all the RINO's they need some major turnover in the R party or it should die too.



posted on Feb, 3 2018 @ 05:54 AM
link   
a reply to: Xcathdra

I doubt this is the entire thing. I hope that there is more to come. Either way, we are witnessing the end of an era.
Oh my. What a time to be alive.
This is perhaps the greatest movie of all time.




edit on rd2018000000Saturdayrd000000Sat, 03 Feb 2018 07:02:24 -0600fAmerica/ChicagoSat, 03 Feb 2018 07:02:24 -0600 by SoulSurfer because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 3 2018 @ 06:11 AM
link   

originally posted by: Xcathdra
Unconfirmed info -

FBI agents told McCabe they would testify in Flynn's defense stating they did not believe Flynn intended to mislead / lie. McCabe orders changes to the 302 document and then it was leaked to the media.


Flynn was completely set up by McCabe. Trump will pardon Flynn, no doubt.







 
169
<< 47  48  49    51  52  53 >>

log in

join