It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: SlapMonkey
originally posted by: mzinga
a reply to: Arnie123
Please... Even if Trump is holding a smoking gun his supporters will come up with all the standard excuses. It doesn't matter what the news is, they already have their mind made up that he is some sort of genius that can do no wrong.
Pitiful actually.
This entire story has zero to do with Trump, and everything to do with Flynn.
originally posted by: soberbacchus
originally posted by: SlapMonkey
originally posted by: mzinga
a reply to: Arnie123
Please... Even if Trump is holding a smoking gun his supporters will come up with all the standard excuses. It doesn't matter what the news is, they already have their mind made up that he is some sort of genius that can do no wrong.
Pitiful actually.
This entire story has zero to do with Trump, and everything to do with Flynn.
That is a strange perspective.
Flynn would not have been in a position to allegedly commit this crime if not for him being President Trump's chosen Chief national Security Advisor.
Nor was Flynn is a position to deliver on his promise to lift Russian Sanctions without the President's agreement.
Flynn's relationship with and status with Trump is precisely what enabled the crime. Otherwise none of it would be possible.
originally posted by: Eshel
a reply to: SlapMonkey
See, now the funny thing is, this is a quote from a post you had made earlier. With just a couple changed words, it proves my point. When people say things like this, it's ok. When faced with your own accusations, you get a little triggered. So, before you begin calling people "unintelligent" or question someone's credibility, perhaps a mirror would be valuable.
There is definitely something up with the Trump team and the questionable actions they have taken. Although I don't know the full facts, I am almost certain there'll be some high level repercussions. No idea how high level, we'll just have to wait and see on that.
If this turn out without anyone being convicted of some shady acts, then I'll gladly eat my hat.
And for those that make that claim that "nothing has been found by now - it should be closed". Keep in mind, it took 6 years for Starr to impeach Clinton. It's not a fast moving process. I, myself, prefer thoroughness to expediency.
originally posted by: SlapMonkey
a reply to: soberbacchus
Oh, so you want to employ the guilty-by-association tactic that holds zero relevancy in a court of law concerning illegalities. I see.
This is what we call a logical fallacy in thinking.
originally posted by: yuppa
a reply to: soberbacchus
you would have a point if Flynn was in power and sworn in when he said that.
originally posted by: Grambler
a reply to: soberbacchus
I agree, just because Flynn couldnt do the deal of lifting sanctions himself doesnt mean he couldnt have acted imporperly.
If he stood to gain money, then it would be worth looking into, right?
I mean, especially if the people accused of giving him money were known to be shady or share goals with shady people.
...
originally posted by: soberbacchus
Flynn, while involved in the Trump transition, worked with companies including ACU Strategic Partners to make a deal with Russia to build nuclear reactors in the Middle East
As President Donald Trump delivered his inaugural address, incoming-national security adviser Michael Flynn texted his former business colleague about a plan to join Russia and build nuclear reactors in the Middle East:
The project was "good to go," he told them, according to a summary of a whistleblower's account provided by a lawmaker.
The business colleague who texted with Flynn later recounted that he also suggested sanctions against Russia would be "ripped up" as one of the administration's first acts, according to the whistleblower.
Flynn had texted Copson with the same message -- that the nuclear reaction project was "good to go" -- from his place on the dais outside the Capitol 10 minutes into Trump's inaugural address, the whistleblower told Cummings. Flynn also texted Copson to tell his business colleagues to "let them know to put things in place," Cummings wrote.
Copson then told the whistleblower that Flynn "has been putting everything in place for us" and that the project would "make a lot of very wealthy people."
LINK
This is breaking across multiple sources.
If you don't like the source above, pick another.
The Whistleblower's interview has been handed over to Trey Gowdy for follow-up.
The plan was to make billions by selling US Nuclear Policy and Foreign Policy (Russian Sanctions).
Flynn as the incoming Chief National Security Advisor to the President had partnered with ACU Strategic Partners who were putting together a deal for Russia to build Nuclear Reactors in the Middle East.
With Trump as President, Russian Sanctions about to be "torn up", Flynn and (who else) were on track to as he put it "make a lot of very wealthy people."
This entire administration is in Russia's pocket.
Drain the Swamp my ass. The minute Trump took the oath, his Chief National Security Advisor was so giddy about cashing in on repealing Russian sanctions he couldn't wait until he left the stage to text his partners.