It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
It appears this is what Flynn planned. Did any of it happen?
The Senate voted overwhelmingly Thursday to pass a bill increasing sanctions against Russia, Iran and North Korea, establishing veto-proof majorities for the measure that also allows Congress to block President Trump from easing sanctions against Moscow.
The 98-to-2 vote sets up the president with a pivotal choice: veto the bill knowing that lawmakers are prepared to override, as his communications chief Anthony Scaramucci suggested this morning on CNN that he might, or sign the legislation that binds his hands when it comes to altering sanctions policy against Moscow
originally posted by: CrawlingChaos
2) I wonder where Russia had planned to get all the uranium they'd be fueling those reactors with. Clearly Russia would have a business plan in place to secure that much uranium, way before they started building....
I think it should be looked into.
originally posted by: AndyFromMichigan
originally posted by: CrawlingChaos
2) I wonder where Russia had planned to get all the uranium they'd be fueling those reactors with. Clearly Russia would have a business plan in place to secure that much uranium, way before they started building....
I think it should be looked into.
Heh heh. Looks like we'll never hear another word about this on the MSM.
originally posted by: soberbacchus
originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: soberbacchus
why only charge flynn with lying to the fbi if he did this?
In trade for bigger fish, bigger crimes.
It's the way it goes.
originally posted by: kurthall
TRUST me if this had Clintons name on it, we would have 4X the reaction here....LOL.....Honestly I think there are PAID Shills on this very website....
originally posted by: Eshel
a reply to: SlapMonkey
Could it be that, no matter what happens during his presidency, people like you (die hard-Trump folks, apparently) have your mind made up that he's not a massive criminal and can do no wrong, regardless of waiting for evidence or not?
If you want to contribute something intelligent to the discussion at hand (the story in the OP), I'd be happy to discuss it, but since the story itself and everything written in it has zero to do with Trump himself, I find it hard to find credibility in anything you just responded to me with.
originally posted by: yuppa
originally posted by: soberbacchus
originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: soberbacchus
why only charge flynn with lying to the fbi if he did this?
In trade for bigger fish, bigger crimes.
It's the way it goes.
This is to protect flynns son in actuality.
Mueller is writing evidence to implicate People with his powers.
mueller has a history of shady prosecutions under his belt.
originally posted by: yuppa
a reply to: soberbacchus
So the sanctions never were destroyed. making his charge he said she said with no proof of anything but his word,of a known liar of course.
originally posted by: chinesefatman
Since when did Flynn speak for Trump? Trump made it very clear Trump will lift sanctions on Russia as soon as Russia returns Crimea to Ukraine.
from March www.cnn.com...
from December www.cnn.com...