It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Teikiatsu
originally posted by: Abysha
originally posted by: Metallicus
a reply to: 1337Kph
I agree with you.
I would be much happier if the Pacific states and Atlantic NE were their own countries and would leave us 'fly over' folks alone.
THIS is where people like you and I find common ground.
I've always rooted for Texas when they start their hourly petition to secede. It's not just because I don't like Texas; it's because they'd be paving the way towards decentralizing an extremely binary nation.
It doesn't need to be so extreme. We just need to fall back to the intended federalism and let each state operate as its own 'sub-country' within the union and let the People decide what works and what doesn't.
That would mean reigning in the federal government, something that some people don't want to see happen.
originally posted by: Abysha
originally posted by: Teikiatsu
originally posted by: Abysha
originally posted by: Metallicus
a reply to: 1337Kph
I agree with you.
I would be much happier if the Pacific states and Atlantic NE were their own countries and would leave us 'fly over' folks alone.
THIS is where people like you and I find common ground.
I've always rooted for Texas when they start their hourly petition to secede. It's not just because I don't like Texas; it's because they'd be paving the way towards decentralizing an extremely binary nation.
It doesn't need to be so extreme. We just need to fall back to the intended federalism and let each state operate as its own 'sub-country' within the union and let the People decide what works and what doesn't.
That would mean reigning in the federal government, something that some people don't want to see happen.
Actually, you're kinda describing the general idea of the EU. Which was closer to what I think we were originally supposed to be.
- Shared currency
- Shared core rights
- National defense
Boom, done.
originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: Abysha
You really do not want his honest opinion on the EU. He deals with it's regulatory authorities professionally on a day to day basis.
You got his *nice* opinion.
originally posted by: tribal
a reply to: Aazadan
ok, find me a MSM article where they put Trump ahead of Clinton and for how long.
originally posted by: 1337Kph
Note; I'm not even from the US.
I can no longer see how the US will be able to remain a functioning country, let alone a super-power, when there is such a huge gap between beliefs of both political sides.
Sayings like "It's just political, nothing separates between us" have lost their meaning. People are not feeling belonging to a single country anymore. People are denouncing the flag, the anthem, and the very core of the United States.
There was never such a clash of beliefs in the history of the US since the civil war.
"Pluralism is the source of our strength". - A mistake. At this time this is pretty much your only weakness as a society.
originally posted by: Abysha
originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: Abysha
You really do not want his honest opinion on the EU. He deals with it's regulatory authorities professionally on a day to day basis.
You got his *nice* opinion.
Hah! I get it, anyway. I was speaking in generalities of what it was supposed to be like and how that vision would be a good working model for a stage sovereignty type of system here.
In other words, the spirit of the whole thing, not the present application of it.
I can no longer see how the US will be able to remain a functioning country, let alone a super-power, when there is such a huge gap between beliefs of both political sides.