It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: face23785
originally posted by: luthier
originally posted by: face23785
originally posted by: luthier
a reply to: face23785
You have no point.
Do you have kids?
There are ways to teach them to be responsible. Just in case your wondering.
One is through civics and history. This legislation wouldn't get passed if you held politicians accountable instead of act like a cheerleader.
Who has no point? Just because you don't understand something doesn't mean there's no point to it. What stunning and unjustified arrogance.
Sorry just like to pretend being proactive is better than whining I guess.
Your right like though it is everyone else's fault but yours.
Personally I will keep being a wrestling coach and trying to do my part making a difference in people lives instead complain about it.
You know you're way ahead when the other guy is complaining about you complaining.
originally posted by: alphabetaone
Well, no matter how you look at it, or which side you choose to align yourself with, the destruction of the confederate statue was just that, a statue...an inanimate object that doesn't live and breathe. Heather Heyer lived and breathed...yet no more.
I have a feeling a lot of posters here are missing the point, I doubt if even the people tearing it down cared much about it being there, this was blowback from the Charleston events of the weekend, who didn't expect it?
Yes, absolutely, the proper channels should have been used to remove the statue and preserve it elsewhere as a compromise and retain it's historical value, after all it IS historically significant and at least it causes someone (likely a kid) to ask questions: "Who is he or she? What did he or she do? Why is there a statue of them?"...those are important questions to answer and frankly to ask. Childlike destruction of ANY property though, historically significant or not is not a part of our American culture and we cant allow it to be. That's problem number one.
Problem number two is of a much greater significance and that is, if they DIDNT care much about the statue, then what are they fighting? I think the fight and the tearing down of that statue was a message, not an act of destruction they felt was needed...I get the impression the message was "go ahead and protect one statue, we'll tear two more down for everyone you white supremists protect". The larger problem, that being of a white supremist ideology which is rife with hate and violence should no more be espoused in America than the aforementioned, to me it is a larger problem than vandalism.
originally posted by: burgerbuddy
originally posted by: DBCowboy
A drawing of Mohammed is enough to offend the radical elements of Islam to kill others.
A statue, a work of art, a representation of a civil war character is enough to offend the radical elements of Idiocy to destroy it.
Didn't mohammed own slaves?
Interesting.
originally posted by: 4N0M4LY
Even the national guard on the state level where the civil war history runs deep. Like an example of the 29th Infantry Division - Stonewall Brigade will be reluctant to agree to putting down citizens that are about saving confederate history because like this unit, they were born from the confederates and have a very long history of honorable soldiers serving.
Good luck to the national guard units that deploy to join the madness.
originally posted by: Byrd
I expect to see more cities removing these statues because they don't want these rallies and protests. And after the violence of this weekend, I don't think that they'll be granting the neo-Nazis many parade or assembly permits. Policing something like this, even when non-violent, requires a lot of law enforcement personnel on the spot (and TRAINED ones, who know what's legal to do and what's legal to use.) Most places simply don't have the budget for it.
Removing statues is much easier than putting up with a number of demonstrations.
originally posted by: Grambler
originally posted by: Byrd
I expect to see more cities removing these statues because they don't want these rallies and protests. And after the violence of this weekend, I don't think that they'll be granting the neo-Nazis many parade or assembly permits. Policing something like this, even when non-violent, requires a lot of law enforcement personnel on the spot (and TRAINED ones, who know what's legal to do and what's legal to use.) Most places simply don't have the budget for it.
Removing statues is much easier than putting up with a number of demonstrations.
Ans so the mob violence works.
Well lets hope the neo nazis don't decide to start ripping down property they don't like. I mean, if townships will caave into leftists mob violence, then the neo nazis will think it can work for them too.
What a great precedent to have set!
originally posted by: Grambler
The problem is that this vandalism won't be the end.
You ignore that there were people engaging in violence against the rally too. And many of these leftists groups have been using violence and intimidation in attempts to silence anyone they disagree with for quite some time.
Of course we should denounce white supremacists; but the problem with them is overstated in my opinion.
In the name of fighting white supremacy, other supremacists have been allowed to flourish and have been celebrated. Almost every university in the country has courses decrying the evils of whiteness for example.
The real lesson learned here is that if you label your opponent a nazi or something similar, then you no longer are obligated to obey the rule of law, and not only will law enforcement watch you lawlessness, many people wwill celebrate you as a hero.
This will lead to more than just statues being attacked.
Check out comments on some of the other threads about how Trump supporters are nazis, and the white house is now ran by nazis.
originally posted by: neo96
originally posted by: burgerbuddy
originally posted by: DBCowboy
A drawing of Mohammed is enough to offend the radical elements of Islam to kill others.
A statue, a work of art, a representation of a civil war character is enough to offend the radical elements of Idiocy to destroy it.
Didn't mohammed own slaves?
Interesting.
Sure did.
There were other slaves here in 'Merica during the early years.
Fans of Black Sails and American Gods would gotten a taste of it.
Criminals sentenced to work in the new world which amounted to nothing more than slavery.
But hey now that's a very glossed over part they don't want to admit.
originally posted by: jimmyx
originally posted by: neo96
originally posted by: burgerbuddy
originally posted by: DBCowboy
A drawing of Mohammed is enough to offend the radical elements of Islam to kill others.
A statue, a work of art, a representation of a civil war character is enough to offend the radical elements of Idiocy to destroy it.
Didn't mohammed own slaves?
Interesting.
Sure did.
There were other slaves here in 'Merica during the early years.
Fans of Black Sails and American Gods would gotten a taste of it.
Criminals sentenced to work in the new world which amounted to nothing more than slavery.
But hey now that's a very glossed over part they don't want to admit.
admitting it is one thing, celebrating it is another...but you obviously don't know the difference, because white slaves weren't bought and sold like pieces of property. they also weren't whipped and lynched for 400 years by black masters, and white women weren't raped by their black masters for 400 years....
originally posted by: jimmyx
originally posted by: neo96
originally posted by: burgerbuddy
originally posted by: DBCowboy
A drawing of Mohammed is enough to offend the radical elements of Islam to kill others.
A statue, a work of art, a representation of a civil war character is enough to offend the radical elements of Idiocy to destroy it.
Didn't mohammed own slaves?
Interesting.
Sure did.
There were other slaves here in 'Merica during the early years.
Fans of Black Sails and American Gods would gotten a taste of it.
Criminals sentenced to work in the new world which amounted to nothing more than slavery.
But hey now that's a very glossed over part they don't want to admit.
admitting it is one thing, celebrating it is another...but you obviously don't know the difference, because white slaves weren't bought and sold like pieces of property. they also weren't whipped and lynched for 400 years by black masters, and white women weren't raped by their black masters for 400 years....
originally posted by: JimTSpock
originally posted by: Grambler
originally posted by: Byrd
I expect to see more cities removing these statues because they don't want these rallies and protests. And after the violence of this weekend, I don't think that they'll be granting the neo-Nazis many parade or assembly permits. Policing something like this, even when non-violent, requires a lot of law enforcement personnel on the spot (and TRAINED ones, who know what's legal to do and what's legal to use.) Most places simply don't have the budget for it.
Removing statues is much easier than putting up with a number of demonstrations.
Ans so the mob violence works.
Well lets hope the neo nazis don't decide to start ripping down property they don't like. I mean, if townships will caave into leftists mob violence, then the neo nazis will think it can work for them too.
What a great precedent to have set!
The KKK and neo nazis are only a tiny tiny number of people compared to the total population, they are completely irrelevant. I doubt we will see much more trouble from them.
The SJW types are much larger in number and are everywhere by comparison. My 2c.
originally posted by: matafuchs
Mobilized. So do you still think they are not busing these people in. Do you know who else did this? Yup. Nazis.....so if someone does not like something they can remove it. Even from public property.
Slippery slope here folks....
originally posted by: jimmyx
originally posted by: neo96
originally posted by: burgerbuddy
originally posted by: DBCowboy
A drawing of Mohammed is enough to offend the radical elements of Islam to kill others.
A statue, a work of art, a representation of a civil war character is enough to offend the radical elements of Idiocy to destroy it.
Didn't mohammed own slaves?
Interesting.
Sure did.
There were other slaves here in 'Merica during the early years.
Fans of Black Sails and American Gods would gotten a taste of it.
Criminals sentenced to work in the new world which amounted to nothing more than slavery.
But hey now that's a very glossed over part they don't want to admit.
admitting it is one thing, celebrating it is another...but you obviously don't know the difference, because white slaves weren't bought and sold like pieces of property. they also weren't whipped and lynched for 400 years by black masters, and white women weren't raped by their black masters for 400 years....
originally posted by: 4N0M4LY
originally posted by: jimmyx
originally posted by: 4N0M4LY
Even the national guard on the state level where the civil war history runs deep. Like an example of the 29th Infantry Division - Stonewall Brigade will be reluctant to agree to putting down citizens that are about saving confederate history because like this unit, they were born from the confederates and have a very long history of honorable soldiers serving.
Good luck to the national guard units that deploy to join the madness.
so...black people of America....can't you celebrate a treasonous southern slave owner trying to keep you as slaves??.....c'mon, don't you like working for free 90 to 100 hours a week, whipped bloody if you get out of line, lynched if you try and escape?.....and as far as black women, hey....any white man can rape them, with no worries....what a glorious and grand confederate history EVERYONE should celebrate!!!!
LOL. Your so full of crap, one X-Lax pill would make you disappear. Go shove bricks mainstream media zombie.