Beware Parents - Canada's new 'gender identity' law.

originally posted by: Kromlech
More backwards lunacy from the left. Children are the "parents" now. LOL, a 6-year-old knows what's best?

Taking children away just because they were told "no?" THAT IS ABUSE.

Lrn2read. Seriously. You make yourself look incredibly foolish. Read the actual Bill and if you don't feel like reading that, read the thread. What you're saying makes absolutely no sense as the entire thread was debunked 6 days ago. They're not taking away children willy nilly because a parent disagrees with their gender identity. Again, read the stuff you're posting on before you post.

Nothing to see here.

The only thing to see is you bringing a dead thread back to life.

a reply to: Kromlech

More backwards lunacy from the left. Children are the "parents" now. LOL, a 6-year-old knows what's best?

Taking children away just because they were told "no?" THAT IS ABUSE.

It shouldn't surprise us though should it? This has been coming for a long time and it's not ended yet that's for sure.

Remember when spanking was the norm? Kids back then had respect for their elders, community, etc.

Nowwwwwww, 'I'll call social service on you'...

And look at what kids are like now.

I'm generalizing - there's a lot more that's happened other than the above - we know that. I do agree children have become the parents and it's not right at all. Not right.

Kids need love and sometimes that means tough love.

peace

originally posted by: silo13
a reply to: Kromlech

More backwards lunacy from the left. Children are the "parents" now. LOL, a 6-year-old knows what's best?

Taking children away just because they were told "no?" THAT IS ABUSE.

It shouldn't surprise us though should it? This has been coming for a long time and it's not ended yet that's for sure.

Remember when spanking was the norm? Kids back then had respect for their elders, community, etc.

Nowwwwwww, 'I'll call social service on you'...

And look at what kids are like now.

I'm generalizing - there's a lot more that's happened other than the above - we know that. I do agree children have become the parents and it's not right at all. Not right.

Kids need love and sometimes that means tough love.

peace

Even as the OP you didn't even read the information you were posting about. This entire thing was debunked. You used your own personal opinions to push a partisan agenda. When it came to be FALSE, you completely ignored it and continued to spew nonsensical B.S. Your overly dramatic generalizations were debunked in their entirety and you have no one to blame for your own foolishness aside from yourself

And spanking? Really? You think spanking is okay? This isn't the NORM anymore because spanking has been proven to cause more long-lasting harm than good. Jeez, you never cease to prove you do absolutely NO research before spouting off about things.

www.apa.org...

"Many studies have shown that physical punishment — including spanking, hitting and other means of causing pain — can lead to increased aggression, antisocial behavior, physical injury and mental health problems for children. "

.....

"Physical punishment doesn’t work to get kids to comply, so parents think they have to keep escalating it. That is why it is so dangerous"

......

"Physical punishment can work momentarily to stop problematic behavior because children are afraid of being hit, but it doesn’t work in the long term and can make children more aggressive, Graham-Bermann says.

A study published last year in Child Abuse and Neglect revealed an intergenerational cycle of violence in homes where physical punishment was used. Researchers interviewed parents and children age 3 to 7 from more than 100 families. Children who were physically punished were more likely to endorse hitting as a means of resolving their conflicts with peers and siblings. Parents who had experienced frequent physical punishment during their childhood were more likely to believe it was acceptable, and they frequently spanked their children. Their children, in turn, often believed spanking was an appropriate disciplinary method.

The negative effects of physical punishment may not become apparent for some time, Gershoff says. “A child doesn’t get spanked and then run out and rob a store,” she says. “There are indirect changes in how the child thinks about things and feels about things.”

See. There. I did the research for you. It took me an entire 5 seconds.

originally posted by: Deaf Alien
a reply to: LadyGreenEyes

Yep if it is suspected that the child is being abused due to not getting the prroper help for it. As I have stated a parent can disagree with homosexuality and yet still support and nurture their gay child.

So, you even admit that it would be called "abuse" if the child wasn't being encouraged to embrace a mental problem. You are supporting my position.

originally posted by: Deaf Alien

originally posted by: LadyGreenEyes

originally posted by: Deaf Alien
a reply to: LadyGreenEyes

So you don't advocate counseling for children with gender dysphoria? See that's why this bill exists.

Counseling of what sort? I'd certainly recommend counseling, but I am certain you and I would disagree as to the purpose and goal of said counseling.

And if the counseling doesn't go your way then what?

If it doesn't go your way, then what??

FOX news on the Canadian bill.



The beinging of the video to tic to 4:48

peace

originally posted by: silo13
FOX news on the Canadian bill.

The beinging of the video to tic to 4:48

peace

Ridiculous video. More judgmental, nonsensical, unfounded Christian doom porn.

The title says it all:

"END TIMES SIGNS: YOU WON'T BELIEVE THIS?!"

You're right. I won't believe it. SMH

a reply to: silo13

wait so the government can take away my child because I wont indulge his or her desire to dress in different clothes for a month ?

pretty #ed up , I thought it was the right of every parent to determine what happens to their child up until the age of consent, now it appears not so

originally posted by: sapien82
a reply to: silo13

wait so the government can take away my child because I wont indulge his or her desire to dress in different clothes for a month ?

pretty #ed up , I thought it was the right of every parent to determine what happens to their child up until the age of consent, now it appears not so

Oh, look, another person who posts without reading the thread.

OP was shown to be a hoax. Just dramatic agenda pushing.

The actual Bill (if you actually read it) does not say children are going to be taken away willy nilly. Actual abuse would have to be shown. Merely not accepting the child is not considered abuse. Children are not going to be just taken away from their parents. There's nothing to worry about.

Read before you post. Don't simply assume OP actually knows what they're talking about. Because they don't.

Nothing to see here.

a reply to: sapien82

Yes, actually.

There are those who don't want it to be true but just because they repeat themselves using many words does not make their opinion true.

This is not a hoax.

It's been reported on in every major MSM outlets and of course more.

People who are in the know much more than I agree this is a clear threat to parents families and the core of what makes all Nations great - personal choice in how you raise your own children.

peace

I have zero problems with gay, lesbian, transgender people as adults. But I have serious issues when they start pushing the issue with children especially when those children are going through chemical and physical changes (puberty). I personally believe all routes should be exhausted to the fullest before a child chooses to make a massively life altering decision you cant go back from. should you decide to take such route...whats done is done. If after you have exhausted all outlets and that is really your LAST option then fine. But if jimmy says he wants to be a girl and jimmy's parents aren't willing to do so until he's older and has the knowledge and cognitive ability to understand that all sales are final (figure of speech) it is solely up to his parents until of legal age to engage in a contract. Now should we be more understanding and compassionate toward said individuals of course we do. But all I see on MSM is the glorification of issues that are heartwrenching. Government really does need to sit this one out.

a reply to: kaylaluv

I hope you realize that all 50 just about of our states are conservative and bleed red......its the cities in those 50 states that bleed blue

originally posted by: MissCoyote
But I have serious issues when they start pushing the issue with children especially when those children are going through chemical and physical changes (puberty).

That's exactly what hormone blockers are for.

They delay puberty (physical changes) until child becomes of legal age.

Hormone blockers have shown no lasting side effects if the choice is made to discontinue.

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: MissCoyote
But I have serious issues when they start pushing the issue with children especially when those children are going through chemical and physical changes (puberty).

That's exactly what hormone blockers are for.

They delay puberty (physical changes) until child becomes of legal age.

Hormone blockers have shown no lasting side effects if the choice is made to discontinue.

Oh the marvels of science.

originally posted by: ReyaPhemhurth

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: MissCoyote
But I have serious issues when they start pushing the issue with children especially when those children are going through chemical and physical changes (puberty).

That's exactly what hormone blockers are for.

They delay puberty (physical changes) until child becomes of legal age.

Hormone blockers have shown no lasting side effects if the choice is made to discontinue.

Oh the marvels of science.

That isn't the marvels of science. More like the manipulations of science by humans with an agenda. The marvels of science would be letting what is ,grow naturally in the state of what it was created in.

originally posted by: Sheye

originally posted by: ReyaPhemhurth

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: MissCoyote
But I have serious issues when they start pushing the issue with children especially when those children are going through chemical and physical changes (puberty).

That's exactly what hormone blockers are for.

They delay puberty (physical changes) until child becomes of legal age.

Hormone blockers have shown no lasting side effects if the choice is made to discontinue.

Oh the marvels of science.

That isn't the marvels of science. More like the manipulations of science by humans with an agenda. The marvels of science would be letting what is ,grow naturally in the state of what it was created in.

Don't pass off your opinions as facts.

It's still science. Whether or not you think it's a marvel is subject to your opinion.

As it was said, there have not been any recorded adverse reactions to those who discontinue.

Saying it's a manipulation is like saying airplanes are manipulations because it's not natural for humans to fly.
The agenda you're speaking of is no different than crying unnatural manipulation because of your God agenda.

I stated my opinion, never said it was fact.

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: MissCoyote
But I have serious issues when they start pushing the issue with children especially when those children are going through chemical and physical changes (puberty).

That's exactly what hormone blockers are for.

They delay puberty (physical changes) until child becomes of legal age.

Hormone blockers have shown no lasting side effects if the choice is made to discontinue.

Please show the data and long term published findings for this assertion. Otherwise, it's your baseless opinion.

originally posted by: ReyaPhemhurth

originally posted by: Sheye

originally posted by: ReyaPhemhurth

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: MissCoyote
But I have serious issues when they start pushing the issue with children especially when those children are going through chemical and physical changes (puberty).

That's exactly what hormone blockers are for.

They delay puberty (physical changes) until child becomes of legal age.

Hormone blockers have shown no lasting side effects if the choice is made to discontinue.

Oh the marvels of science.

That isn't the marvels of science. More like the manipulations of science by humans with an agenda. The marvels of science would be letting what is ,grow naturally in the state of what it was created in.

Don't pass off your opinions as facts.

It's still science. Whether or not you think it's a marvel is subject to your opinion.

As it was said, there have not been any recorded adverse reactions to those who discontinue.

Saying it's a manipulation is like saying airplanes are manipulations because it's not natural for humans to fly.
The agenda you're speaking of is no different than crying unnatural manipulation because of your God agenda.

I stated my opinion, never said it was fact.

And I disagreed with your opinion never once using the word fact... but I have to say your plane analogy was very lame and totally missed the mark on what I was saying about manipulation of the natural scientific process a human body goes through.. with the outside use of hormones.

originally posted by: Sublimecraft
a reply to: silo13

Prepare yourself - this is the intention of the globalists like Soros, a borderless cesspit of humans forced to think only one particular way or become social pariahs.

"You will accept the power bestowed upon minorities - or we will take your children away"

Think only one particular way?! Are you kidding me? The problem is that they're being forced into thinking in about 80 different ways on a binary subject - Male or Female.

This subject and that bill is just friggin ridiculous.

a reply to: silo13

Trudeau is an idiot, I can only hope he's turfed next election.