It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: ManFromEurope
a reply to: D8Tee
If there is no global warming, there will be no rising of the sealevel.
Then, he does not need that wall to protect his golfcourse against the rising sealevel as they won't rise.
/s
The important conclusion of our study is not that the data sets we analyze display small sea-level decelerations, but that accelerations, whether negative or positive (we reference studies that found small positive accelerations), are quite small. To reach the multimeter levels projected for 2100 by RV requires large positive accelerations that are one to two orders of magnitude greater than those yet observed in sea-level data.
originally posted by: ManFromEurope
a reply to: UKTruth
If there is no global warming, there will be no rising of the sealevel.
Then, he does not need that wall to protect his golfcourse against the rising sealevel as they won't rise.
The world is easy.
/s
originally posted by: Kryties
How absolutely disgusting.
Thankyou, oh Trump supporters, for helping to destroy the planet. That's real nice of you. I see most of you are pleased with this result - I hope you remain pleased while the rest of the planet slowly but surely withdraws all support from America and leaves you lot to fend for yourselves - to which you'll surely complain when you start to feel the effects of it and to which we will reply "WE TOLD YOU SO".
You people disgust me. You selfish, backward fools.
originally posted by: Kryties
a reply to: UKTruth
Not much point explaining ANYTHING to fools
originally posted by: D8Tee
You don't fool anyone taking that tactic.
You know nothing about the agreement and you know little about climate science.
originally posted by: OtherSideOfTheCoin
a reply to: Kryties
Trying to talk to these people is like having a conversation with your dog, they make a lot of noise and wag their tales but have very little in the way of comprehension
originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: Kryties
Funny. All this outrage and the best excuse is .....well there isn't one now is there.
When confronted with the simple question; what part of the Paris Treaty harms the planet, is asked. Nothing!!!!
originally posted by: Kryties
Not much point explaining ANYTHING to fools who believe pulling out of Paris Accord is a good thing. The information is out there, easily found and read, but clearly you fools don't want facts - you would rather go with whatever sounds good in your own heads.