It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Like how natives thought technological advances were gods.
Particularly if we destroy ourselves in the process of becoming gods so there is no record of our existence to the future generations except folklore.
originally posted by: spy66
a reply to: luthier
There is no room for multiple infinites. There is only one void of Space that can take up absolutly all Space.
Finite is not infinite, but it takes up Space within the infinite void. Finite is also formed by the infinite void, therefor finite must exist within the infinite void of Space.
That is what my images prior actually show.
originally posted by: Observationalist
a reply to: luthier
Like how natives thought technological advances were gods.
So for your argument to work it requires ignorance.
Particularly if we destroy ourselves in the process of becoming gods so there is no record of our existence to the future generations except folklore.
We must create Ignorance to become gods.
We have created so much that it would seem impossible to remove all the evidence of our past to the point where we think technology is a god.
Back the there was very little of human created objects. That's why making Idols was a big deal. When they made stuff it wasn't just for s#itz and giggles, thier creations had much more meaning to it.
I can't imagine future humans finding an old whoopie cushion and thinking wow look, the god of farts.
originally posted by: TzarChasm
originally posted by: spy66
a reply to: luthier
There is no room for multiple infinites. There is only one void of Space that can take up absolutly all Space.
Finite is not infinite, but it takes up Space within the infinite void. Finite is also formed by the infinite void, therefor finite must exist within the infinite void of Space.
That is what my images prior actually show.
but what does that actually mean? there is no practical application of the model you are describing.
originally posted by: luthier
a reply to: spy66
Your response has absolutely no meaning. It's gibbersish.
You mix concepts of math, english, and philosophy to prop up your paper tiger argument.
originally posted by: spy66
a reply to: luthier
Infinite is not a number its a sybol. It is a idea actually. Sicence cant prove its existance, but knows it exists.
The infinite can not be calculated. It is a absolute that is why it is a sybol.
originally posted by: TzarChasm
originally posted by: spy66
a reply to: luthier
Infinite is not a number its a sybol. It is a idea actually. Sicence cant prove its existance, but knows it exists.
The infinite can not be calculated. It is a absolute that is why it is a sybol.
what cannot be measured cannot be confirmed. infinity has not been measured in its entirety so it cant be absolute because it has never been recorded. sorry.
originally posted by: luthier
a reply to: spy66
Yak yak yak...
Substance less bs.
What are you even yammering in about?
Are there absolutes? You have no idea and neither does anybody else.
We have ideas that appear to be true. What your having trouble with here is the bias of the observer. You can't get your head around reality.
It's constituted by your observations. That is all you can know.
Your in a perpetual cave watching shadows. If your facade wants you to believe you are fully aware then so be it.
There are no absolutes within Our finite universe.
And it only seams that it is i who can wrap my head around this. You for sure are not fallowing. Now go back to sleep.