It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by dgtempe
Ok, since there was some victory today in Iraq as far as voting and the democratic process, I would say there is no stopping George W. Bush now in his quest for world domination.
What say you?
Originally posted by DrHoracid
If it means giving up one single freedom, then
Originally posted by Kidfinger
Originally posted by DrHoracid
If it means giving up one single freedom, then
Better hope you are never deemed an enemy of the state
Originally posted by ShadowXIX
If the US had any such intentions it would have happened after WW2 and being the only ones with Atomic weapons there would have been very little to stop them.
[edit on 30-1-2005 by ShadowXIX]
From the Los Angeles Times
Voting ends in Iraq; attacks kill 36
Amid incessant death threats from insurgents, voter turnout in the Sunni stronghold of Ramadi was the poorest of any major Iraqi city despite a massive effort to assure the safety of voters by U.S. and Iraqi forces.
Turnout was light throughout the Al Anbar province, but the sparse turnout did not stop military commanders from calling the day a success.
Originally posted by dgtempe
Ok, since there was some victory today in Iraq as far as voting and the democratic process, I would say there is no stopping George W. Bush now in his quest for world domination.
What say you?
Originally posted by DrHoracid
Originally posted by dgtempe
Ok, since there was some victory today in Iraq as far as voting and the democratic process, I would say there is no stopping George W. Bush now in his quest for world domination.
What say you?
As long as "world" domination means the extermination of all terrorist, then let him go for it. If it means making Kerry and Teddy finally shut their mouths, the go for it. If it means taking ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN completely off the airwaves forever, then go for it.
If it means giving up one single freedom, then
Originally posted by ShadowXIX
If the US had any such intentions it would have happened after WW2 and being the only ones with Atomic weapons there would have been very little to stop them.
[edit on 30-1-2005 by ShadowXIX]
as posted by dgtempe
Seekerof, Bush's satanic rituals pay off, dont they.