Earth Sister, I've been an experiencer since 1995, thousands of hours of ongoing communications. In my case, without abductions. Instead, given my
role in a semi-public human telepathic community (that has spread as an alternative to oppressive state intrusions like Watergate and the
assassinations) the interactions occur within a larger community that is witness to such. One highly informative alien (non-federation) said that "at
least 30,000 have to" follow the interactions, for various reasons. Given the explicit, ongoing nature of same (hints about science, off-world
politics and other helpful info, sometimes provocative, for humans), there is sustained interest.
You seem to want to impart to me the essential nature of your interactions. I, too, interacted with federation aliens initially, but it was all
observed and commented upon at intervals, by non-federation aliens (the vast majority in this galaxy and in Andromeda, the galaxy with which we'll
merge in some 3.5 billion years, to form a large ellitpical, or round galaxy). My sources are good and I know federation aliens well, even some veiled
critics among them. They fear to express themselves, due to the overbearing agenda of the IFSP. So, I know them and certainly have disputed with
Verdants. I remotely probe their craft regularly, not a technological scrutiny but a political and investigative probing--they have committed crimes
and are in violation of basic standards here. Sure, they are more advanced than the typical Wall St. orgy of self-interest, but they have their own
kind of arrogant, destructive tendencies. I know grays, but I know other, more advanced aliens. Here's part of a chapter I'm writing about
hyperversals, a vastly more advanced population of much greater extent. It's the first publicly written treatment of its sort (several pages). It
will help you understand how those federation aliens figure in the larger context. I'll post this section in a separate thread of its own, later.
It's too new (and controversial) to bury this low in a different thread.
Hyperversals: a New Category of Aliens?
For years now, experiencers have written about a category of extraterrestrials who so greatly exceed aliens like the grays, for example, that
descriptions sometimes fall short. Such aliens have been described as “non-physical” or hyper-dimensional. In Jim Marrs’ book Alien Agenda,
government-trained remote viewers report that such aliens are physical but derive from a succession of universe cycles---they originated during
previous universe cycles (something like a previous universe, but not exactly). Instead, according to such reports, they’re all part of the same,
overall universe. To make this all possible, the universal continuum, itself, would have to be much older than 13 billion years.
Cosmologists have toyed with the idea of a re-cycling universe, yet until articles about negative energy and marginally faster-than-light physics were
published during recent years, a re-cycling universe was largely considered impossible. All evidence pointed toward one tiny singularity at the
beginning of time. From such perspective, there was nothing--there could have been nothing before that first, zero moment. The problem with such
models was that they’re all based on scant knowledge about black holes, in the first place.
More recently, the notion of a multiverse--a succession of interconnected,
or inter-dimensioning universes, has been advanced by cosmologists. String theorists suggest that a previous “brane,” a sheet-like fabric of time
existing in a previous universe, could have connected with our “brane” to cause the current universe to come into form. US science journals are
fairly conservative in speculating about a multiverse, preferring to limit their articles to sketchy notions about a fifth dimension, or mathematical
models of extra dimensions (i.e. “branes” as some string theorists call them).
Non-US magazines like New Scientist discuss multiversal possibilities much more freely, i.e. Marcus Chown’s well-reasoned excursions into the
subject. In New Scientist, another British scientist argued that a new model of physics could be premised on a more flexible notion of time, alone.
Yet another suggested that during a previous universe cycle, aliens endangered by a waning energy condition could have engineered a new universe into
being. He didn’t suggest how they might have done so, but other theorists, i.e. Steven Hawking, have suggested that by manipulating the energy vs.
negative energy status of a black hole, a kind of white hole could conceivably be created. In short, the old Einstein limit could be exceeded. *See
Michio Kaku's article on escaping to another universe, at prospectmagazine.co.uk...
Hawking even theorized that particles, or quanta (discrete packets of energy), could escape from a black hole if “negative energy” fluctuations
caused by “tidal shifts” within a black hole allowed particles to briefly exceed the speed of light and escape the black hole---provided, of
course, they slowed down for an equally brief period of time after escaping the event horizon.
For years Hawking bet colleagues that no information, no recognizable pattern within such quanta, could escape a black hole. Then, in 2004, Hawking
reversed himself and admitted that he’d probably lost the bet. New models showed that information (a kind of order) contained within what goes into
a black hole, could, in fact, escape from a black hole, although Hawking suggests that we might not be able to decipher it, given the mainstream
assumption that there are no faster-than-light physics (an assumption that aliens say is incorrect).
So, although theorists like Hawking are still debating whether we might be able to see a “naked” singularity, a physically detectable black hole
that somehow exceeds its event horizon, the question of whether black holes have a measurable “memory,” of sorts, has now come into mainstream
scientific play. The possibility that information can somehow be cycled through black holes is now discussed by internationally recognized theorists.
(See Scientific American, Nov. 2004) This has far-reaching implications.
For example, as was noted earlier, if, toward the end of a given universe cycle (its habitable stability), aliens were to coordinate their actions
universally, they could post electrogravity craft near all black holes in the universe in order to create a new universe cycle. By sharply tilting the
energy vs. negative energy balance of all such black holes at the same time, they could cause them to “bleed into” a white hole, a new universe.
Remember Tom Bearden’s reciprocity--discussed in earlier pages? It says that when light converges from three different directions so that it cancels
out, the energy bleeds into electrogravity, and conversely, if electrogravity converges so that it cancels out, it bleeds back into light waves.
Believe it or not, that may be the basic recipe for creating a new universe. By posting drone ships near black holes (massive reservoirs of negative
energy) while removing all participating aliens to contained craft far out in space, a new universe could be created. Any civilization that did so
would no doubt wait until this universe was nearing the end of its habitability. To do so would be a major feat and would have enduring political and
For example, all aliens with primitive technology would probably be killed by the creation of a new universe. Presumably, only aliens with advanced
electrogravity technology would be able to survive such a transition. And where would they get such technology? It would likely have been created by
aliens who had to shield themselves in order to survive the shock and radiation of supernovas and hyper-novas (when black holes combine--as happens
when galaxies merge, for example). It would also have been refined by aliens who moved to small, icy planets where an electrogravity field had to be
effected in order to contain an atmosphere and do terra-forming (stabilizing an atmosphere, plus a water cycle) to allow for habitation.
In short, the creation of a new universe would be an awe-inspiring, beautiful moment, but would be fraught with contradictions and the need for all
advanced aliens to both coordinate, and act together at the very same moment. Peaceful coordination on such a scale doesn’t just happen by itself.
It would have to be accomplished. It would require humility, a shared vision of all participating aliens in the universe. All such aliens would have
to reduce their numbers in order to survive the moment. Greed and violence would have to be overcome.
So, what would be the main theme among such beings? Once again, a shared ecology—not a piggish scramble for real estate. Living within an already
inhabited, hyper-advanced universe, any humans who might think that greed is the best way to get ahead of the alien pack would probably be seen as
weird, undesirable primitives. According to numerous aliens’ reports, the die is already cast, so it’s either shape up, or perish---no reckless
Those who suspect that this discussion about hyperversals is headed in a certain direction are correct.
On May 6, 2004 one apprehensive population of hyperversals initiated explicit contact here, in no uncertain terms, by stating that, yes, they did
originate during a previous universe cycle. As far as I know, this was the first time such aliens had gone semi-public in announcing their existence.
Certain official sources here, on Earth, had previously hinted at such beings, i.e. in one rumored French government report. *By the way, the French
government has been less impaired in publishing its findings about aliens, i.e. the French defense ministry’s COMETA report.
Years earlier, an unusually advanced (non-federation) alien had almost casually remarked, here, that the Verdants are seen as efficient ciphers,
scribes who tend to, and compile data that more advanced aliens can later draw on, and compile. This was stated in passing, but was starkly different
from previous alien remarks, both in character and nature. At the time, we, humans, were trying to put what we were seeing into larger, coherent
perspective, so I assumed the individual was either unusually presumptuous or that something was going on that far exceeded the Verdants. In fact,
there had been other remarks of the sort, statements that coolly and confidently put the Verdants in their place, as though the alien(s) making the
statements had large-scale insights of some unknown sort.
For example, one day several years ago while I lay awake in bed, the more advanced (than Verdant) aliens demonstrated their capabilities by seeming to
change both the nature and the order of time-- its very structure right before me as I lay, eyes closed but "watching” attentively! Years later,
another hyper-advanced alien explained that they had simply looped time in more complex ways. For years prior to the event, I’d interacted with
aliens closer on the evolutionary scale to humans, so I wasn’t one to be unduly impressed by basic, off-world capabilities and electrogravity. But
the looped-time incident was vivid and deliberate---far beyond the capabilities of gray-federation aliens (a fact that gray-federation aliens seemed
to acknowledge later), and was done to make a statement of some sort. It essentially took the lid off of the Verdant-imposed ceiling over humankind.
Apparently, there were more advanced others--of some unspecified sort.
Back to the morning of May 6, 2004, years afterward: I awoke on May 6 after a sleep interruption routine done by federation-related aliens when
someone such as myself stands out for criticizing their activities. The night before I’d been involved in an argument during which I firmly, but
reluctantly warned “grays” that humans have a right to defend against the same type of scheme that appears to have killed the original gray planet
(reportedly in the Large Magellenic Cloud), which furthered Verdant predations there. As a critic of Verdant provocations, I felt it necessary to
state a sorely obvious truth about the current human circumstance.
For years, I’d argued the grays’ case re the Verdants while investigating the manipulated-conflict scheme that alien sources say Verdants imposed
on the original gray planet. I’m seen as unusual for having done so. More noteworthy, of course, are the efforts of alien individuals who go out of
their way to report on the subject. My investigations into Verdant doings are more explicit than those of most humans. In part, this stems from
ongoing help and information offered by sympathetic, non-federation aliens, some of which is noted in previous chapters.
Again, on the night of May 5, 2004 I’d warned grays that humans could logically be expected to use lethal force to ward off abductors working a
takeover and possible planet-killing Verdant scheme, here. It was the first time I’d “spoken” so bluntly, and I discerned that various aliens
attending to the exchange felt that a critical threshold had been reached.
Little did I know who would respond, later…
Early the next morning, I was awoken and critiqued (the usual kind of communicated exchange) by a hyper-advanced alien I’d previously criticized for
acting like “the boy in the bubble” by offering comments from highly advanced, yet idealized remove from the Verdants’ brutal scheme here. The
hyper-advanced alien was clearly more evolved than the Verdants, yet seemed to loft any argument about Verdants into cryptic, large-scale terms,
attributing a seemingly round quality to such considerations. Given Verdant violations here, I’d expected more trenchant legal distinctions, at
least some tacit acknowledgement that humans had valid grievances.
Then, quite unexpectedly, the given alien admitted that his population had evolved before what humans call the Big Bang! He also hinted that the
current universe cycle had been engineered, in part. As far as I know, it was an historic first: a semi-public admission that life had existed in
great numbers during a previous universe cycle. In short, if the report is correct, the universe is much older than a mere 12-13 billion years. Then,
in order to demonstrate that the story was told in earnest, the alien opened up the entire context of previous, related demonstrations, noting that
they were the work of his kind. The experience had the same depth, a very different feel from the coarser, more crudely framed Verdant doings.
Later that day, one of the hyperversals showed a graphic “visual” record of how it was for them to sit in a contained hyper-environment as our
current-cycle universe was initiated--billions of years ago. In the visual, a crowd of aliens stood within a large, contained space. Overhead was a
large, orb-shaped electrogravitically-effected shield at the moment when the old universe was manipulated to initiate a new cycle, a new extension of
the then-failing, old "universe."
The subject was treated with deep gravity, a most somber message. Those who witnessed this were awed; we’d never imagined anything like it. The best
approximation would be to imagine that you live on a small planet or a very large, rounded, artificial "craft" at the exact moment that a big
supernova, or worse yet, a big hypernova (caused by combining black holes) occurred—which would kill everyone, were they not shielded.
In the hyperversal’s graphic, a momentous, apprehensive pause ensued as they watched the dome above rush with reddish white color, some vast,
cataclysmic event--described as the initiation of a new universe cycle. Ironically, this resembled a contained hyper-weathering of a super/hypernova
and appeared to involve fades of body, like those described by Elders when they travel at faster-than-light speeds. Tense, eerie quiet ensued, a
collective pause of an extraordinary sort as the moment(s) passed.
Of course, humans found this profound and deeply wrought with implications. It was one of those days that you remember for life (where you were when
it happened), not only a significant marker of a major sort, but an explicit cause for redefining considerably more. Nonetheless, we were on the watch
for simple-minded, lolly tendencies in view of such, the inability of some humans to maintain their acumen beyond such a threshold, to hold up their
critical awareness. Although it was a profound moment in the history of human-alien interactions, I nonetheless walked the hyperversal who initiated
the contact through a series of questions.
Mindful of the context in which the given hyperversal had initiated explicit, open contact as a hyperversal (at a moment surrounding remarks about a
human defense against the federation scheme, here), I noted the above-noted elite human “direct” operatives (one a Swiss-French arms manufacturer
and former mutual funds owner established in the US, the other a leading Jewish financier in Europe—a family that rose to wealth when Napoleon was
defeated) who reportedly further the federation scheme, here. The hyperversal alien suggested that I shouldn’t verge on the notion of violence
toward grays. Apparently a non-sexual of a seemingly gentle sort, he suggested that the gray story was a complicated one that merited deeper,
moderated reserve. I said I hadn’t advocated harming the grays, but had argued otherwise for years, mindful of the Verdant-related debacle that
killed the grays’ home planet---as a result, grays lost what will probably be the only mature, naturally evolved biome that will ever be allowed
them. Due to their misfortune, the grays are perpetual guest-dependents, crudely used by the Verdants.
The hyper-advanced alien who initiated contact is part of a population I now refer to as the –X3’s ( “-“ for negative energy users, “X”
for hyperversals, and “3” for the fact that they don’t merely work via a positive-negative energy scheme, but appear to have refined a third,
more complicated dynamic). The -X3 alien/spokesperson replied that a human collective premise will arrive at some vaguely gray-like status, over time,
irregardless of short-term human choices. I countered that –X3 fails to make basic, legal distinctions, that –X3’s cohort population isn’t
actively engaged here, nor is –X3’s cohort doing basic, day-to-day physical duty, here. One of –X3’s related associates, using a staged
Verdant-related filter, countered that I, myself, am not yet “effective” in correcting certain problems here (human violence, inequality, etc.). I
countered that further time is necessary to both propagate and evolve a more advanced planetary basis to correct such problems.
I said that Verdants propagate conflict, essentially enslaving grays through lies, deception and destruction—which allowed a corrupt, overgrown
population of sexuals (the Verdants) to lead nonsexuals (grays), which could be dangerous. –X3 replied glibly and without detail, saying that humans
would arrive at some collective premise, anyway---essentially rationalizing that violently schemed Verdant ends justify the means, perhaps… At this
juncture, other aliens, some of a hyperversal character, offered critiques of –X3. This was greatly helpful, in that we, humans, were essentially
over our heads in a subject about which we knew little.
I now refer to the hyperversals who criticize the –X3’s as –Xn’s (n for a possible extra integer and/or character). The –Xn’s are another
group of hyperversal who are either equal to, or more advanced than the –X3’s. Again, one must remember that, after an entire universe cycle,
there would then have been many very advanced aliens, yet some would derive from different origins, different systems. Some would be more
independent-minded, more rigorous in their thinking than others, i.e. those from collectives that might, at times, favor the bland generalizations of
a given community.
–Xn said that the –X3’s had directed Verdants to our location in the Milky Way, effectively aiding the Verdants in initiating activities here.
–Xn also noted that –X3’s group deliberately tips Verdants off about the location of some newly technological planets like our own, hence the
–X3’s apparently rationalize that some planets will be killed—which could, in some ways, accommodate certain of the –X3’s. One or more
–Xn’s elucidated that some of the –X3 population’s associates do so as a deliberate strategy. At this juncture, –X3 was listening
attentively and had ample opportunity to correct -Xn if this were untrue, but he didn’t—which may be tacit admission that the allegation was true
(in alien community of mind communications, honesty isn’t merely optional, it is required—dishonesty is easily detectable because it lacks
coherence and has a failed, seemingly more physical, anatomical character).
As was later pointed out by one of the -Xn ‘s, the -X3's are clearly physical and have water-based bodies. The –X3’s have whitish skin and
large, fairly rounded heads. They are bipedal, with two eyes and a body that is more sturdy than the grays. They appear to be taller than the grays.
Their elbow and knee joints are unusually rounded, more circular and sturdy than are those of the grays. The –X3’s and the -Xn ‘s both defer to,
and appear to interact with a larger host of other hyperversal populations. Indeed, some of the other hyperversals are so advanced that they challenge
one's notion of possibilities. For example, one (or more) of them later demonstrated an ability to literally pose what would happen, or would have
happened were a human (myself, in this case) to have chosen unwisely/unecologically at a given moment. In a literally awesome display, the hyperversal
(not a -X3, by the way) drew upon a variety of time horizons, of sorts, to specifically elucidate what would happen to a human (various outcomes) were
bad choices made. The strange part of the demonstration was that it appeared to bend time around, to reach both back and forward in time, in order to
do so--across a multiplicity of "event horizons.” No federation alien has demonstrated such a capability, to my knowledge.
More importantly, the other, conceivably more advanced (than -X3) populations appear to be more capable than the –X3’s, yet are more finely,
deeply integrated into the continuum. Some of their existence and/or doings appear to dimension right through us and our surroundings, in that other
universe cycles appear to either echo through ours in a different direction of time, or co-exist within ours--with much larger implications. Perhaps
you, the reader, have witnessed extraordinarily intelligent manifestations of hyperversal consciousness communicating sentient implications of right
and wrong, good ecology and analysis vs. bad. The reason you may have witnessed such is that hyperversals can both ghost, and see through, the
activities of lesser aliens. They can do so without leaving much trace. Their capabilities leave one thinking that the old notion of physical limits
is a most specious pretension. We all inter-dimension, apparently, hence many our old 20th century conventions are drastically invalid, inadequate.
Again, to return to that first May 6, 2003 interaction with hyperversals: Mindful of my concerns about recent, federation manipulations in US history,
–X3 posed that Kennedy and Johnson were simply (in context of the 1965 Indonesian genocide and the US assassinations) tools of elitist indifference,
a failed violent strategy. I countered that Verdant-related Biderman-DuPonts were the worst of same, to begin with (this is widely, specifically known
off-world, hence I wasn’t dropping a new idea into the mix). Later –X3 allowed that the Verdants could be wrong in their strategy, of course. At
the time, I was looking for diversity of origin and outlook among the –X3’s (after various other hyperversals’ critiques had been noted, which
was encouraging). –X3 argued that the grays played a vital role in introducing humans to advanced concepts, collective considerations and, of
course, genetic/nonsexual considerations, etc. I countered that our non-destructive, non-colonizing, non planet-killing neighbors may do that
better—without a self-interested colonial mobbing up the situation.
I argued that our best strategy is to reduce population, to work toward a better ecology than Verdants exemplify. I argued the concept of basic,
universal law (laws common to all societies) and specific adjustments, allowing for both evolution, and regeneration in certain cases. In reply, –X3
tended toward generalities, i.e. bland remarks about our probable ultimate collective reckonings, anyway. *–X3 said we don’t need to kill grays
(for whom –X3’s have some liabilities), that, instead, we can prevail through informed awareness (this was stated with emphasis).
Two or more other –Xn‘s critiqued –X3, who I accused of failing to make basic distinctions re Verdant mass crimes against humans. One sharply
worded –Xn critique of the -X3’s involved a fleshing out of -X3’s argument, that if we (the larger, non-Verdant convention) correct Verdants and
cohere on a larger scale (at the time –Xn was both dimensioning through, and pulling out the clear truths of the –X3’s) that we would
potentially be “more capable” because “we would (potentially) be able “to return to” the next universe cycle. This was an important, if not
epochal, point. –X3 was thus posed, honestly and truthfully, as arguing from the position that the Verdant scheme would foul our collective
large-scale convention, disallowing our large-scale capability, and thus preventing us from returning to existence via the next universal cycle (to be
effected at some future date).
Wary of any –X3 assumption that might condemn humans to failure, I followed up on the subject at intervals. Later, one alien associated with the
–X3’s asked (re the Verdants): “Do you know what they later become?” –hinting that the federation may be tasked with end-of-cycle duties.
Other hyperversals attending to the exchange noted that, using a genetically engineered filter hybrid (who seems to have human characteristics), the
–X3’s had previously argued that any use of electrogravity, here, took away from –X3’s system’s vital duration, dimming the minds/lifetimes
of their progeny by shortening the lifetime of their calculated cycle. The individual was trying to argue that excess use of electrogravity would
endanger the sensitivities of yet more-advanced hyperversals.
This was done with a melodramatic flare, as though a hyperversal child would be endangered--dimmed out at a vulnerable time. Knowing that Verdants
squander vast amounts of energy at the expense of other peoples, I preferred to wait for better, more scientific evidence. Later, a less dogmatic
hyperversal admitted that if humans were to opt for a conventional energy strategy, coupled with tightly limited, fine-scale use of electrogravity,
such usage would threaten hyperversals no more than a falling stone upon a mountain might threaten a human.
So, I raised the basic question: Can we not all share? Later, the next night, this opened up a coherent human community consideration of same.
To help walk humans through the stiffly posed conundrum of the –X3’s first explicit interactions, here, one of the –Xn’s argued that –X3
fails to dimension time as we all must, hence –X3 argues a blandly generalized bias against this universe cycle’s lifeforms. In other words, are
we all lumped into the undesirable category?
Again, taking time away from my normal working routine (for obvious reasons) I returned the conversation to questions of basic ecology, population
reduction and non-violence—basic neighborly considerations. I had one lingering question about the –X3’s: whether the –X3’s are
“capable” of sorting out disputes in our neighborhood in terms of the pending merger of the Milky Way-Andromeda community vs. the bizarrely
manipulative Verdant scheme, here, at the moment. In this regard, some of the –X3’s appear to be both vulnerable to, and can be held to, basic
honesty. We all agreed that life must be shared and respected, but the –X3 premise and their Verdant links throw a cruel and calculated bone into
So, is the –X3’s premise elitist (albeit a commonality)? In response, –X3 says the –X3’s are more consistent. The question is open to
further consideration, but the competing hyperversal’s report about the “more capable” and “return to” assumption lingers. –X3 may not be
able to see the present, all-of-time implications of indirectly propagating Verdant crimes and not exposing them, not organizing a better response.
Moreover, the disproportionate size of the Verdant population and their rake of vulnerable peoples suggests that the –X3’s may have failed to curb
an epic offender, if indeed they ever even intended to do so, in the first place (although they may have a two-handed policy re the Verdants). At
present, the Verdants seem to have reached their own sustainable limit, yet they continue to reproduce sexually and intrude upon, then deprive
numerous lesser populations of resources. The Verdant case, coupled with the –X3’s compromised posture, suggests that, in this part of the Virgo
supercluster, the –X3’s may be one of the universe’s less effective hyperversal populations, a strangely situated trading collective. The
inference owes to the disastrously oversized and predatory habits, the sheer self-inflated greed of the Verdant population.
The question remains as to whether a kind of deal was struck with the Verdants, one that may be regarded as having compromised our neighboring
populations. Worse yet, at times the –X3’s appear to view newly-evolved populations in basically prototypical terms, to lapse into a coldly
distanced forgetfulness about their own essentially animal “nature” and origins.
On the other hand, the –Xn readiness and timeliness in countering certain –X3 assumptions poses a kind of hope within the –X3 context, yet such
hopes are only as good as is human resistance to the Verdant scheme, here (which, at the moment, has assumed epic proportions). In other words, humans
are caught within a kind of fail-safe duality: we either overcome the animal tendencies of our most corrupt, planet-destroying elites (some of whom
are described as “direct” federation operatives) or we could easily perish. Apparently, more advanced populations don’t leave much room for
primitives to propagate outward and threaten the universal ecology.
One critique aired by a competing alien at this juncture was that the –X3’s consider all current cycle aliens as primitive, if not dangerously
undesirable, hence their prototypical treatment of humans, as a people.
In view of the above, it appears that we need to work out a better human awareness of basic hyper-dynamics, the actual history and implications of a
more deeply inhabited universe. For example, given the –X3’s aloofness and prototypical mindset, we may need to field a tighter legalistic, more
deeply communicated collective response to Verdant-like abusers of the local ecology. On the other hand, the simple existence of a secure hyperversal
community like the –X3’s has implications that could transcend the fear-mongering predations of the Verdants.
On balance, this and other evidence for the existence of advanced, hyperversal aliens suggests that we live in a universe that is much smarter than
had previously seemed possible. As for myself, I’m but one small part of a community of like-minded others who study this kind of situation closely.
I’m impressed by the smooth and attentive humility of the many humans who witnessed the above, the clean, clear way that collective human reasoning
has developed in such regard. (Note: several months ago, one of the –Xn’s stated that, due to the nature of the interactions to which I am party,
at least “30,000” humans and others “have to” keep track of the interactions, to some extent. Given the fact that such interactions stand out,
in semi-public profile due to ongoing alien inputs, I’m not surprised to hear such a number quoted.) In years past, had someone either posed the
actual facts of what is now happening, both here and elsewhere on the globe, I would have marveled at both the events and the order, the humble
clarity with which they have occurred, the absence of any weirdly backward human interlocuters. In this regard I’m encouraged to see that humankind
is proving to be a gentle, promising people, despite our currently-manipulated conflicts.
Even before the hyperversals manifested openly, here, I had suggested that it is meaningless for humans to re-invent the stone, so to speak. Instead,
I encouraged others to pick up in terms of (and with) the best and most advanced of all contemporary aliens (anywhere), to try as best we can to not
go back, thereafter. Apparently, the lessons of other kinds aren’t lost on us---transformations of the sort profoundly change the thoughts of those
who understand, yet must somehow communicate their understanding to others.
I should note that the information in this book hasn’t come to me easily. Instead, it followed after years of struggle, direct federation deceptions
and misrepresentations. In the process, I’ve endured daily spats--both with federation aliens and with one contingent of –X3-related others (some
hybridized and used as filters to obscure their –X3 controllers) who at times try to steer humans into the Verdant fold.
The –X3-related contingent’s prime, stated reason? To effect a human change from sexual reproduction, to non-sexual, in order to put humans on a
more ecological footing.
In addition, during various arguments, political and scientific information sharing, and more, I was shown that grays used electrogravity to kill US
soldiers who attempted to prevent roughly 60 grays from escaping captivity in an underground US base some years back. This was demonstrated by
elevating an electrogravity field inside my own head, while a friendly, non-federation alien commented on the process—saying that the grays escaped
by psychotronically coordinating an energy weapon activated from outside, not by simply using their thought waves. I felt sharp pain due to sudden
pressure pushing outward from within all of my brain structure. On another occasion, what appeared to be a –X3 hybrid enclave used electrogravity to
put a kind of delta t freeze (slowing of time by electrogravity) on my liver function, causing deep pain there for days, after I’d mentioned that
the Verdant strategy toward Earth smacked of “a war-like tactic.” I was advised to discontinue remote probing of the Verdants’ main ship while a
“potentially lethal” use of energy was being directed toward me. I held off for about 10 days. (*I should note that, at the time, I was smack in
the middle of sharply worded, direct exposures of Verdant doings, here, which proved extremely embarrassing for them (exposures partly informed by
Over time, now that I’m able to distinguish –X3 related communications from those of other aliens, I’ve come to see that the –X3’s can be
highly manipulative, themselves. They prefer to ghost the Verdants, in part to give humans a direct, unmistakable taste of what the Verdant collective
is actually like, or could be expected to do, were humans to capitulate. In part, the –X3’s see a need to tend to the situation. Without a doubt,
the –X3’s and other hyperversals see the Verdants as being less evolved than they are. Hyperversals tend to act as though Verdants don’t pose a
major risk to them. Nonetheless, hyperversals stress that humans shouldn’t act in ways that might allow the Verdants remote entry to, hence the
opportunity to copy, hyperversal technology for which the Verdants might not be responsible. The consequences could be fatal, both to humankind, and
other populations, given the offenses of the Verdant regime.
More importantly, hyperversals appear to live in or near every major galaxy in this universe. My basis for reporting this is not mere conjecture.
Instead, this has been stated, over and over again by hyperversals. As such, they probably trade with lesser collectives like that of the Verdants.
This poses a risk to humans, in that should we fail, our system could, conceivably, be cannibalized by both Verdants and hyperversals, Verdants taking
nearby planets where they have reportedly stationed their enclaves, for example, or the –X3’s taking what’s left of Earth and habitable bodies
like Mars or the Jovian/Saturn moons. To some this may sound like a far-fetched assertion, yet aliens have repeatedly stated that a biologically
mature gem like Earth is relatively rare.
Given that hyperversals appear to both inhabit and influence galaxies like our own, further questions arise. For example, do the –X3’s distance
themselves from evolving populations such as ours in order to avoid being asked for direct help in cases of conflict? If such were the case, they
wouldn’t have to concern themselves with posing actual, physical aid to lesser populations, like ours. Of course, the hyperversals would be
reluctant to do so, as is consistent with their intent to cultivate responsibility among any population, plus their need to veil as much of their
technology and capacities from the greedy hands of populations like the Verdants (who pose the most direct outside threat to human survival, at the
At times, I’ve detected a hint of genetic elitism among the –X3’s and their associates. Sometimes it almost seems as though their hyper-advanced
technology allows them to coast along on autopilot. At times I’ve noted –X3’s acting with a kind of “fill factor” presumption: the mistaken
notion that they can scan out all of the intelligent implications in the space-time surrounding a situation like that of Earth. This can cause a –X3
to lapse into self-centered, singular misconception, as though they occupy or are equal to all that they can access---which is preposterous. As one
–Xn critic of the –X3’s noted, some of the –X3’s more distressing shortcomings can be attributed to their basic “biology,” their animal
origins. The pre-noted security section somehow affiliated with the –X3’s sometimes hews so closely to the Verdant routine that I have to
re-examine a given interaction closely to sort out which group was trying to stump humans, causing them to lapse into low-order, concretized notions
of life: the given security section, or the Verdants?
In retrospect, the so-called hyperversals are a conundrum. Their statements turn our cosmology on its head, yet their abilities and breadth of
awareness clearly indicate a much-more-than-gray/Verdant capability, a higher degree of advancement. In the end, the existence of hyperversals
suggests that a kind of river runs through our universe, a multiversal continuum that somehow re-dimensions at the fringes of our physical notion of
concretes. Apparently, time is not a one-way, linear river. Instead, it is multi-dimensional. This offers the hope of human assimilation into a much
more refined, shared order of being, over time.
[edit on 6-2-2005 by gl2]
[edit on 6-2-2005 by gl2]
[edit on 6-2-2005 by gl2]
[edit on 6-2-2005 by gl2]