'Space federation', page 3

EarthSister,

I've checked your website and find on it nothing peculiar, just commonsense, that is as it would be to someone who is open, loving, creative and fearless to the embrace of our ET friends, actually cousins, as it were IMHO, as we as a race on Earth as likely as not came from ET sources.

The intuitive and the skeptic need one another, otherwise it's just both sides preaching to the converted, we need both sides of the coin please... and...lots of tolerance thank-you.

I personally have chosen in this life to be an intuitive, and although not very psychic yet, certain gifts that I seem to have a predisposition for are developing it seems. In the meantime I like the kinds of information that the skeptic (in me) can find nourishes the soul. For example:

Scientists have identified galaxy "clusters," of typically four to six neighboring galaxies that tend to be located within a few million lightyears. These, especially if spiral in nature, gradually over millions of years tend to merge into one connected galaxy, and the distance between them may tend to gradually diminish at a certain rate. Supposedly M31, M33, and our Milky Way galaxy, all spirals BTW, appear to be behaving as a cluster would, only having just three instead of the typical four to six in number this observation has been labeled as a 'modified cluster.'

One aspect of SisterEarth and TerraX (the latter of whom I have had the pleasure of being able to corresponded with here and on another forum) sharing their POVs here in this forum may be that they each have a piece of a puzzle that the soul needs to bring to the awareness of many others: whether others are replying to or reading or not even consciously aware of the posting at all. Not merely some sort of personal validation need but rather a strong impulsion to share for those of us for whom "faith is the evidence of things unseen." Just as the skeptic reports on what has happened or is happening and may be ignored or kept secret and discerns with clarity what may or may not be.

I commend the skeptic. And there are many here on this part of the forum, who may be drawn by the same 'inner knowing' and can help those of us with more direct access to hone our theories as they begin forming from the fog of ignorance we all operate in. Thanks for the discernment we could all sure use that!

If I get a channeling that resonates with me, not just a fanciful 'what if' scenario, but a real 'that is happening or will happen in my reality that i share with all of you', then i will try to share it. And may feel the need to support those who do.

Again, all honor to the skeptic as well. You will debunk whatever you feel led to or care to without personal regard to the opinions of the presenters of the information on such an open forum as this.

As far as the particular space civilizations interacting with their nearby 'neighboring' galaxies, as EarthSister shares here and on her website--and yes, the nearest two galaxies and clouds have to be considered neighbors IMO--that theory just logically assumes that other planets have similar intelligent forms of life only more advanced in many respects. Certainly the first to breakthrough and make formal contact with our governments will have reflected the militaristic appearance and function of most of them. Although on Earth the nations are still at war there is a chance of open contact (previously individual in nature) with benevolent ETs at the end of February when there will be an attempt to declare peace with Iraq. These are probabilities on a timeline not subject to my personal belief and yet not yet factual certainly either.

Going further with my own sources of information, my own first lifetime, assuming that one subscribes to the notion of reincarnation and would then kindly admit the possibility of lifetimes in other places than Earth, is in the Pinwheel Galaxy (M33). (One reference book for discussing the various points of light visible to Earth and their consciousness relative to ours, that I have found valuable in my researches, is Starlight Elixirs and Cosmic Vibrational Healing, channeled by Jon Fox.) This type of information may be closed to the skeptic here. To give a non-personal example to anyone on this forum, a person with a skeptical mindset on another forum (Sciforum.com, in the 'Pseudoscience' section) once in attempting to dismiss a contact experience that another member was trying to share, said that he had had pastlife dreams that did not mean anything. Well they did mean a lot to others. What they revealed was that this person had had some intense psychic abilities in pastlives, and that these were misused, in fairly obvious ways, and the result may have been such that the soul in this lifetime chose to be a skeptic of anyone claiming to have psychic experiences--such as contact with advanced ET races--or anything else for that matter. I'm NOT saying here that all skeptics have a block on what are natural abilities due to karmic debts from mistakes and the soul has chosen to shut down. Some of the greatest scientific minds have been skeptics, particularly making the greatest breakthroughs when they can become skeptical even of their own skepticism, so to speak IMO.

BTW this is not the first place I have heard of such channeling as SisterEarth's. I think another book reference I can give here would be "The Only Planet of Choice", channeled by 'The Council of Nine' represented by 'Tom' (IMHO likely an entity like Jane Roberts' 'Seth', consisting of over 1000 souls gathered together in a gestalt version of the channel's higher, future, or 'ascended' self) via Phyllis Schlemmer, which came from within a trance channeling group that included Gene Roddenbury (the creator of Star Trek) at one point. That book warns as a general rule against contact between Earth and our same-galaxy ETs. More evolved choices would be made (it was stated) in contacts with ETs that included those outside the Milky Way.

(This latter is just one example of another source of information that happens to resonate with me and may be shared in the context of this discussion, perhaps for the skeptic to attack the weaknesses of and the intuitive to feed on the strengths inherent within. And all ultimately for the benefit of all IMHO.)

If someone has a feeling that certain information may be right, that is an exercise of the intuition. A person of another opinion might feel free to challenge that person's intuition and neither may be wrong, just different approaches to the pursuit of truth.