It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Was Pagliano's Contempt of congress part of a greater play? If so, what purpose would you speculate that it would serve? How close do you suspect that the house is to uncovering the corruption there?
...
A: Pagliano's absence to Congress was very deliberate. The plan is to give every person close to HRC immunity and have them lay low and "run out the clock". Then once she gets elected, she will pardon herself and everyone involved, then we will be able to release their testimony. By that time, no one will care, or so they think. We already have his testimony as to what happened, we refused to turn it over to Congress. That's why we put the poor new guy in front of Congress when they asked for the 302's.
Q: When it comes to the Clinton Foundation and the Clintons using it as a personal bank account, is there anything you can tell us that we might have overlooked?
A: The CF always operates in countries where birth records are difficult to maintain. Let that sink in for a moment.
originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: JohnnyElohim
Hillary and Huma can just release all their emails that were sent from unclassified, non-government servers.
There wouldn't be any damaging or classified information on it (because that would be illegal) and settle the whole thing.
originally posted by: flatbush71
a reply to: burntheships
Preet Bharara the " Terminator ", hehe
originally posted by: BlueAjah
a reply to: queenofswords
Where did you get the Oct. 3rd date? I have not seen confirmation of when the FBI had the evidence.
I wonder how long the DOJ was stalling on the search warrant before Comey took action.
Keep in mind that the NY police probably had the evidence first, then turned it over to the FBI when they found Huma government emails. I have not heard what that timeline is.
www.seattletimes.com...
On Oct. 3, FBI agents seized several electronic devices from Weiner: a laptop, his iPhone and an iPad that was in large measure used by his 4-year-old son to watch cartoons, a person with knowledge of the matter said. Days later, FBI agents also confiscated a Wi-Fi router that could identify any other devices that had been used, the person said.
originally posted by: jadedANDcynical
Here's a question.
Why would they need a warrant if they already have the devices in their possession due to an 'unrelated case?'
If you're investigating a crime and find evidence of a different crime, I thought anything found was fair game to the second crime as long as all of the paperwork was straight for the original crime?
originally posted by: jadedANDcynical
Here's a question.
Why would they need a warrant if they already have the devices in their possession due to an 'unrelated case?'
originally posted by: JohnnyElohim
originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: JohnnyElohim
Hillary and Huma can just release all their emails that were sent from unclassified, non-government servers.
There wouldn't be any damaging or classified information on it (because that would be illegal) and settle the whole thing.
Why would you preemptively release piles of correspondence that were originally intended to be private so that they could be picked over by dishonest and hostile sophists?
originally posted by: EmmanuelGoldstein
It's coming up!
Oh my god!
Not this Tuesday, but the next.
Oh my god it's going to be here soooooooon!