With just 70 days till election, Hillary hire’s former Trump ghost writer and psychology experts.

a reply to: buster2010

I think he's going to point out that people in her office are under investigation for connections with Russia too, what failures of trumps compare to Benghazi, the beating the FBI gave her and her blatant lies under oath?

a reply to: Indigo5

There is no "false image" to be restored??

Doesn't stop her from trying...

Main street America is comfortably numb.

originally posted by: UnBreakable
Why not just go into the debates and stomp Trump on the issues?

You answered that yourself...

originally posted by: UnBreakable
He knows she'll out-debate him on the issues

Next!

You can't figure out why she hired someone who knows Trump intimately? Really?

originally posted by: avgguy
a reply to: buster2010

I think he's going to point out that people in her office are under investigation for connections with Russia too, what failures of trumps compare to Benghazi, the beating the FBI gave her and her blatant lies under oath?

You mean the things she has already been cleared of? Trumpy is going to have to do better.

Lol, yea let's debate the policies she plans to implement. Not like anyone will recognize them after she allows her special interests to water them down to the point of being unrecognizable.

We see where the "status quo" has brought us:

Continue the War on Terrorism
Continue with ACA
Open borders
Extreme waste in government
Extreme corruption in government
Unaccountability of government funds (6.5 Trillion I believe)
Pay to Play
More Gun Control
Restrictions to Freedom of Speech
Dividing the population
BLM
Dreamers

I mean it's just ridiculous at this point. I hope Trump hammers away at her corruption. As much as I dislike Trump, he's pretty likable when I see Hillary as the opposition. I'm voting against Corruption and that's it...Go Trump.

a reply to: amicktd

Sure ... let's debate it ...

what is the "status quo" of what Republicans have stood up for, passed and implemented these last six years?

*cricket chirps*

*lonely tumbleweed blows through*

... oh that's right ... nothing.

a reply to: Gryphon66

Well if you would have read the entire post, instead of your knee-jerk reply with no substance you would have read this:

As much as I dislike Trump, he's pretty likable when I see Hillary as the opposition. I'm voting against Corruption and that's it...Go Trump.

It's sad I have to quote myself so often for you dedicated liberals.

originally posted by: Benevolent Heretic

You can't figure out why she hired someone who knows Trump intimately? Really?

Yes, I know that. But if you bothered to read the rest of my post I state "I think it will turn a lot of people off to her if she spends her time trying to elicit Trump tantrums than how to improve working people's lives and demonstrating the poise and gravitas it takes to occupy the office". She should rise above Trump's level and prove she has a handle on what's important to the country rather than trying to prod the bear. It would be great karma if it backfires on her.

a reply to: amicktd

Your post regards your rather one-sided view of issues ... of what you referred to as "status quo" ...

Mr. Trump would be the nominal leader of the Republican party if elected President.

(sorry, I always have to take a few moments to laugh when I type or say that ...)

My post addresses what the Republican party has accomplished in recent history, which is nothing, nada, big zero, empty set, null, non-existent.

Who cares who you're voting for? You supposedly commented on the issue at hand; I answered your "claim."

originally posted by: amicktd
a reply to: Gryphon66

Well if you would have read the entire post, instead of your knee-jerk reply with no substance you would have read this:

As much as I dislike Trump, he's pretty likable when I see Hillary as the opposition. I'm voting against Corruption and that's it...Go Trump.

It's sad I have to quote myself so often for you dedicated liberals.

I know, I just had to do the same. Libs attention spans are good for only the first sentence.

originally posted by: buster2010
What better way to win a debate than to make your opponent lose it on stage? It's not like Trump would be any sort of challenge at a debate so why not have fun with him.

Hillary's bladder might be a challenge to her though. I wonder if she will she disappear backstage again during a commercial break? Trump's not a challenge? I think keeping all those skeletons stuffed in her bulging closet might be considered quite a challenge when Trump blows the door off it. It will look like a bomb went off at the graveyard when Trump's done with her.
I can't wait.

a reply to: Gryphon66

Your post regards your rather one-sided view of issues

Who's side isn't 1 sided? Especially with these 2 candidates.

Mr. Trump would be the nominal leader of the Republican party if elected President.

(sorry, I always have to take a few moments to laugh when I type or say that ...)

Don't worry I laugh hearing Hillary as a leader of the Democratic party, but I don't understand what the point of this sentence was so moving on.

My post addresses what the Republican party has accomplished in recent history, which is nothing, nada, big zero, empty set, null, non-existent.

As someone who doesn't support the RNC, I ask you the same question since you obviously support the DNC. Seems the only thing the Dems have brought us is a broken world lately and no worries, I know the Republicans have done their share of damage as well. But off the top of my head I can't think of anything good either party has brought us. Hence the fact I don't support either.

Who cares who you're voting for? You supposedly commented on the issue at hand; I answered your "claim."

I care who I'm voting for and why. I hope what I say will make people think about the different perspectives in this election.
I've seen your answers to me lately and it's lacking with anything I can take away from it. This was literally your answer to me:

*cricket chirps*

*lonely tumbleweed blows through*

So you tell me why I should even consider taking anything you say seriously, because you seem like a troll based on that post.

originally posted by: UnBreakable
I thought she was a great debater.

Have you actually watched Hillary debate? There is a reason she hasn't held a press conference in 200+ days.
It's one of the primary reasons she lost in 2008 and 2012. Made a total fool of herself.
That and the democrats needed to keep the plantation under control and putting a black man in office was more beneficial to that narrative than. But that's the topic of another thread all together.

Sixteen people got under his skin, he came back with unsavory comments, and he dispatched them all.

I will rephrase that for you.
"Trump got under the skin of 16 corrupt neo-con's and slayed them in the debates as he dispatched them all."

Against all odds I might add. The democrat race was really only 2 people and Hillary had a hard time putting old man socialism to bed. You all honestly think she stands a chance against someone who already destroyed 16 people who use similar tactics?

Instead of highlighting her supposedly superior knowledge of the issues, she seems to be expending all her time on debate prep on what makes Trump tick.

Supposedly is right! I have yet to see this "superior knowledge" of anything in regards to anything. Meanwhile Trump continues to literally predict terrorist attacks and economic strife. She seems to be spending most of her time donning a tinfoil hat these days and attacking "alt-right" entities as she calls them a vast conspiracy to demonize her. Mentioning Alex Jones was just the icing on the cake. It shows just how desperate and delusional they really are if their script won't even stay on script.

Trump is going to demolish her in the debates!

originally posted by: JAY1980

originally posted by: UnBreakable
I thought she was a great debater.

Have you actually watched Hillary debate? There is a reason she hasn't held a press conference in 200+ days.
It's one of the primary reasons she lost in 2008 and 2012. Made a total fool of herself.

I said it because that's all I hear from the Hillary sycophants, that's she's such a great debater. I was trying to give her the benefit of the doubt. Although I failed to see the superiority in '08 when she debated Obama, or even against a 74 year old curmudgeon this go around.

originally posted by: UnBreakable

originally posted by: JAY1980

originally posted by: UnBreakable
I thought she was a great debater.

Have you actually watched Hillary debate? There is a reason she hasn't held a press conference in 200+ days.
It's one of the primary reasons she lost in 2008 and 2012. Made a total fool of herself.

I said it because that's all I hear from the Hillary sycophants, that's she's such a great debater. I was trying to give her the benefit of the doubt. Although I failed to see the superiority in '08 when she debated Obama, or even against a 74 year old curmudgeon this go around.

Damned if she does - - Damned if she doesn't.

This is all getting really boring.

d/p

a reply to: UnBreakable

She has to be ready. Is Trump going in planning on answering questions without digging at her? That would be a big fat no.
She knows how he "debates" we have the videos. There is no grass growing beneath her feet. She's getting ready. She wants to cause him to have one of his famous melt downs on national tv. It will be epic.

Preparation boys. That's what she's doing. Preparation.

a reply to: DAVID64

Oh that's hilarious.

a reply to: UnBreakable

That's pretty much been her campaign so far. Every commercial I've seen for her has been about what Trump says. I've yet to see one single thing about her stance on anything. You almost have to go out of your way to find it. So, I did! She wants to repeal the Hyde Act... so get ready to pay for everyone's abortions!

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: UnBreakable

originally posted by: JAY1980

originally posted by: UnBreakable
I thought she was a great debater.

Have you actually watched Hillary debate? There is a reason she hasn't held a press conference in 200+ days.
It's one of the primary reasons she lost in 2008 and 2012. Made a total fool of herself.

I said it because that's all I hear from the Hillary sycophants, that's she's such a great debater. I was trying to give her the benefit of the doubt. Although I failed to see the superiority in '08 when she debated Obama, or even against a 74 year old curmudgeon this go around.

Damned if she does - - Damned if she doesn't.

This is all getting really boring.

You're so bored, yet you come here. Your life must be as exciting as a melting glacier.