It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

EXCLUSIVE: Hillary Clinton Scheduled To Meet With FBI On Saturday

page: 9
65
<< 6  7  8    10  11  12 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jul, 2 2016 @ 11:51 AM
link   

originally posted by: RedDragon


It is on center stage TV.. every news channel right now.




July 4th weekend, lots of folks outside and this is the
biggest travel holiday of the year, equals very low viewers.

It will still hurt her.




posted on Jul, 2 2016 @ 11:51 AM
link   
I'm glad that she was finally interviewed. It shows progress.
But I am a little disappointed.
Where were the handcuffs?



posted on Jul, 2 2016 @ 11:51 AM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

I'm here and confident this is behind now. I have no doubts.



posted on Jul, 2 2016 @ 11:54 AM
link   
a reply to: Sillyolme


I'm here and confident this is behind now.


Yep, the spin is, "the interview has happened, every thing is all done and past. Let's move on now."

She will be campaigning with Barack Obama on Tuesday.

MSNBC talking head is focusing solely upon the email server and how it "wasn't illegal."



posted on Jul, 2 2016 @ 11:56 AM
link   
a reply to: burntheships

It was private . They are not televising the interview. .
They are talking about it and lynch and comey



posted on Jul, 2 2016 @ 12:00 PM
link   
a reply to: BO XIAN

Ok, if Hillary didn't do anything illegal, she certainly did not follow proper procedures. To connect, she must have approval. There is a process, IATO, IATC, risk assessment, CAP, hardening, etc.

www.disa.mil...

If I were to connect without DISA approval, I at the minimum would loose my job, and likely prosecuted. I would not be here talking about it.

I hope she does get in trouble. As far as who is elected, there is no difference who is. There would be no changes in policy, there never is, I have been watching this since Kennedy. The candidates will go on talking about all the changes they will make, which is just talk. It comes down to who you would prefer to see on your television for four years. Clinton damages my eyes. I really wish we had more choices.

J



posted on Jul, 2 2016 @ 12:01 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: xuenchen

I'm here and confident this is behind now. I have no doubts.


I fully expect that no charges will be filed and a whole lot of people are going to crap themselves.

Are you ready for the #storm?



posted on Jul, 2 2016 @ 12:01 PM
link   
a reply to: BlueAjah

For an interview?

If on the far far off chance they found wrongdoing then you still have a few years before you ever see that.
Grand jury inquest, indictment, discovery (could take years of depositions) trial...oh and of course conviction.
Can you wait?



posted on Jul, 2 2016 @ 12:02 PM
link   
a reply to: introvert

I have to agree.
Ill be surprised if they charge her.
Ill be humble and say I was wrong.



posted on Jul, 2 2016 @ 12:04 PM
link   
a reply to: AtypicalJ

I think it's obvious she did not follow proper procedure, but that is not enough, historically, to press charges against her.

The JD rarely prosecutes cases like this unless very specific conditions exist.

Here is a good read on the topic if you are interested.

www.politico.com...



posted on Jul, 2 2016 @ 12:05 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: introvert

I have to agree.
Ill be surprised if they charge her.
Ill be humble and say I was wrong.


I'll say I was wrong as well, if she is charged. It's the honest thing to do.

Now what if she is not indicted? Will those that have proclaimed her guilt be honest and admit they were wrong, or are we going to hear about the "conspiracy" for years to come?

My vote is on the conspiracy.



posted on Jul, 2 2016 @ 12:05 PM
link   
The FBI will recommend an indictment next.
THEN the fancy footwork from the administration begins.



posted on Jul, 2 2016 @ 12:07 PM
link   
a reply to: Sillyolme

NO. I can't wait


I do hope you know I was being sarcastic. Maybe hopeful.


I am waiting for that moment, and it better include handcuffs!
And an orange jumper would be good too.



posted on Jul, 2 2016 @ 12:07 PM
link   

originally posted by: BlueAjah
a reply to: Sillyolme

NO. I can't wait


I do hope you know I was being sarcastic. Maybe hopeful.


I am waiting for that moment, and it better include handcuffs!
And an orange jumper would be good too.


What if handcuffs and orange jumpers are not forthcoming?



posted on Jul, 2 2016 @ 12:09 PM
link   

originally posted by: introvert

Now what if she is not indicted? Will those that have proclaimed her guilt be honest and admit they were wrong, or are we going to hear about the "conspiracy" for years to come?

My vote is on the conspiracy.


Putting the cart before the horse, don't you think?
The FBI just left her house, and you think its time to make a
decision with out the facts? Hmmmm......

Because Clinton campaign says its over so it must be over?



posted on Jul, 2 2016 @ 12:09 PM
link   
a reply to: introvert

Then the last shred of my trust in our justice system will be gone forever.
..



posted on Jul, 2 2016 @ 12:10 PM
link   
a reply to: burntheships

Thanksgiving is the biggest travel date of the year. Lol just sayin.
But you're right probably not a lot of viewers on a July Saturday in a holiday weekend.

πŸŽ†πŸŽ‡πŸŽ†πŸŽ†πŸŽŠπŸŽ‰πŸ”πŸ―πŸ‘πŸŽπŸŽŠπŸŽ‰πŸŽ‰πŸŽ‡πŸŽ†πŸŽˆπŸΊπŸΉπŸŽˆfireworks hamburgers drinks and balloons.
Happy 4th



posted on Jul, 2 2016 @ 12:11 PM
link   

originally posted by: burntheships

originally posted by: introvert

Now what if she is not indicted? Will those that have proclaimed her guilt be honest and admit they were wrong, or are we going to hear about the "conspiracy" for years to come?

My vote is on the conspiracy.


Putting the cart before the horse, don't you think?
The FBI just left her house, and you think its time to make a
decision with out the facts? Hmmmm......

Because Clinton campaign says its over so it must be over?





I've always said we have to wait and see what happens. It is my personal understanding from what we do know and other cases from the past, that certain conditions have to exist for the JD to prosecute. 80% of the time, they don't.

Now what will you say if she is not indicted?



posted on Jul, 2 2016 @ 12:11 PM
link   
a reply to: Sillyolme

Your right, I'm confused. I thought it was lets be moderator day.



posted on Jul, 2 2016 @ 12:12 PM
link   

originally posted by: BlueAjah
a reply to: introvert

Then the last shred of my trust in our justice system will be gone forever.
..


So you believe she is guilty no matter what?



new topics

top topics



 
65
<< 6  7  8    10  11  12 >>

log in

join