EXCLUSIVE: Hillary Clinton Scheduled To Meet With FBI On Saturday

a reply to: jadedANDcynical

(cont. from above)

April 23: State Dept. produces an additional 2,500 pages of ARB documents.

House Benghazi Committee writes Clinton’s personal attorney to reiterate its “request for her to turn over the server to a neutral, third party, such as an inspector general.”

April: White House produces 266 pages of documents including emails to and from National Security Staff. House Benghazi Committee sends White House another letter reiterating and refining its Dec. 2014 request for additional documents.

April 30: House Benghazi Committee announces the State Dept. has provided 4,000 more pages of documents, for the first time related to the ARB’s work.

Judicial Watch announces a lawsuit to release documents regarding Clinton’s use of iPhone or iPad for official business.

May 5-6, 2015: Judicial Watch files seven new FOI lawsuits related to Clinton’s use of private email server, seeking emails of her top aide Huma Abedin and records about Benghazi and the Clinton Foundation.

220px-Hillary_Clinton_official_Secretary_of_State_portrait_crop

May 8: House Benghazi Committee releases interim report:
It has received 20,000+ pages of new emails and documents from State Dept. for the first time including emails to or from Clinton.
It has held 24+ classified and unclassified briefings with the Administration and Executive Branch agencies.

May 22: State Dept. releases 296 Benghazi-related emails from Clinton’s private email account.

Week of June 16: House Benghazi Committee deposes Clinton confidant Sidney Blumenthal behind closed doors in a deposition nearly nine hours long.

June 22: House Benghazi Committee releases 60 emails sent to Clinton by Blumenthal, including some regarding Libya.

June 25: State Dept. provides House Benghazi Committee with some subpoenaed Benghazi-related emails that that Clinton had not turned over previously.

July 7: House Benghazi Committee releases news of Clinton subpoena (from last March) for the first time.

July 23: The New York Times reports that two Inspectors General have asked the Department of Justice to investigate whether Clinton mishandled sensitive government information.

July 28: Clinton revises her statement regarding classified email to say she is confident she never sent or received emails that were classified at the time.

July 31: The federal judge in a Judicial Watch FOI suit, Emmet Sullivan, orders State Dept. to request that Clinton and top aides Cheryl Mills and Human Abedin confirm, under penalty of perjury, that they have produced all government records in their possession, return any other government records immediately, and describe their use of Hillary Clinton’s email server to conduct government business.

Aug. 5: State Dept. sends letter to Clinton including Judge Sullivan’s order.

Aug. 6: Cheryl Mills’ attorney tells Judicial Watch it has instructed Mills to “delete any and all electronic copies [of potential federal records] in her possession” after her anticipated production of records on Aug. 10. Judicial Watch files an emergency request to block the destruction.

Aug. 11: Inspector General report to the Senate contradicts Clinton claims; some Clinton emails, says the IG, contained information that was classified at the time.

FBI takes custody of Clinton server and thumb drives.

Aug. 12: Clinton campaign strikes back as her poll numbers falter, including using the Media Matters blog to print her talking points attacking news reports on NBC and Fox. The blog uses other left-wing Astroturf outlets such as “Vox” as supposed support for its claims.

Aug. 15: In a campaign appearance at the Iowa State Fair, Clinton revises her statement about classified email a second time, stating that she never sent or received any that were “marked” classified.

3kgV0RJE

Aug. 19: Clinton’s personal lawyer tells a Senate committee that all data, including emails, was erased from her server prior to it being turned over to the FBI.

Clinton tells reporters the investigation surrounding her server “has nothing to do with me.” She contradicts the Inspector General by reiterating that she never sent or received classified material.

Aug. 20: State Dept. tells Judge Sullivan Clinton did not use State Dept. issued or secure Blackberry device; Blackberries used by Clinton aides Cheryl Mills and Human Abedin were likely destroyed.

Aug. 27: Appearing to read from notes, Clinton told an Iowa audience that using a personal email server “…clearly wasn’t the best choice..I take responsibility…” She repeated her modified statement, “I never sent nor received any e-mail that was marked classified. [emphasis added]”

Aug. 31: State Dept. publicly releases 7,000 pages of Clinton emails. Among other revelations, they show that Freedom of Information (FOI) law was violated since responsive emails had not been provided earlier under various FOI requests. Documents can be found by visiting the State Dept. FOI page and searching “Hillary Clinton.”

Sept. 3: Former Clinton Chief of Staff Cheryl Mills testifies to House Benghazi Committee behind closed doors.

Former Clinton campaign staffer and State Dept. official Bryan Pagliano, who helped set up Clinton’s personal server, tells Congress he will plead the Fifth Amendment and refuse the Congressional subpoena to testify.

Sept. 4: Former top Clinton aide Jake Sullivan testifies to House Benghazi Committee behind closed doors.

Sept. 8: A day after saying she had nothing to apologize for, Clinton says she’s “sorry” in an interview with ABC News.

Sept. 10: Pagliano takes the Fifth in a private meeting before the House Benghazi Committee.

Sept. 25: AP reports Obama administration has found work emails between Clinton and Gen. David Petraeus that she did not turn over. The dates call into question Clinton’s claim that she turned over all work related emails from her home system.

The State Dept. says it’s sending the House Benghazi Committee 925 more Clinton Benghazi and/or Libya-related emails that were not previously turned over.

October: Previously withheld Clinton emails reveal Clinton told daughter Chelsea almost immediately that terrorists were behind the Benghazi attacks, yet told the public they were prompted by a protest over a YouTube video.

Oct. 22: Clinton testifies before House Benghazi Committee for approximately 11 hours.

Nov. 30: State Dept. releases 8,000 more Clinton emails; some of the emails received “classified” markings.
2016

Jan. 15: The Inspector General for the intelligence community Charles McCullough tells members of Congress that several dozen additional classified emails have been identified in Clinton’s stash, including some with a higher classification than top secret, regarding highly sensitive programs.

April: The State Dept. provides a partial response to the Benghazi FOI request I filed in 2012 (that was due within about 30 days). It primarily consists of condolence letters sent to the U.S. from other countries.

May: FBI interviews Clinton aide Cheryl Mills around this time, according to reports. Mills reportedly leaves interview abruptly when certain questions are asked, but then returns and finishes the interview.

(cont. below)

a reply to: jadedANDcynical

(cpnt. from above)

May 25: A report from the Inspector General for the State Department finds Clinton personally violated federal records law, that there were attempts to hack into her system, that some Clinton aides also used personal email accounts exclusively for government business and did not fully cooperate with the IG investigation and that Clinton failed to turn over all of the emails she was required to turn over to investigators.

Please, sillyolme, tell me which one of the items listed is opinion?

Hopefully the FBI investigation leads to a very long prison sentence.

A man can dream.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: BlueAjah

Ahhh no. They dragged it out to cost her the election.
Now theyre looking joking at trump and saying oh no so they're wrapping it up. Its always been no criminal wrong doing all along.

I'm sure she didn't lie to the FBI.

Are you serious? Friends of my family worked closely with the Clintons in Arkansas, they lie hourly and they enjoy it and they abuse their staff, and they sleep with their friends' spouses, and they work with technicalities to win cases and they beat each other up and they expect law enforcement to cover it up as "private" or your career won't go well. And they've ruined a lot of careers. And they will call it "George". That's their MO. They're the anti-thesis of all that's good. So once again, are you serious? How much are you being paid for this fairytale you're promoting?

STM

ETA: The list is actually much longer, just shortened it for readability.

originally posted by: xuenchen
Remember folks, all the interview info so far is coming from known liars....

The Clinton Campaign.
...

Yep, and I'm sure they are pushing their Correct the Record people out in full force today.

Yep, seeing it already.

a reply to: jadedANDcynical

Walls of text?
Oh no.
What the frock does a timeline show.
She didn't commit a crime. She broke rules. We all do. It goes back to intent and consequences and there was no criminal intent and clearly there haven't been any consequences to her using the system. I fully expect that they say no criminal wrongdoing or what ever they declare in those instances..

a reply to: Sillyolme

I want you to point out where the opinion is since you so confidently and without any reservations stated, "Blogs are opinions only." You won't find anything that is not fact-based within the referenced post. And so you are wrong

You are wrong in describing my post as a wall of text also:

A piece of writing that does not use proper grammar and generally looks like a giant essay with 20 to 400 sentences without using paragraphs or any bit of spacing at all.

Urban Dictionary

Talk about total fail.

a reply to: jadedANDcynical

Blogs are written from the thoughts of the writer. Their thoughts about these matters are their opinion.

So the FBI only spoke to her for three and a half hours. That's not the grueling interrogation some said would happen.
What can we make of that?

a reply to: Sillyolme

Ok, so show me where any of the information in the referenced posts is an opinion.

Any at all.

There are no thoughts on the matters presented, just a simple timeline of factual happenings.

I'll be waiting.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: jadedANDcynical

Blogs are written from the thoughts of the writer. Their thoughts about these matters are their opinion.

Especially juicy is when they use government reports to prove a lie and a point.

a reply to: xuenchen

When you start throwong around adverbs like presumably, well it kinda takes the punch out of it.
Simmer down now....it will only be a few weeks at best.

a reply to: jadedANDcynical

Ok it's a diary. That better?

a reply to: seentoomuch

Oh neighborhood gossip. Goody goody.

Get real...

originally posted by: Sillyolme
So the FBI only spoke to her for three and a half hours. That's not the grueling interrogation some said would happen.
What can we make of that?

As pointed out, she could have taken the 5th. She could have
refused to answer any questions.

She refused an interview with the IG of The State Dept and lied
about that telling Americans she would gladly cooperate.

I

a reply to: BlueAjah

I speak for myself.
You on the other hand mimic the hive.
Clinton bad Clinton bad oooh oooh Clinton bad..

originally posted by: Sillyolme
So the FBI only spoke to her for three and a half hours. That's not the grueling interrogation some said would happen.
What can we make of that?

I'm surprised yor're even acknowledging she spoke to the FBI today. Last night you were bellyaching about the source first reporting it would happen today because it wasn't 'mainstream' enough for you.

originally posted by: introvert
Cool. It's about time.

The FBI needs to wrap this up so we can go on with out lives and address bigger issues.

What could be a bigger issue than a crooked crony hag like Hillary running for the top job in America? It is the biggest issue with implications far reaching to have someone as corrupt as Hillary Clinton running for president, but be as corrupt and criminally inspired as she has been proven to be.
The risk to America's future and even other countries, with a POS and power seeking cu''t like her running is a very LARGE issue.
The only thing that needs to be wrapped up is Hillary Clinton, and Bill together in hangman's noose's and dropped from a poorly constructed wooden platform by a grand jury of their peers. (After their criminal convictions of course).

a reply to: introvert


And exactly what past cases of a Secretary of State having over 2200 classified emails on an unclassified server in her house are you using as a past guideline??

Oh you aren't... you are just making crap up as you go along.


Just let the FBI do their job, recommend the indictments, and then you can come to the indictment day party yourself!

a reply to: Sillyolme

You ever talked to the FBI while you were under a criminal investigation? 3.5 hours can seem like an eternity.