Putins planes Keep Bombing despite agreement....

a reply to: neo96


Ummm...months for them...YEARS for NATO and the US...

So who's more ineffective...now...?

a reply to: Patriotsrevenge

...Turkey has troops in Saudi Arabia for this so called exercise since they are the best trained out of the bunch and likely are leading this stunt. So we can have 350 thousand Arabs invading from the south while Turkey pushes in from the north. Syria is fubar unless Russia backs them with nuclear weapons. Russia has sent out the warnings and the Arabs are acting as they do not care...

I don't have the link in front of me, but a sober article spell out how the Russians faced with an overwhelming force will employ the First Use of tactical Nukes... in 18 days (the length of the 'exercise') ending on 28 Feb 2016


the USA & NATO along with a coalition of Turks/Arabs and other desert dwellers/gulf-states are pushing hard to corner Russia into a face-on war
the fact is that Iran is to become the hegemon of the region not Turkey or Saudi Arabia
plus the USA/NATO are both plunging into economic collapse caused by the USA/EU treachery in a broad spectrum of the moving parts of maintaining a culture & civilization



I used the (WW3 in 18 days) for search & got this pertinent article: www.superstation95.com...
"

Russia has publicly warned Saudi Arabia, the US, and other countries, they risk "a new world war" if they act on plans to send troops into Syria. WW3: 18 days away."

Putins planes Keep Bombing despite agreement....

Despite what agreement, made by who?

The cessation of hostilities agreement falls short of a formal ceasefire, since it was not signed by the main warring parties - the opposition and government forces.

a reply to: DutchMasterChief

Russia, Assad and the other players involved. Doing research instead of being lazy is your friend.

A new peace deal for Syria effectively gives Russia and Assad 'a license to kill'

The announcement of a timeline for "cessations of hostilities" in Syria on Thursday might actually allow the Assad regime and its allies to continue the Syrian Civil War on their own brutal terms.

Syrian president Bashar al-Assad told AFP on Friday that he expects to reclaim control of the entire country even if it takes a "long time."

And he can continue waging war as the partial result of yesterday's diplomatic development.

On Thursday, the International Syria Support Group, a group of countries with interests in the outcome of the Syria conflict that includes the US, and Russia, issued a statement outlining an imminent halt in fighting.

The agreement is being hailed as a potential diplomatic breakthrough after four years of war in the country.

But the "Statement of the International Syria Support Group" issued on Thursday contains several loopholes that could work to the Assad regime's advantage and that allow him to continue some of the most destructive aspects of his campaign even with a "cessation of hostilities" in place.

Here are five reasons to be deeply skeptical of yesterday's development.

You have to click the link and then read the remainder of the article...

a reply to: Xcathdra

I don't have to do anything, I just provided the info that says that there is no agreement. Here it is again in case you somehow missed it when you responded to my post containing it.....

The cessation of hostilities agreement falls short of a formal ceasefire, since it was not signed by the main warring parties - the opposition and government forces.

a reply to: Patriotsrevenge

A very important point is that ISIS/ISIL/Daesh is simply a new name for the Muslim Brotherhood and especially its branch in Turkey supported by the nefarious "sultan" Erdogan.

The Turks have started bombing non-PKK Kurds who are fighting ISIS. Since the Russians know this -- and most of the world outside the USA knows this -- Russians will keep bombing the terrorists and may well engage in decisive action against the Turks. Very few people seem to think that NATO will go to war for Erdogan's sake -- though certainly the war of words would be fierce.

originally posted by: Kapriti
a reply to: Patriotsrevenge

A very important point is that ISIS/ISIL/Daesh is simply a new name for the Muslim Brotherhood and especially its branch in Turkey supported by the nefarious "sultan" Erdogan.

The Turks have started bombing non-PKK Kurds who are fighting ISIS. Since the Russians know this -- and most of the world outside the USA knows this -- Russians will keep bombing the terrorists and may well engage in decisive action against the Turks. Very few people seem to think that NATO will go to war for Erdogan's sake -- though certainly the war of words would be fierce.

Erdogan is the best friend the Kurds had in many years .

To Turks , DAESH/ISIS/PKK/YPG makes no difference , they are all terrorists .

According to your logic , when 2 terrorist groups are fighting we should support the one we like more .



Flawed logic due to ignorance .

a reply to: DutchMasterChief

and I provided you with evidence that there is.

a reply to: 23432

LOL, the Kurds are always attacked by Turkish forces. What sandy beach has your head been stuck in?

a reply to: Xcathdra

and I provided you with evidence that there is.

What part of this,

it was not signed by the main warring parties - the opposition and government forces.

don´t you understand?

And from your own source,

The timeline. The cessation of hostilities begins in one week, followed by an undefined period of negotiation over a more formal halt in the conflict.

The "agreement" isn't even supposed to be in effect yet, so the title of this thread is BS no matter how you look at it.

originally posted by: neo96
a reply to: Agit8dChop

Ridculing Russia is rather easy.

After all their involvement to 'end' ISIS was a 'slam' dunk.

I lost track of how many months it has been now.

Got news for you SAA and Russia are already very near so called ISIS cities near al raqqa

a reply to: bandersnatch

Although billed as a potential breakthrough, the "cessation of hostilities" agreement does not take effect for a week, at a time when Assad's government is poised to win its biggest victory of the war with the backing of Russian air power."

So if you are aware of this, why did you copy the clearly false and misleading title of the article?

Should the west just leave Assad and Putin to it. Can we walk away and let that happen? Do we really have to be involved in this and being part of the reconstruction of Syria. Building peace after this is over isn't going to be easy? What comes after Assad, who fills the void? Will they be worse than Assad?

originally posted by: woodwardjnr
Should the west just leave Assad and Putin to it. Can we walk away and let that happen? Do we really have to be involved in this and being part of the reconstruction of Syria. Building peace after this is over isn't going to be easy? What comes after Assad, who fills the void? Will they be worse than Assad?

We already created a failed state in Libya, why should try and repeat the same in Syria?

originally posted by: Patriotsrevenge
a reply to: 23432

LOL, the Kurds are always attacked by Turkish forces. What sandy beach has your head been stuck in?

Have ever met a Kurd in person , ever ?



This situation between Kurd & Turk is far too complicated for you to grasp with your current knowledge base .

Those " Turkish Forces " have % 25 Kurds amongst their ranks .

Kurdish terrorists organisations have been killing Kurds by and large in last 30 years .

YPG / PYD / PKK / DAESH / ISIS are all terrorists and will be dealt accordingly by Turks .

I must say , your posts about muslims are amusing ; brimming with ignorance .

a reply to: Xcathdra

20k tanks seems like a lot.

Guess the separatists will be out of new toys this year in Ukraine.

a reply to: tsurfer2000h

But the subject was 20k tanks sent into northern Saudi Arabia by Sunni states, so besides the Russia/Ukraine conflict not being the subject, your remark doesn't even make sense in any way.

Again, very typical of you, trying to change the subject into some sort of anti Russian sentiment.

Truly pathetic and inept.

a reply to: Patriotsrevenge

LOL, the Kurds are always attacked by Turkish forces.

So the Kurds never attacked Turkey...ever?

Here I find this interesting...

In July 2015, a suicide bombing blamed on IS killed 32 people in the mainly Kurdish town of Suruc, just inside Turkey's border from the war-torn Syrian town of Kobane.

Kurdish groups blamed the Turkish government for not doing enough to thwart IS operations and days after the bombing the PKK claimed responsibility for killing two policemen in the Kurdish majority city of Sanliurfa.

www.bbc.com...

So it's okay that they conduct terrorist attacks in Turkey, but when Turkey fights back it's wrong...imagine that.

ENOUGH!

Post ONLY about the OP topic.

Do NOT make posts about each other. Posts about other members, or comments about other members are considered off topic and will be removed.

Continue to do so, and you will be post banned.

Do not reply to this post.