It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: 0bserver1
Well I don't believe that we are the last of the Mohicans, I rather find it more as unable that extraterrestrials are either below the transmitting age . And those who are far ahead of radio transmitting technology, something we can't even decipher if we could hear it..
So that makes us in between galactic evolution.
By the time we found another way to communicate over long distance, we can hear the first incoming radio signals and we will probably the ones who are invisible to them
originally posted by: HarteA signal from a star 20,000 LY away would have been sent 20,000 years ago. There's a large enough population of stars that we could possibly get a signal if it happened within the last 700,000 years or so because we have a large sample of stars within that range of light years.
Of course, someone has to be there and they have to send a high gain signal (not television or radio) on a directed broadcast that was either purposefully or accidentally aimed our way.
So even in the best possible case, it's unlikely still that we will ever receive anything we can verify as a legitimate signal.
Harte
originally posted by: tanka418
originally posted by: HarteA signal from a star 20,000 LY away would have been sent 20,000 years ago. There's a large enough population of stars that we could possibly get a signal if it happened within the last 700,000 years or so because we have a large sample of stars within that range of light years.
Of course, someone has to be there and they have to send a high gain signal (not television or radio) on a directed broadcast that was either purposefully or accidentally aimed our way.
So even in the best possible case, it's unlikely still that we will ever receive anything we can verify as a legitimate signal.
Harte
IF a signal was "sent" even within a few short light years, it would be very unlikely that it could/would be interpreted as "intelligent. This is mostly due to the way Radio Astronomy works.
You try to speak of a "signal" that is not radio or TV, yet the only "signals" we are capable of receiving at that great distances are electromagnetic in nature, or in a more common terminology; radio.
The problem with electromagnetic radiation is the way it propagates, and the "signal", or strength thereof decreasing at as an inverse square. Such a signal sent from Earth, using the best and most powerful of Masers extant today, would not reach Alpha Centauri intact. While the signal would reach those 4 light years, it would be far too weak to receive in a normal manner, even with the very best of high gain antenna.
The solution to receiving these weak signals, and what is commonly done by Radio Astronomers, is a sort of summation over short periods of time. This has the effect of amplifying the signal to a level that can be detected by today's electronics. Unfortunately, this process destroys any intelligence (data) impressed onto the original signal Thus, signals from deep space can never be recognized as artificial, and possessing data of any form.
As a result of this "space" seems quiet, even if it is not.
The first evidence of alien life may be recorded as a hologram.
Scientists have detected microbes in Greenland sea ice using a specially built digital holographic microscope, suggesting that the instrument could have similar success on icy moons in the outer solar system, if any of them harbor life.
Indeed, the holographic microscope could theoretically make a contribution to NASA's mission to the Jupiter moon Europa, which the agency plans to launch by the mid-2020s, the instrument's developers say.
originally posted by: Harte
Actually, it could be received, if there was enough gain.
By "radio," I mean radio station broadcasts. The portion of the EM spectrum we call radio is fairly low power, but the gain can be vastly increased by using a directional transmitter. Also, frequencies used for radar extent up to thousands of times the strength of the kind of "radio" I was talking about.
And radar is used to map extraterrestrial bodies.
If a culture in the Alpha Centauri system was mapping a moon with radar, and the moon happened to be between us and them, then we would be able to receive that signal.
High powered radar doesn't include any info though, so we'd be hard pressed to establish it was an artificial signal.
If that same culture was stupid enough to be sending out such signals to advertise their presence, on the other hand, they would include information so that receivers would know it was an artificial signal.
This is why I implied (or tried to) that any signal would have to be purely accidentally (radar) or purposefully aimed at us (radar with information) or we could never receive it.
Harte
originally posted by: tanka418
originally posted by: Harte
Actually, it could be received, if there was enough gain.
Do you know how "gain" works? Do you know where this "gain" comes from?
By "radio," I mean radio station broadcasts. The portion of the EM spectrum we call radio is fairly low power, but the gain can be vastly increased by using a directional transmitter. Also, frequencies used for radar extent up to thousands of times the strength of the kind of "radio" I was talking about.
Yes, I know...I've worked with such equipment n my lifetime. But even at 10's of megawatts, the signal strength falls off very rapidly...as I said "inverse square". So even with a high gain antenna, or even using a maser (an RF equivalent to a laser) the signal would be lost in noise after traveling light years. At this point it would only be the impressed data that distinguishes the signal from any other naturally produced emission.
vhb: the creators had to produce billions of various life forms; including the most advanced: the mammal.
intrptr: If the Universe is Infinite and Eternal, then the 'creators' have had an infinite amount of time to develop life, lonnng before they ever put it here.
intrptr: Your proposing that this earth is the first such 'petri dish', pretty arrogant. How could you possibly know that, having never left here or been anywhere else?
originally posted by: Harte
Some of the microwaves we receive from space start out around 20 Gw. That's not Jiggawatts.
Harte
originally posted by: Harte
Some of the microwaves we receive from space start out around 20 Gw. That's not Jiggawatts.
Harte
originally posted by: game over man
We don't have a telescope that can detect what gases make up the atmosphere of an exoplanet or even get color pictures of an exoplanet. The moment life started producing photosynthesis it could be detected in our atmosphere, which is a pretty big time frame to be detected by aliens.
originally posted by: game over man
We don't have a telescope that can detect what gases make up the atmosphere of an exoplanet or even get color pictures of an exoplanet. The moment life started producing photosynthesis it could be detected in our atmosphere, which is a pretty big time frame to be detected by aliens.
originally posted by: Soylent Green Is People
originally posted by: game over man
We don't have a telescope that can detect what gases make up the atmosphere of an exoplanet or even get color pictures of an exoplanet. The moment life started producing photosynthesis it could be detected in our atmosphere, which is a pretty big time frame to be detected by aliens.
I think life itself (simple life) may be common. Therefore, an alien finding signs of "just life" in our atmosphere may not be that meaningful to aliens who have the ability to easily analyze the spectra of at atmospheres. They may find it all the time, and not find that anything worth necessarily following up on (if they had the ability to follow up). If plant life is common, then they may not find an atmosphere that indicates plant life to be something exciting. It may be a "ho-hum" finding that happens all the time.
The thing they may need to detect if they want to know if intelligent life is on a planet is industrial gasses in the atmosphere. In the case of Earth, the light from those industrial gasses has only reached the stars that are maybe only a few hundred light years away from us.
Maybe they can detect the fires made by hunter-gathers or the fires in the first settlements at the beginnings of our civilization, in which case that light from our atmosphere that may show the fires of our ancestors could be much farther out -- maybe 50,000 light years.
But the light from our atmosphere that shows signs of a technological civilization has only gone a few hundred light years out from us to only a fraction of the galaxy. It's not like the entire galaxy can detect that light.
But the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), which has been proposed as a successor to the Hubble Space Telescope for launch in 2018 and will study the universe in infrared wavelengths, could give us a first glimpse into the atmospheres of Earth-like exoplanets.
Mutation allowed the human brain to change overtime...imagine brains of animals on alien planets mutated in a more advanced way?