It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: AquarianTrumpet
Now I have been given a warning from the staff for my presentations to this thread; they did not explain what the infraction was for..? just that it expires in 72 hours.
:
originally posted by: Marduk
originally posted by: AquarianTrumpet
Now I have been given a warning from the staff for my presentations to this thread; they did not explain what the infraction was for..? just that it expires in 72 hours.
:
The content of your posts is way off topic, this thread is strictly supposed to be about the evolution of the true pyramid from the Mastaba, which the OP more than proved factual.
Limitations and calibration:
When Libby was first determining radiocarbon dates, he found that before 1000 BC his dates were earlier than calendar dates. He had assumed that amounts of Carbon-14 in the atmosphere had remained constant through time. In fact, levels of Carbon-14 have varied in the atmosphere through time. One good example would be the elevated levels of Carbon-14 in our atmosphere since WWII as a result of atomic bombs testing. Therefore, radiocarbon dates need to be calibrated with other dating techniques to ensure accuracy.
Radiocarbon Dating Results
Radiocarbon Scientists—Archaeologists Liaison
originally posted by: AdmireTheDistance
a reply to: AquarianTrumpet
You do realize that the Nazca lines are several thousand years newer than the great pyramid, right? That fact alone disproves your entire silly 'theory'...
If you really want others to see just how wrong you are, though, make your own thread and quit trying to hijack this one.
scripture recanted that tale much earlier
originally posted by: AquarianTrumpet
So from my standpoint - no RCD is not a reliable science - especially if Archaeoligists are in control of dating.
originally posted by: AdmireTheDistance
originally posted by: AquarianTrumpet
So from my standpoint - no RCD is not a reliable science - especially if Archaeoligists are in control of dating.
Your standpoint is remarkably ignorant then. Radiocarbon dating methods have been shown countless times to be quite reliable (to a point, and with a certain margin of error), and no archaeologists are 'in control of dating'. The fact that you would make such a statement only serves to further show that you are ignorant, and have no desire to educate yourself, if the facts don't match whatever silly preconceived ideas you have.
originally posted by: AquarianTrumpet
It seems finally all the usual suspects have arisen to the chess game - I am indeed honored
I've been here many a year and watched you's form your special club.
However - I will take up Marduk's offer of starting my own thread regarding the Giza Solar System showing what I have written here and continuing with the saga.
There will also be a second thread released regarding NazCAD..just for fun. I like to multi task.
I truly hope to see all of you there..and please remember -
I am hoping to conduct a civilized debate WITHOUT the name calling and snide remarks.
Until then everyone - be well.
originally posted by: AquarianTrumpet
When Libby was first determining radiocarbon dates, he found that before 1000 BC his dates were earlier than calendar dates. He had assumed that amounts of Carbon-14 in the atmosphere had remained constant through time. In fact, levels of Carbon-14 have varied in the atmosphere through time. One good example would be the elevated levels of Carbon-14 in our atmosphere since WWII as a result of atomic bombs testing. Therefore, radiocarbon dates need to be calibrated with other dating techniques to ensure accuracy.
So it appears that Atomic weapons created a big flub for RCD..so when was RCD introduced and refined and WHEN was Nuclear testing done? Apparently history agrees right around the same time.
This kind of makes it look like the Archaeologists are in control of dating and not the RCD science professionals.
I also read that flooding creates havoc for RCD..and it has been said that Giza has been flooded..
So from my standpoint - no RCD is not a reliable science - especially if Archaeologists are in control of dating.
originally posted by: AdmireTheDistance
a reply to: AquarianTrumpet
You do realize that the Nazca lines are several thousand years newer than the great pyramid, right?
originally posted by: bottleslingguy
did any of those guys you mentioned compare the cut marks on the stonework in Egypt with contemporary experiments using bamboo technology? If not they can't claim anything. they ignore the elephant in the room just like some people around here.
a reply to: Marduk
Once upon a time, there was no snake, there was no scorpion,
There was no hyena, there was no lion,
There was no wild dog, no wolf,
There was no fear, no terror,
Man had no rival.
In those days, the land Shuber-Hamazi,
Harmony-tongued Sumer, the great land of the me of princeship,
Uri, the land having all that is appropriate,
The land Martu, resting in security,
The whole universe, the people well cared for,
To Enlil in one tongue gave speech.
Then the lord defiant, the prince defiant, the king defiant,
Enki, the lord of abundance, whose commands are trustworthy,
The lord of wisdom, who scans the land,
The leader of the gods,
The lord of Eridu, endowed with wisdom,
Changed the speech in their mouths, put contention into it,
Into the speech of man that had been one.
Gilgamesh: -
When a seventh day arrived
I sent forth a dove and released it.
The dove went off, but came back to me;
no perch was visible so it circled back to me.
Genesis 7
8 And he sent forth a dove from him, to see if the waters were abated from off the face of the ground. 9 But the dove found no rest for the sole of her foot, and she returned unto him to the ark, for the waters were on the face of the whole earth
Gilgamesh
I sent forth a raven and released it.
The raven went off, and saw the waters slither back.
It eats, it scratches, it bobs, but does not circle back to me.
Genesis 7
7 And he sent forth a raven, and it went forth to and fro, until the waters were dried up from off the earth
The Babylonian captivity or Babylonian exile is the period in Jewish history during which a number of Judahites of the ancient Kingdom of Judah were captives in Babylonia. After the Battle of Carchemish in 605 BCE, Nebuchadnezzar, the king of Babylon, besieged Jerusalem, resulting in tribute being paid by King Jehoiakim. Jehoiakim refused to pay tribute in Nebuchadnezzar's fourth year, which led to another siege in Nebuchadnezzar's seventh year, culminating with the death of Jehoiakim and the exile of King Jeconiah, his court and many others; Jeconiah's successor Zedekiah and others were exiled in Nebuchadnezzar's eighteenth year; a later deportation occurred in Nebuchadnezzar's twenty-third year.
Archaeological studies have revealed that not all of the population of Judah was deported, and that, although Jerusalem was utterly destroyed, other parts of Judah continued to be inhabited during the period of the exile. The return of the exiles was a gradual process rather than a single event, and many of the deportees or their descendants did not return.
unless you forensically compare the cut marks and consistency of symmetry and tolerances you are blowing out a lot of hot air.
originally posted by: bottleslingguy
I am not making any claim other than pointing out what you are using as evidence has never been compared to the stonework in Giza or anywhere else for that matter