It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: NateTheAnimator
This is a serious question that has kind of puzzled me for years, even as a former christian I never understood it. Why blame Lucifer/Satan for the woes of this world? What did he do to mankind to deserve the kind of hate he gets? Why in the scriptures do we never see Lucifer's downfall from his perspective or at least the writers taking a more objective stance? (I know many Christians may not view Satan as an entity but more the temptation of an individual to commit morally reprehensible acts.)
If I were to examine the mythology objectively towards both characters,God's done some pretty #ed up #;
-Created Adam and Eve essentially as ignorant slave worshipers to take care of the animals he just made because he's too lazy to look after them
-Flooded the earth and saves a drunk
- Killed kids using a bear because they made fun of some bald guy
- Destroyed entire cities for petty reasons
- Makes a Pharaoh angry intentionally so he can kill more kids
- sends his followers on crusades to conquer neighboring tribes over a covenant they made with him
- allows his followers to practice polygamy but absolutely abhors same sex relations
- permits slavery but hates it when you shave and the list goes on.
Satan on the other hand;
- Rebelled against God
- Gave humanity the ability to know right from wrong
-ordered(by God!) to kill a total of ten people
-tempted his Jewish son Jesus to test his faith.
-His blamed for all the sins committed
Clearly there's some disparity here, am I wrong?
Then suddenly Humanity's supposed to just bow down to God because he sends down his Jewish zombie son, he then gets his son to "die" for us because many of us realized how ridiculous religion is. To top it all off, if we choose not to recognize his seemingly absent authority were punished for it. How loving and merciful of a father to do that to his own kids. Also what's up with the Holy ghost not getting much love?
I'm not here to debate the existent of either of the entities mentioned nor am I hear to corrupt you from your faith. Somebody seriously explain to me why God is the good-guy in this dichotomy? I'm sure this question's been asked in previous threads, if so ignore this.
originally posted by: NateTheAnimator
a reply to: vincentdaniel7
BUT I'VE LITERALLY TESTED GOD OVER AND OVER AND OVER. ON HIS CLAIM OF BEING A MERCIFUL GOD.
So Could you elaborate more about how you went about testing God's claim of being a loving,merciful father figure?
I had to pray more than once to get that proof I had to pray a lot, over and over again and then,, then once it happen, I NOW pray to him to give THANKS OVER and OVER AGAIN. Now,, Not to request proof anymore, He's giving me plenty of that.
Again could you specifically cite your anecdotal... I mean if you're really just going to make an argument appealing to emotions and the irrational concept of answered prayer at the very least give details. This is too vague even for a christian to fully grasp. But if that's simply it, That God just magically "proved" to you and only you that he truly is the character depicted in scripture, you might want to ask God why his replies are incredibly vague for a deity who claims to have created the universe. Also if this proof doesn't meet the criteria of scientific evidence than its completely worthless.
I myself may not have scientific evidence to prove God is a fraud. What is Imprudent with that in mind is to just continue to worship this character when you haven't even heard the other side of story, all you've been told about Satan, Lucifer is entirely one sided. To ignore another individual's perspective simply because you've been told to, is nothing more than blind faith and false hope that you treasure as an honorable long-term investment for a reward so inconsequential to the life you currently live is proof to me that your stupid enough to swallow anything at face-value.
Why not study both sides?
Come back to me once you have.
originally posted by: WakeUpBeer
a reply to: vincentdaniel7
So you will ignore Biblical inaccuracies with reality because Jesus. Check.
originally posted by: WakeUpBeer
a reply to: vincentdaniel7
So you will ignore Biblical inaccuracies with reality because Jesus. Check.
originally posted by: NateTheAnimator
a reply to: vincentdaniel7
BUT I'VE LITERALLY TESTED GOD OVER AND OVER AND OVER. ON HIS CLAIM OF BEING A MERCIFUL GOD.
So Could you elaborate more about how you went about testing God's claim of being a loving,merciful father figure?
I had to pray more than once to get that proof I had to pray a lot, over and over again and then,, then once it happen, I NOW pray to him to give THANKS OVER and OVER AGAIN. Now,, Not to request proof anymore, He's giving me plenty of that.
Again could you specifically cite your anecdotal... I mean if you're really just going to make an argument appealing to emotions and the irrational concept of answered prayer at the very least give details. This is too vague even for a christian to fully grasp. But if that's simply it, That God just magically "proved" to you and only you that he truly is the character depicted in scripture, you might want to ask God why his replies are incredibly vague for a deity who claims to have created the universe. Also if this proof doesn't meet the criteria of scientific evidence than its completely worthless.
I myself may not have scientific evidence to prove God is a fraud. What is Imprudent with that in mind is to just continue to worship this character when you haven't even heard the other side of story, all you've been told about Satan, Lucifer is entirely one sided. To ignore another individual's perspective simply because you've been told to, is nothing more than blind faith and false hope that you treasure as an honorable long-term investment for a reward so inconsequential to the life you currently live is proof to me that your stupid enough to swallow anything at face-value.
Why not study both sides?
Come back to me once you have.
originally posted by: WakeUpBeer
a reply to: vincentdaniel7
You're fooling yourself.
originally posted by: Akragon
Its wonderful that you guys post your testamonies about how much you love the bible...
I love the book to, but that doesn't change what i've found within the book over the years... And i am not just a casual obvserver when it comes to bibical study
The only books that have any value in this age are the gospels...
That is the only constant when it comes to said book
Thanks for replying though
originally posted by: Silenthill666007
originally posted by: Akragon
a reply to: vincentdaniel7
Believe me there is a lot more proof in fact so much proof that what the Bible says is accurate that in the 1800's ARCHAEOLOGISTS no longer needed to go to COURT BECAUSE THE LAWYERS THAT WERE AGAINST THE BIBLE GAVE UP BECAUSE just a little while longer and the ARCHAEOLOGISTS would always come up with THE PROOF THAT THE BIBLE WAS TELLING THE TRUTH.
Well that was 200 years ago...
We have better data now obviously, and we know the bible is not accurate... in some cases yes it is... but it is far from infallible if that's what you're getting at...
For instance... the exodus... no evidence what so ever... not a shred...
Sodom... Nothing
Noah... Nothing
the flood... nothing
Adam and eve... nothing
Abraham... little to nothing but a small shack that "might" have been lived in around his time...
people were naïve in the 1800s, and religious people are still just as naïve today... well at least the fundamentalists are
and so on and so on...
My mom told me Jesus was teaching us lessons. She said some people take the Bible too literally as every word is written by God. I believe Jesus to be an extremely intelligent teacher, but I don't look to the Bible as a history lesson.
My own personal philosophies about Satan and the "serpent"..... It used to be a male dominated society back then women didn't have rights and even today men are responsible for 95% of violent crime. Angel spelled backwards is " legna" . Men have an extra leg that looks like a serpent. It's been translated through four languages , so that might be a coincidence. I seen artistic impression by one of my favorite artists who doesn't have faith but tells religious stories. In his stories all men go to hell and all women go to heaven. People are sexually imbalanced cause of their hormones and genetic makeup. But if you think of all the men and women you know, women are generally kinder and better people.
I also got a gay cousin. I read that if a man lies with another man he should be stoned to death. Back then men were built like Troy and it might have been considered very cruel for a man to have sex with another man or male child. It might have been a painful traumatic event and maybe not love like considered today. I need to study the history of the world but I try to consider a lot of things. Maybe try to see what he meant?
originally posted by: Silenthill666007
originally posted by: Akragon
a reply to: vincentdaniel7
Believe me there is a lot more proof in fact so much proof that what the Bible says is accurate that in the 1800's ARCHAEOLOGISTS no longer needed to go to COURT BECAUSE THE LAWYERS THAT WERE AGAINST THE BIBLE GAVE UP BECAUSE just a little while longer and the ARCHAEOLOGISTS would always come up with THE PROOF THAT THE BIBLE WAS TELLING THE TRUTH.
Well that was 200 years ago...
We have better data now obviously, and we know the bible is not accurate... in some cases yes it is... but it is far from infallible if that's what you're getting at...
For instance... the exodus... no evidence what so ever... not a shred...
Sodom... Nothing
Noah... Nothing
the flood... nothing
Adam and eve... nothing
Abraham... little to nothing but a small shack that "might" have been lived in around his time...
people were naïve in the 1800s, and religious people are still just as naïve today... well at least the fundamentalists are
and so on and so on...
My mom told me Jesus was teaching us lessons. She said some people take the Bible too literally as every word is written by God. I believe Jesus to be an extremely intelligent teacher, but I don't look to the Bible as a history lesson.
My own personal philosophies about Satan and the "serpent"..... It used to be a male dominated society back then women didn't have rights and even today men are responsible for 95% of violent crime. Angel spelled backwards is " legna" . Men have an extra leg that looks like a serpent. It's been translated through four languages , so that might be a coincidence. I seen artistic impression by one of my favorite artists who doesn't have faith but tells religious stories. In his stories all men go to hell and all women go to heaven. People are sexually imbalanced cause of their hormones and genetic makeup. But if you think of all the men and women you know, women are generally kinder and better people.
I also got a gay cousin. I read that if a man lies with another man he should be stoned to death. Back then men were built like Troy and it might have been considered very cruel for a man to have sex with another man or male child. It might have been a painful traumatic event and maybe not love like considered today. I need to study the history of the world but I try to consider a lot of things. Maybe try to see what he meant?
originally posted by: Silenthill666007
originally posted by: Akragon
a reply to: vincentdaniel7
Believe me there is a lot more proof in fact so much proof that what the Bible says is accurate that in the 1800's ARCHAEOLOGISTS no longer needed to go to COURT BECAUSE THE LAWYERS THAT WERE AGAINST THE BIBLE GAVE UP BECAUSE just a little while longer and the ARCHAEOLOGISTS would always come up with THE PROOF THAT THE BIBLE WAS TELLING THE TRUTH.
Well that was 200 years ago...
We have better data now obviously, and we know the bible is not accurate... in some cases yes it is... but it is far from infallible if that's what you're getting at...
For instance... the exodus... no evidence what so ever... not a shred...
Sodom... Nothing
Noah... Nothing
the flood... nothing
Adam and eve... nothing
Abraham... little to nothing but a small shack that "might" have been lived in around his time...
people were naïve in the 1800s, and religious people are still just as naïve today... well at least the fundamentalists are
and so on and so on...
My mom told me Jesus was teaching us lessons. She said some people take the Bible too literally as every word is written by God. I believe Jesus to be an extremely intelligent teacher, but I don't look to the Bible as a history lesson.
My own personal philosophies about Satan and the "serpent"..... It used to be a male dominated society back then women didn't have rights and even today men are responsible for 95% of violent crime. Angel spelled backwards is " legna" . Men have an extra leg that looks like a serpent. It's been translated through four languages , so that might be a coincidence. I seen artistic impression by one of my favorite artists who doesn't have faith but tells religious stories. In his stories all men go to hell and all women go to heaven. People are sexually imbalanced cause of their hormones and genetic makeup. But if you think of all the men and women you know, women are generally kinder and better people.
I also got a gay cousin. I read that if a man lies with another man he should be stoned to death. Back then men were built like Troy and it might have been considered very cruel for a man to have sex with another man or male child. It might have been a painful traumatic event and maybe not love like considered today. I need to study the history of the world but I try to consider a lot of things. Maybe try to see what he meant?
originally posted by: NateTheAnimator
a reply to: vincentdaniel7
I'm still not seeing what it is that convinced you? IF you were an Atheist for seven years how could the depiction of God in the Bible reconvert you? Explain, I'm genuinely interested as to hearing why you went back to being indoctrinated...
It sounds much like the beautiful garden that Jehovah God made for Adam and Eve, doesn’t it? But will the whole earth ever be a paradise?
originally posted by: NateTheAnimator
a reply to: vincentdaniel7
It sounds much like the beautiful garden that Jehovah God made for Adam and Eve, doesn’t it? But will the whole earth ever be a paradise?
Yes as Akragon stated earlier it sounds all nice and dandy according to the book and how you perceive it within your own imagination. Which is what any fictional book relies heavily on, is how far your imagination will make you believe.
Adam and Eve were preprogrammed/indoctrinated (the same way you have) to essentially believe that everything God said or did was for their benefit and was always truthful. They may not have had to work hard but their purpose was to watch over the living animals in the garden in return for being created and the gift of immortality. Which he can take away from them at any moment if he so chooses,(in the end he does just that)this is involuntary indentured servitude my friend AKA slavery. It seems in this relationship God is the one who benefits from this contract not his creations. The angels are also enslaved to God's command. Their not compensated in anyway and those that disobey him are also punished with out remorse.
Again explain to me why Satan is the 'bad' guy..
originally posted by: Akragon
a reply to: vincentdaniel7
look man, like I said before... its lovely that you have your faith in the book... Believe whatever you will
But the fact remains, the book has errors, contradictions and alterations... I realise you don't believe that, but that is the Christian mentality... you people believe your book is perfect...
Unfortunately that is just not reality... And regardless of what you post or whatever explanation you give, it doesn't change anything... I Don't believe the god of the OT is God at all...
You speak of knowing Gods personality... Yet you see no difference between the Father Jesus spoke of and the entity within the OT... which is nothing more then turning a blind eye to obvious issues
but again, feel free to do so... I would never expect a Christian to say anything that remotely resembles a bad word against your book...
Try to remember one thing though... God is NOT confined to your book
And by the way, please stop saying "its a complicated book, or im not reading it right"... Just because I don't agree with your personal assessment does not make me stupid
Thanks
originally posted by: Akragon
a reply to: vincentdaniel7
look man, like I said before... its lovely that you have your faith in the book... Believe whatever you will
But the fact remains, the book has errors, contradictions and alterations... I realise you don't believe that, but that is the Christian mentality... you people believe your book is perfect...
Unfortunately that is just not reality... And regardless of what you post or whatever explanation you give, it doesn't change anything... I Don't believe the god of the OT is God at all...
You speak of knowing Gods personality... Yet you see no difference between the Father Jesus spoke of and the entity within the OT... which is nothing more then turning a blind eye to obvious issues
but again, feel free to do so... I would never expect a Christian to say anything that remotely resembles a bad word against your book...
Try to remember one thing though... God is NOT confined to your book
And by the way, please stop saying "its a complicated book, or im not reading it right"... Just because I don't agree with your personal assessment does not make me stupid
Thanks