It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
FOR EXAMPLE; if he had not confuse the language we may have been driving cars a few years or a few decades before Christ came on earth, that's why I don't view it as murder I may not have the ability to figure out conditions environment a nations that teaches their children's one way of life, parents to teach their children to be evil, Or to have evil views, in order to protect myself from them.
originally posted by: Akragon
a reply to: vincentdaniel7
How can you say that when you have read that Jesus actually had a conversation with Satan I thought you were a strong advocate of the gospel.
Yes... this is true
What actually happened in that scenario was Jesus fighting his inner desires, not talking and having a conversation with an actual entity.
He went to the wilderness to conquer said issues... with the power he actually had being the son of God he could have made bread for himself... but did not use said power for his own needs though he could have...
HE could have jumped off that cliff fully knowning that the Fathers angels would have caught him, but did not want to tempt the Father because he had a mission to accomplish...
HE could have been king over the whole material world and all things given to him... all that was needed was to worship the material... but he said back the hell up satan... I only have one God, and worship only him...
its really not complicated, and lets no credibility to the actual existence of said horned red guy
originally posted by: NateTheAnimator
a reply to: vincentdaniel7
FOR EXAMPLE; if he had not confuse the language we may have been driving cars a few years or a few decades before Christ came on earth, that's why I don't view it as murder I may not have the ability to figure out conditions environment a nations that teaches their children's one way of life, parents to teach their children to be evil, Or to have evil views, in order to protect myself from them.
Again your own example only further proves That God from the OT wasn't not there to nurture us into reaching our full potential...
It is fairly easy to assert that the Satan we read about in the Bible is merely a symbol of all that is evil. But is that really what the Bible teaches? If so, why does the Bible describe Satan as speaking with Jesus Christ and with Almighty God himself? Consider two instances of such conversations.
originally posted by: Lucid Lunacy
a reply to: vincentdaniel7
So you used to be a Satanist or are you implying that being a non-believer of the Bible is siding with Satan?
originally posted by: Lucid Lunacy
The notion this alleged god isn't murderous is beyond silly. One could post verse after verse supporting that. Fill many pages of this thread on that alone.
For me the genocidal flood and the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah is plenty sufficient. You can spin that in Yahweh's favor, as I'm sure you will, but it won't fly. In both of those instances there would have been indiscriminate mass slaughter of infants, toddlers, young teens, pregnant mothers, adorable puppies...
No sane person with even a modicum of ethical thinking would deem that morally permissible.
he look into their heart and he saw violence 24/7 in their hearts he said day and night they think of violence?
originally posted by: Lucid Lunacy
The notion this alleged god isn't murderous is beyond silly. One could post verse after verse supporting that. Fill many pages of this thread on that alone.
For me the genocidal flood and the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah is plenty sufficient. You can spin that in Yahweh's favor, as I'm sure you will, but it won't fly. In both of those instances there would have been indiscriminate mass slaughter of infants, toddlers, young teens, pregnant mothers, adorable puppies...
No sane person with even a modicum of ethical thinking would deem that morally permissible.
originally posted by: Akragon
a reply to: Lucid Lunacy
Interesting question...
how powerful was he?
So powerful that he seemed to need a spacecraft to land on "the mountain of god"...
hmmm...
And as for Sodom and Gomorrah,
well if there is at least one good person will you save the city, and I think it went from
So God was forced to get rid of that threat.
originally posted by: Lucid Lunacy
a reply to: vincentdaniel7
So because there were 'evil' people in those two major cities, it was morally acceptable to rain brimstone fireballs down on babies and pregnant mothers?
Sorry friend but you're going to have one hell of a time convincing me of that.
Not too mention you said earlier in ALL CAPS how powerful he is. Surely he could have just snapped his proverbial fingers and *poof* the bad people specifically are removed from Earth.
he look into their heart and he saw violence 24/7 in their hearts he said day and night they think of violence?
Infants and toddlers had violence in their hearts and in their thoughts 24/7??......
originally posted by: Lucid Lunacy
a reply to: vincentdaniel7
And as for Sodom and Gomorrah,
well if there is at least one good person will you save the city, and I think it went from
Correct. Which is asinine. These were two major cities. Thriving with people. The notion that all the babies and young children and teens [there would have been lots] were wholly evil and deserving of a very gruesome death is beyond ridiculous.
So God was forced to get rid of that threat.
So this god can create an entire Universe but he can't carry out a death sentence on the bad people specifically?
originally posted by: Akragon
a reply to: vincentdaniel7
The imagery given in exodus 19 sure sounds like a spacecraft to me...
But perhaps its just me
originally posted by: Akragon
a reply to: vincentdaniel7
Yet said god could not protect Lots wife from being turned into a "pillar of salt"?
just because she looked back...
sounds a little petty don't you think?
originally posted by: Lucid Lunacy
a reply to: vincentdaniel7
And as for Sodom and Gomorrah,
well if there is at least one good person will you save the city, and I think it went from
Correct. Which is asinine. These were two major cities. Thriving with people. The notion that all the babies and young children and teens [there would have been lots] were wholly evil and deserving of a very gruesome death is beyond ridiculous.
So God was forced to get rid of that threat.
So this god can create an entire Universe but he can't carry out a death sentence on the bad people specifically?