It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: UnBreakable
It's times like this I thank God I'm an atheist.
originally posted by: IAMTAT
I have absolutely no problem with a public school exhibiting their student's art on school property (whether it's of any religious theme or not)...regardless of the time of year.
originally posted by: buster2010
originally posted by: Bluntone22
originally posted by: buster2010
originally posted by: Bluntone22
originally posted by: buster2010
originally posted by: Bluntone22
This play is an after school activity and is performed by volunteers. No student is required to participate or attend the event. Nothing is being forced on the students.
Irrelevant. Government taxes are still paying for it. The taxpayers are paying for lights, janitors and for the clean up and set up of the scenes.
And they would be paying the same amount if the play was about romeo and Juliette.
What religion is Romeo and Juliette about?
Does the subject matter of the play have anything to do with the cost of the play? The school and the public will be paying the same amount of money for the production.
Of course subject matter is important. Government taxes cannot be used to promote religion. By using a nativity scene they are promoting Christianity. It would help had you actually read the thread before commenting.
That's totally out of context. Not unexpected.
originally posted by: rockintitz
a reply to: buster2010
What is being forced on you?
So you have to walk past a barn with a baby and some old dudes?
I'm not Christian but this hypersensitivity to everything is getting old.
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
Of course, the community stands behind the school, the play etc. But I suppose the ACLU, who are not members of the community, has the community's, and not their own, best interests in mind.
originally posted by: Benevolent Heretic
originally posted by: grandmakdw
But yet, a Christian
and truly a large number of Christians
agree with abolishing Christmas
the way it stands now.
Why ban it, though??? Why not just let individuals enjoy and celebrate the winter solstice any way they want?
...be it Christian or Pagen
they all lead back to religion.
Things CHANGE. Christmas (TO SOME) has become a totally secular holiday. Why not just let it be? Celebrate it OR NOT how you want to.
I have known people who refrain from presents, decoration, etc, and actually celebrate the birth of Christ (does it really matter that they're doing it on the wrong DAY???) They are not celebrating the DAY, they're celebrating the birth of the man they consider to be their savior.
I don't understand the need to BAN something for everyone, just because you don't agree with it.
originally posted by: grandmakdw
Separation of religion and state,
so by law these symbols must also go
or the cities/state are putting up
religious symbols for religious groups.
The vast, vast, VAST majority of atheists are not waging any kind of war on Christmas, any religion, or any religious holidays or people. That's the point to consider here, internet.
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
a reply to: Annee
And which law would that be?
Legal precedent has been set in past cases of schools and Separation of Church and State.