It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: auroraaus
In reply to Hutch re that article, posting a snippet any anyone interested.
The Mirror - NK live updates
The Scud middles that South Korea believe the North is preparing to launch this morning will target 11 sites, according to intelligence sources in the South.
Locations where loudspeakers are situated on the Southern side of the border will be targeted after the North accused its rival of broadcasting 'anti-North Korea propaganda'.
South Korea has confirmed that it expects to be attacked, and insists that it will retaliate.
Text bolded by me.
That bit worries me.
originally posted by: HumanPLC
a reply to: felixjames20
I don't think he's deliberately fired at SK targets before though; isn't that essentially an act of war?
originally posted by: crazyewok
originally posted by: HumanPLC
a reply to: felixjames20
I don't think he's deliberately fired at SK targets before though; isn't that essentially an act of war?
They have.
NK shelled a Island killing civilians win 2010
Same year they also sunk a SK corvette
originally posted by: Rocker2013
originally posted by: felixjames20
its the same nonsense every year
How many times has the North fired at the South?
How many times has the North moved military assets?
How many times has the North made statements putting their military into preparedness?
How many times has anything been taken seriously by the South?
How long has the South had a policy of disproportionate retaliation?
We all know that NK is a ranting madman, but this is absolutely different to the usual ranting from NK.
A lot has changed and a lot is different this time. It's not just business as usual from the North and this should not be simply dismissed as yet more bluster. The two sides have not faced off like this for a damn long time.
originally posted by: TechniXcality
a reply to: crazyewok
You know this is a war that is extremely worrisome in terms of loss of life on both sides, and I don't want a war but as it should be apparent to all, the provocations will not stop and we are going to face this eventually. What a sad state of affairs.
originally posted by: TechniXcality
a reply to: Rocker2013
It's interesting, that this situation seems to not divide the majority on political beliefs and partisan standings. Everyone or the majority of everyone stand in solidarity that this must stop at once. Usually that spells war, let's hope for the best, prepare for the worst.
originally posted by: BobaFettish
originally posted by: Xcathdra
a reply to: smirkley
The problem is North Korean threats on nuclear weapons use. I truly believe little kimmy will use them on the south.
He has to get them off the ground without exploding them first..
2nd