It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: samkent
If someone proved one of your sticking points that has prevented you from accepting the OS would you change your mind about the entire conspiracy?
Example:
Lets say Joe Schmoe's son is going through his deceased fathers things and finds a camcorder.
So he charges and hits play.
The tape was shot in DC and out the hotel window is the Pentagon and it clearly shows the plane hitting.
originally posted by: CharlieSpeirs
Then take a good look at the Pentagon footage again and notice the fireball explode outwards with debris flying outwards and then try and lullaby us all to sleep with more BS, sorry OS...
Would evidence like physics stop your conspiracy in its tracks?
As to your question, no I wouldn't stop believing the conspiracy I believe because nothing you've said negates it.
You know what they did find in the rubble, a passport...
No camcorder though.
Just a passport, an asbestos passport that can sustain a fire that steel beams couldn't.
Please...
Buildings don't smash through themselves without an accelerant.
Not only that, but inexperienced "pilots" who couldn't handle small planes at low knots, could guide 3 jumbo boeing planes perfectly into 3 buildings at a high rate of knots...
So molten aluminium made the towers fall into themselves...
With so many cameras that could have gotten the shot, it's almost uncanny that not one DVR was able to produce a picture of the plane at any point.
originally posted by: skyeagle409
a reply to: AceWombat04
Also remember, the hijackers had no intention of landing the aircraft.
And if they had they probably would be able to pull off a survivable landing by the use of automatics, as all planes used 9/11 were CATIIIB capable.