It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: 5StarOracle
mutations are unnatural yet still accommodated by design and still confined to its limitations...
Just can't be possible for somebody who blinds themselves what's beyond me is the absolute inability to perceive truth because you hate the idea of a creator or God...
It's a blue print are you really so blind even defects hold true to the constructs because the finger is shorter than normal big deal the phalanges still follow the rule so you are just plain wrong and yes inept...
originally posted by: 5StarOracle
How is a mutation which is bound by the same design proof against its existence???
are you arguing for me or against me you may have convinced some knucklehead of your position but you are really giving examples to prove my argument...
Done with talking to the short bus guys...
originally posted by: 5StarOracle
a reply to: Barcs
How is a mutation which is bound by the same design proof against its existence???
its only further proof of the same...
wtf are you rambling on about evolution for? don't you know that that it is further proof...
are you arguing for me or against me you may have convinced some knucklehead of your position but you are really giving examples to prove my argument...
Done with talking to the short bus guys...
originally posted by: 5StarOracle
a reply to: Barcs
How is a mutation which is bound by the same design proof against its existence???
its only further proof of the same...
wtf are you rambling on about evolution for? don't you know that that it is further proof...
are you arguing for me or against me you may have convinced some knucklehead of your position but you are really giving examples to prove my argument...
Done with talking to the short bus guys...
originally posted by: 5StarOracle
a reply to: Barcs
Ok now you are being simple instead of doing some research and learning something you ask me for proof, instead I ask you to show me the faults in my examples...
You can't alter the examples I have given and that is the proof...
Either the universe had a creator or the universe had always existed. Which is more logical?
originally posted by: Blue_Jay33
a reply to: 5StarOracle
That is a very good video, math isn't bias and it has no agenda, yet these things make for a compelling case against all these debunker's.
You watch a video like that and they still say we have no argument.
Here is the bottom line, one group has cognitive dissonance, the other is closer to the true reality of this world.
And one day we will find out for sure just who is right, 100%. But for now the debate rages on, and it is far from over, billions believe in a creator of some kind.
To say it's over is intellectual elitism pumped up by egotism, delusional and a lie. For example it's not over for an agnostic, they are still on the fence so to speak, and they could go either way, or just hold into their present belief
originally posted by: Blue_Jay33
a reply to: 5StarOracle
That is a very good video, math isn't bias (sic) and it has no agenda