It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Zaphod58
a reply to: AdamuBureido
Considering that there's no outside access that would allow for it without modification, OK I will.
originally posted by: Answer
originally posted by: AdamuBureido
originally posted by: Ivar_Karlsen
aren't certain jets remote controllable [as an anti-hijacking system]?
No transport category airplanes are remote controllable.
keep believing that Fly-by-wire and remote hijack recovery does not exist or that it ain't hackable
Considering the fact that the resident ATS experts have stated numerous times that it isn't possible... I'll keep believing them over random conspiracy theorists.
originally posted by: blackhorse61
apparently cern shut down around the same time due to a short circuit
originally posted by: ceetee
originally posted by: grandmakdw
In reading about the co-pilot, suicide and mental illness
was NOT what came to mind.
It sounded more like the repeating of a mantra "must destroy the plane",
a sort of trigger, put in by hypnosis,
a deep and very professionally done, drug induced hypnosis,
one that the co-pilot himself would be unaware of
on a conscious level.
It did not sound at all like suicidal intention to me.
This would explain the deep regular breathing.
It also occurred after the pilot went over the upcoming
landing procedures with the co-pilot
which could have triggered
a deep hypnotic trigger event.
what?
do you just make stuff up as you go along?
originally posted by: saadad
a reply to: Bigburgh
OMG. If media now in next release say that copilot was epileptic?
You will believe that. Looks like some people in this topic are very easy to be mind controlled. And. No. You dont need a special device to mind control
originally posted by: grandmakdw
originally posted by: ceetee
originally posted by: grandmakdw
In reading about the co-pilot, suicide and mental illness
was NOT what came to mind.
It sounded more like the repeating of a mantra "must destroy the plane",
a sort of trigger, put in by hypnosis,
a deep and very professionally done, drug induced hypnosis,
one that the co-pilot himself would be unaware of
on a conscious level.
It did not sound at all like suicidal intention to me.
This would explain the deep regular breathing.
It also occurred after the pilot went over the upcoming
landing procedures with the co-pilot
which could have triggered
a deep hypnotic trigger event.
what?
do you just make stuff up as you go along?
Heh, this is a conspiracy site isn't it?
Well, I was throwing out a conspiracy.
Never claimed it was more than that, a hypothetical conspiracy theory.
Sounds as plausible as any conspiracy theory I have heard.
Why do you think it is implausible?
Improbable I understand, implausible, not really.
originally posted by: AdamuBureido
originally posted by: Ivar_Karlsen
aren't certain jets remote controllable [as an anti-hijacking system]?
No transport category airplanes are remote controllable.
keep believing that Fly-by-wire and remote hijack recovery does not exist or that it ain't hackable
originally posted by: raedar
Lufthansa revealed that Lubitz’s training in 2009 had been briefly interrupted, but was resumed after “his suitability as a candidate was re-established”. Asked about the reason for the interruption, the CEO, Carsten Spohr, said he was not allowed to say.
Link - live updates
originally posted by: intrptr
a reply to: AdmireTheDistance
I'd like to see what he was actually doing. They were at cruising altitude and on autopilot presumably. Maybe he had on head phones, was listening to loud music and dozing?
The reason I say that is the plane made a normal decent, not a crash dive. If dude was suicidal why didn't he put the plane into a vertical nose dive and get to the ground as quick as possible?
The only solution I come up with is he wasn't conscious for some reason, like suicide maybe. Are there firearms in the crew cabin?
originally posted by: interupt42
a reply to: ScientificRailgun
I don't think it happened in this case but never say never when it comes to technology , hacking and back doors.
A Backdoor Found In a "Flight-Critical" Chip Could Let Hackers Take Over a Plane
www.gizmodo.co.uk...
Thats just an example. Also there has been rise of purposely created back doors by gov't agencies around around the world. Then not to mention China being a critical manufacture of chips for the world which could be implanting back doors that would be impossible to catch during stress tests as long as the chips met the specifications.
Hardware back doors depending on design could bypass direct physical access for exploitation purposes.
originally posted by: ScientificRailgun
From what I understand, Fly-by-wire is a closed shell, meaning nobody without direct access to it's components can hack it.
originally posted by: AdamuBureido
originally posted by: Ivar_Karlsen
aren't certain jets remote controllable [as an anti-hijacking system]?
No transport category airplanes are remote controllable.
keep believing that Fly-by-wire and remote hijack recovery does not exist or that it ain't hackable
To give you an analogy, it would be like trying to hack a computer that's not on the internet or on a network. Just a single lone computer all by itself. You can't hack it without actually accessing the physical computer. Same deal here with fly-by-wire.
www.popularresistance.org...
New Intel-Based PC’s Permanently Hackable So you think no one can access your data because your computer is turned off. Heck it’s more than turned off, you even took the main hard drive out, and only the backup disk is inside. There is no operating system installed at all. So you KNOW you are safe. Frank from across the street is an alternative operating systems hobbyist, and he has tons of computers. He has Free BSD on a couple, his own compilation of Linux on another, a Mac for the wife, and even has Solaris on yet another. Frank knows systems security, so he cannot be hacked . . . or so he thinks. The government does not like Frank much, because they LOVE to look at everything. Privacy is a crime don’t you know, and it looks like Frank’s luck with privacy is about to run out. The new Intel Core vPro processors contain a new remote access feature which allows 100 percent remote access to a PC 100 percent of the time, even if the computer is turned off. Core vPro processors contain a second physical processor embedded within the main processor which has it’s own operating system embedded on the chip itself. As long as the power supply is available and and in working condition, it can be woken up by the Core vPro processor, which runs on the system’s phantom power and is able to quietly turn individual hardware components on and access anything on them.