It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Any high-res images from that location?
Sorry, if the Earth has approximately the same size in a 1964, 1968, 1969 and 2007 picture. Why should I believe in Neil Armstrong's picture that shows a fake small Earth ?
The lens used most often on the moon was a wide standard lens without magnification unlike a zoom or telephoto. From the Earth the moon appears just 0.5 degrees wide. From the Moon, the Earth appears 2 degrees wide. Photos taken with a standard lens are around 80 degrees across. Hence the width of the Earth will be just 1/40th of the picture's width across. Would it look huge? Nope!
BTW, did you know that Hubble allegedly discovered a pyramid on the moon?
originally posted by: ignorant_ape
a reply to: MerkabaMeditation
so its not relevant ?
care to address the absence of anomolies in sequence :
AS12-51-7504 ~ AS12-51-7511
one generation of AS12-51-7507 copies has an anomoly - and its been explained how this can occurr
originally posted by: MerkabaMeditation
There is a building present in the top left corner of this photo from NASA. The photo is numbered AS12-51-7507 and can be downloaded from a public nasa.gov server here and ano ther copy here:
AS12-51-7507 with building in left top corner Sou rce
Magnification of building
Now here is where it gets strange; all other images of AS12-51-7507 than the above I've seen online the building is not present - can it have been deliverately edited out? See here for a higher resolution picture.
AS12-51-7507 without building Source
Animation showing differences
Both source photos are available on public nasa.gov server her e and here.