Building in Apollo 12 photo AS12-51-7507 ?

Boy that really a small moon !

a reply to: Ove38

Fantastic, that comment deserves a star! I hail you, sir.

-MM

a reply to: MerkabaMeditation

i have explained everything presented in this thread - now why are you incapable or unwilling to understand / and or accept this ?

a reply to: jimmyx

the image in question was taken by the pilot of the CM [ command module ] , by the simple expedient of pointing the camera at the viewport - simples

originally posted by: ignorant_ape
a reply to: MerkabaMeditation

i have explained everything presented in this thread - now why are you incapable or unwilling to understand / and or accept this ?

Then what is the "road" anomality, or do you not acknowledge its existence?

originally posted by: MerkabaMeditation

originally posted by: zilebeliveunknown
On that second higher res photo, you can see a road leading to that ghost building or something.
Interesting...

Nice catch, here is a animation of the straight road in the highres image that is leading to the missing castle:

-MM

-MM

a reply to: MerkabaMeditation

your stupidity and or dishonesty is getting tiresome :

you are now using 2 different images of 2 different generations

one of which has the amomoly you lable " the castle "

and one of which has the anomoly you lable " the road "

have you actually stoped to ask - why dont both appear in the same image ????????????????

both are image processing artefacts [ from different generations ]

thier absence in other images from the series confirms this

i now need a drink

originally posted by: ignorant_ape
a reply to: MerkabaMeditation

your stupidity and or dishonesty is getting tiresome :

you are now using 2 different images of 2 different generations

one of which has the amomoly you lable " the castle "

and one of which has the anomoly you lable " the road "

have you actually stoped to ask - why dont both appear in the same image ????????????????

both are image processing artefacts [ from different generations ]

thier absence in other images from the series confirms this

i now need a drink

Get over yourself, I don't need your permission to take two versions of the same NASA image and compare them.

Now here is something that will make you choke on your banana liqueur; a closeup of the "road" anomality that you still have not explained:

Closeup of road anomality in AS-12-51-7507 NASA original that the closeup is from (3.5 MB) on public nasa.gov server

-MM

a reply to: MerkabaMeditation

sigh - which part of " image processing artefact " are you unwilling to or incapable of understanding ??????????????????

please explain why each anomoly you cite appears ONLY in different generation images - this is the big clue as to what it really is

your alledged " road " and alledged " castle " not even appearing in the same image file is the key to this

so you get over it - and i am not attacking you

hased on your post " strategy " here - asking :

are you stupid or dishonest ?

is not an attack - its merely a summary of the options

a reply to: MerkabaMeditation

a blunt question :

why doesnt a single origional image file contain both the aledged " road " and alledged " castle " ???

answer this rationally [ if you can ]

PS - the magbification of the aledged " road " shows clearly that its not a physical structure on the moon

originally posted by: MerkabaMeditation
a reply to: Ove38

Fantastic, that comment deserves a star! I hail you, sir.

-MM

This is the correct size and appearance of the Moon and the Earth ! The small moon and small earth in other pictures are models used in NASA training.

originally posted by: ignorant_ape
a reply to: MerkabaMeditation

a blunt question :

why doesnt a single origional image file contain both the aledged " road " and alledged " castle " ???

answer this rationally [ if you can ]

PS - the magbification of the aledged " road " shows clearly that its not a physical structure on the moon

The first image lacks the resolution for you to see the road, in the second image the moon castle anomality has been edited away. They (NASA?) obviously made an error by posting both versions of the same photo online.

-MM

a reply to: ignorant_ape

checking in a day later I see nothing has been answered still.

I've learned that this particular OP is more along the lines of the type who posts something as fact, then considers it "job done" and doesn't bother to defend their claims but instead continues to move along as if nothing was asked in the first place.

thanks for throwing some science behind my own questions, ape.

originally posted by: Shamrock6
a reply to: ignorant_ape

checking in a day later I see nothing has been answered still.

I've learned that this particular OP is more along the lines of the type who posts something as fact, then considers it "job done" and doesn't bother to defend their claims but instead continues to move along as if nothing was asked in the first place.

thanks for throwing some science behind my own questions, ape.

originally posted by: Shamrock6
a reply to: MerkabaMeditation

1) how did you identify the anamoly as a building?

I call it the "castle" anomality now as it looks more like a castle than a building, as I aswered here.

originally posted by: Shamrock6
a reply to: MerkabaMeditation
2) do you really think NASA has edited a "building" out but then went ahead and posted the pic with the building? Like they forgot that the picture they just edited had a reason to be edited and posted it then forgot they posted it?

NASA can make mistakes, they are only human. With the thousands of images produced by the Apollo Program it is quite probable that some unprocessed images were posted online.

What other questions have not answered? I've mostly seen you attacking me in person (as you continue to do).

-MM

Crashed space junk, there is plenty out there, passing asteroid pulled something out of earth's orbit that then went into a luna death dive, just how many burnt out rocket stages are there in orbit around earth? dead satellites? nose cones? lost gloves? wrenches? (spanners in Britspeak), trash containers? dead cosmonauts?

a reply to: MerkabaMeditation

now i know you are dishonest - thank you - this thread is done

your claim of " too low res " is a bare lie

you are just making crap up

originally posted by: ignorant_ape
a reply to: MerkabaMeditation

now i know you are dishonest - thank you - this thread is done

your claim of " too low res " is a bare lie

you are just making crap up

How is it a lie? Anyone can download the images and see that they have vastly different reolutions. The Castle anomality version has a resolution of 376x478 pixels:

Dow nload castle anomality version here
, while the high-resolution version with the road anomality has a resolution of 4075x4096 pixels:

Download road anomality version here

Anyone can download and compare the versions themselves and see that the high-resolution image has 93x the resolution of the one with the castle anomality. So just how am I lying?

-MM

a reply to: Ove38

It couldn't have anything to do with the focal length of the lens, of course.

originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: Ove38

It couldn't have anything to do with the focal length of the lens, of course.

No, Neil Armstrong's picture of earth is a bluff, look for yourself
Neil Armstrong's earth looks smaller than the moon seen from earth



Earth moon size comparison

a reply to: MerkabaMeditation

Pointing out your refusal to answer questions isn't attacking you. It's pointing out that you ignore questions.

So beyond saying "that's a building" and "that's a castle" you have nothing to support those claims other than its what you see, so that's what it is? No explanation as to HOW you came to those conclusions, just that you did and boom, done and dusted?

So your position is that NASA is human and messed up, but they only messed up after editing "the road" out of the picture, but not "the castle," then they edited "the castle" out but put the road back in, then they just forgot there was a reason why they were editing "the castle" and "the road" out of the pictures to begin with and posted pictures of both of them online for the world to see, and then forgot to check to see if they had posted the right picture or the wrong one. Seriously? Edit, edit, edit, ah screw it it's quitting time so let's just put everything up real quick and hope nobody notices.

Wow.

originally posted by: Ove38

originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: Ove38

It couldn't have anything to do with the focal length of the lens, of course.

No, Neil Armstrong's picture of earth is a bluff, look for yourself

Earth moon size comparison

I can see you're confused. Here, let me fix that for you: