It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Building in Apollo 12 photo AS12-51-7507 ?

page: 4
7
<< 1  2  3    5 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Dec, 24 2014 @ 08:41 AM
link   

originally posted by: Shamrock6
a reply to: MerkabaMeditation

Pointing out your refusal to answer questions isn't attacking you. It's pointing out that you ignore questions.


What a utter and blatant lie; here is your page 3 post where you attack me personally:


originally posted by: Shamrock6
a reply to: ignorant_ape
I've learned that this particular OP is more along the lines of the type who posts something as fact, then considers it "job done" and doesn't bother to defend their claims but instead continues to move along as if nothing was asked in the first place.


And now for your "questions":


originally posted by: Shamrock6
a reply to: MerkabaMeditation
So beyond saying "that's a building" and "that's a castle" you have nothing to support those claims other than its what you see, so that's what it is? No explanation as to HOW you came to those conclusions, just that you did and boom, done and dusted?


I call what I see; if it looks like a castle I call it a castle.


originally posted by: Shamrock6
a reply to: MerkabaMeditation
So your position is that NASA is human and messed up, but they only messed up after editing "the road" out of the picture, but not "the castle," then they edited "the castle" out but put the road back in, then they just forgot there was a reason why they were editing "the castle" and "the road" out of the pictures to begin with and posted pictures of both of them online for the world to see, and then forgot to check to see if they had posted the right picture or the wrong one. Seriously? Edit, edit, edit, ah screw it it's quitting time so let's just put everything up real quick and hope nobody notices.
Wow.


If you would bother to read the posts in this thread you would have noticed that I've already answered your question here:


originally posted by: MerkabaMeditation
The first image lacks the resolution for you to see the road, in the second image the moon castle anomality has been edited away. They (NASA?) obviously made an error by posting both versions of the same photo online.
[/quote]

-MM

edit on 24-12-2014 by MerkabaMeditation because: (no reason given)

edit on 24-12-2014 by MerkabaMeditation because: (no reason given)




posted on Dec, 24 2014 @ 09:04 AM
link   

originally posted by: ignorant_ape
a reply to: MerkabaMeditation

sigh - which part of " image processing artefact " are you unwilling to or incapable of understanding ??????????????????


1. You claim a image processing error caused the road anomality, then just how did it occur and in what part of the development process? In the thousands of images from the Apollo Program can you find a single other photo that has the same kind of processing error since you are so sure about it?

2. Both images contain anomalities, one has the castle and the other has the road, what are the odds that the road on the second image ends where the castle is on the first image?

See for yourself:
Road on second image ends where the castle on the first image is located.

-MM

edit on 24-12-2014 by MerkabaMeditation because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 24 2014 @ 09:28 AM
link   

originally posted by: DJW001

originally posted by: Ove38

originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: Ove38

It couldn't have anything to do with the focal length of the lens, of course.

No, Neil Armstrong's picture of earth is a bluff, look for yourself



Earth moon size comparison


I can see you're confused. Here, let me fix that for you:



The earth would look 4 times larger than the moon rise we usually see.



posted on Dec, 24 2014 @ 09:38 AM
link   
Why the f*** would aliens build a small wooden church on the moon........seriously?



posted on Dec, 24 2014 @ 09:48 AM
link   

originally posted by: Ove38

originally posted by: DJW001

originally posted by: Ove38

originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: Ove38

It couldn't have anything to do with the focal length of the lens, of course.

No, Neil Armstrong's picture of earth is a bluff, look for yourself



Earth moon size comparison


I can see you're confused. Here, let me fix that for you:



The earth would look 4 times larger than the moon rise we usually see.


Correct. The Moon as seen from Earth is only 1/2 degree across, about half the width of a finger at arm's length:



Try measuring the Moon when it is up some time. Earth would appear four times larger, the size of two fingers. The size of anything in a photograph depends on the lens and whether or not the image has been cropped. maybe this will help:

www.cfa.harvard.edu...



posted on Dec, 24 2014 @ 12:46 PM
link   
Nonsense, also this Lunar Orbiter 1 picture from 1964 proves that Earth looks bigger from the moon. Only Neil Armstrong's picture of Earth shows a fake small Earth


1964


1968


1969


2007



edit on 24-12-2014 by Ove38 because: text fix



posted on Dec, 24 2014 @ 12:54 PM
link   

originally posted by: blackrabbit1
Why the f*** would aliens build a small wooden church on the moon........seriously?

Marriages?



posted on Dec, 24 2014 @ 01:10 PM
link   
a reply to: Ove38

3 diffenent cameras , 3 different focal lengths - one erroneous conclusion [ yours ]



posted on Dec, 24 2014 @ 01:10 PM
link   

originally posted by: Blue Shift

originally posted by: blackrabbit1
Why the f*** would aliens build a small wooden church on the moon........seriously?

Marriages?


I think this won the entire thread



posted on Dec, 24 2014 @ 01:21 PM
link   

originally posted by: ignorant_ape
a reply to: Ove38

3 diffenent cameras , 3 different focal lengths - one erroneous conclusion [ yours ]


Sorry, if the Earth has approximately the same size in a 1964, 1968, 1969 and 2007 picture. Why should I believe in Neil Armstrong's picture that shows a fake small Earth ?


Neil Armstrong's picture
edit on 24-12-2014 by Ove38 because: text fix



posted on Dec, 24 2014 @ 01:22 PM
link   
Good lead in!


The Apollo program was announced in May 1961, but the choice among competing techniques for achieving a landing and return was not resolved until considerable further study.


I remember talking about this with my grandfather, he asked me questions about fuel usage for the return to Earth, how to keep the astronauts cool in the thermos of space etc etc. I suggested the American children were being misled.

My grandmother explained about the priestess of Apollo who sat over the crag and spoke in an almost unintelligible voice.

After the Apollo mission Michael Heizer a sculptor took a 340 ton moon rock and placed it over a crag at the entrance to the LACMA's campus. Notice how wide the crag is and the care taken to balance the rock.



He also did an artistic rendition of the moon set named "Munich Rotary".



I don't think anything was edited out of the NASA photographs.
The road building equipment just has to orbit over the same area several times..



posted on Dec, 24 2014 @ 01:32 PM
link   
Do you bother to read the replies to your posts? Apparently not. a reply to: Ove38



posted on Dec, 24 2014 @ 01:42 PM
link   

originally posted by: DJW001
Do you bother to read the replies to your posts? Apparently not. a reply to: Ove38



Even this Chang'e 5-T1 picture from October 2014 shows a bigger Earth than Neil Armstrong's Earth




posted on Dec, 24 2014 @ 02:29 PM
link   
Are you freaking serious? What part of the size of the Earth in an image depends on the lens and how the image has been cropped, enlarged or otherwise processed do you not understand?a reply to: Ove38



posted on Dec, 24 2014 @ 03:05 PM
link   

T’was the night before Christmas, and way out in space

The Apollo 8 crew had just won the Moon race;

The headsets were hung by the consoles with care,

In hopes that Chris Kraft soon would be there;

Frank Borman was nestled all snug in his bed,

While visions of REFSMMATS danced in his head;

And Anders in his couch, and Jim Lovell in the bay,

Were racking their brains over a computer display....


When out of the DSKY there arose such a clatter,

Frank sprang from his bed to see what was the matter.

Away to the sextant he flew like a flash,

To make sure they weren’t going to crash.

The light on the breast of the moon’s jagged crust

Gave a lustre of green cheese to the grey lunar dust.

When what to his wondering eyes should appear

But a Burma Shave sign saying: ‘Kilroy was here!’


But Frank was no fool, he knew pretty quick

That they had been first... this must be a trick.

More rapid than rockets his curses they came,

He turned to his crewmen and called them a name;

“Now Lovell! Now Anders! Now don’t think I’d fall

For that old joke you’ve written up on the wall!’


They spoke not a word, but grinning like elves,

And laughed at their joke in spite of themselves.

Frank sprang to his couch, to the ship gave a thrust,

And away they all flew past the grey lunar dust.

But we heard them exclaim, ere they flew ’round the moon:

“Merry Christmas to Earth; We’ll be back there real soon!”



posted on Dec, 27 2014 @ 04:44 AM
link   
The castle seems to be located somewhere around Perry B in the Montes Riphaeus region on the moon with approx. 8°S 12°W coordinates.

Perry B

Any high-res images from that location?

-MM



posted on Dec, 27 2014 @ 05:02 AM
link   

originally posted by: MerkabaMeditation
The castle seems to be located somewhere around Perry B in the Montes Riphaeus region on the moon with approx. 8°S 12°W coordinates.

Perry B

Any high-res images from that location?

-MM


Yes. Why don't you post some?



posted on Dec, 27 2014 @ 05:19 AM
link   

originally posted by: DJW001

originally posted by: MerkabaMeditation
The castle seems to be located somewhere around Perry B in the Montes Riphaeus region on the moon with approx. 8°S 12°W coordinates.

Perry B

Any high-res images from that location?

-MM


Yes. Why don't you post some?


Sure, care to tell me where they are at?

-MM



posted on Dec, 27 2014 @ 05:27 AM
link   

originally posted by: MerkabaMeditation

originally posted by: DJW001

originally posted by: MerkabaMeditation
The castle seems to be located somewhere around Perry B in the Montes Riphaeus region on the moon with approx. 8°S 12°W coordinates.

Perry B

Any high-res images from that location?

-MM


Yes. Why don't you post some?


Sure, care to tell me where they are at?

-MM


You can start here:

lroc.sese.asu.edu...

Of course, you can settle for:

www.google.com... ... but that is notorious for its own imaging artifacts.



posted on Dec, 27 2014 @ 05:45 AM
link   
It looks like Battersea power station to me.Maybe it was easier to get planning permission to convert it into flats and a shopping mall if they moved it to the moon,the one next to the Thames is obviously a fake in that case.They would of course had to land some guys on the moon to unload the cargo ship that took it there,I guess this blows ALL the conspiracy theories out of the water at the same time?



new topics

top topics



 
7
<< 1  2  3    5 >>

log in

join