It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Agent_USA_Supporter
reply to post by reject
The Tartars are only 5% to 10% of the population.
British scholar rails at police seizure of anti-Stalin archive
Historian condemns raid on human rights group as bid to whitewash repression of the Soviet era
Luke Harding in Moscow
The Observer, Saturday 6 December 2008
Eminent British historian Orlando Figes yesterday accused the Russian authorities of trying to 'rehabilitate the Stalinist regime' after armed police seized an entire archive last week detailing repression in the Soviet Union.
Figes, professor of history at Birkbeck, a London University college, condemned the raid on Memorial, a Russian human rights organisation. He said that the police had also taken material used in his latest book, The Whisperers, which details family life in Stalin's Russia.
On Thursday, armed and masked men from the investigative committee of the Russian general prosecutor's office burst into Memorial's St Petersburg office.
After a search of several hours, they confiscated its entire archive - memoirs, photographs, interviews, and other unique documents detailing the history of the gulag and the names of many of its victims.
Yesterday Figes claimed the raid 'was clearly intended to intimidate Memorial'. The confiscated archive included unique documents detailing the 'Soviet terror from 1917 to the 1960s,' he said, adding that the office was 'an important centre for historical research' and a 'voice for tens of thousands of victims of repression in Leningrad'. He said he believed the raid was 'a serious challenge to freedom of expression' in Russia: 'It is part of a campaign to rewrite Soviet history and rehabilitate the Stalinist regime.'
...
Armed Russian police raid homes of anti-Putin activists in huge crackdown which critics describe as a 'return to the days of Stalin'
•10 top Russian activists who represent biggest threat to Stalin are targeted
•Hello1937 was trending on Russian-language version of Twitter - referring to the worst year of Stalin's purges
•More than a dozen officers beat down doors at anti-corruption blogger Alexei Navalny's home
By Will Stewart
PUBLISHED: 10:15 EST, 11 June 2012 | UPDATED: 05:57 EST, 12 June 2012
Armed Russian police today raided the homes of anti-Putin activists today ahead of a mass demonstration in a major new crackdown on dissent.
The fresh wave of arrests was today compared with the days of Stalin by opponents on Russian language Twitter.
Hello1937 was trending on the social networking site - referring to the year 1937 which was seen as the worst for Stalin purges.
...
List of journalists killed in Russia
The dangers to journalists in Russia have been well known since the early 1990s but concern at the number of unsolved killings soared after Anna Politkovskaya's murder in Moscow on 7 October 2006. While international monitors spoke of several dozen deaths, some sources within Russia talked of over two hundred fatalities.[1] The evidence has since been examined and documented in two reports, published in Russian and English, by international organizations.
А wide-ranging investigation by the International Federation of Journalists into the deaths of journalists in Russia was published in June 2009. At the same time the IFJ launched an online database[2][3] which documents over three hundred deaths and disappearances since 1993. Both the report Partial Justice[4] (Russian version: Частичное правосудие[5]) and the database depend on the information gathered in Russia over the last 16 years by the country's own media monitors, the Glasnost Defense Foundation and the Center for Journalism in Extreme Situations.
In its September 2009 report the Committee to Protect Journalists repeated its conclusion that Russia was one of the deadliest countries in the world for journalists and added that it remains among the worst at solving their murders. The Anatomy of Injustice[6] (Russian version: Анатомия безнаказанности[7]) offers an account of the deaths of 17 journalists in Russia since 2000. They died or were killed, the CPJ is convinced, because of the work they were doing and in only one case, it notes, has there been a partially successful prosecution.
Sparkymedic
In this case, it seems I have no choice but to attack your "facts". Your OP has been totally ripped apart by MANY on here and other websites. Are you on the State Dept./ NED pay roll? Seriously, why are you picking sides here? There are no side to choose. If Ukraine was serious about wanting a better future it would break from the status quo and you wouldn't have it allowing US/EU meddling.
...
reject
it appears tartars boycotted the referendum altogether...
At any rate, 97% overwhelmingly wants to be united with Russia.
Would you rather a bloody and violent overthrow of leadership like they did in Kiev or a peaceful democratic process like what happened in Crimea?
Which do you think is more legitimate, a coup d'état or a referendum?
sosobad
reply to post by ElectricUniverse
I don't know if you are trolling your own thread or just slow but it was 97% of the people that voted, voted for yes, not a 97% turn out....
ElectricUniverse
sosobad
reply to post by ElectricUniverse
I don't know if you are trolling your own thread or just slow but it was 97% of the people that voted, voted for yes, not a 97% turn out....
Yet more insults and derogatory comments... So, you are telling me that 36.42% of the population which constitutes Ukrainians and Tatars didn't vote?... People who have showed concern for the situation in their country?.... People who have protested in Crimea?... Then there are the ethnic Russians, like the ethnic Russian family who lived in Crimea who also say they are against the joining of Crimea with Russia... and I am the slow one?...
sosobad
reply to post by ElectricUniverse
I don't know if you are trolling your own thread or just slow but it was 97% of the people that voted, voted for yes, not a 97% turn out....
sosobad
reply to post by ElectricUniverse
Ok I'll try this one more time real slow for you, it was reported that that 73% of the population voted, you still with me? OF that 73%, 97% voted yes and 3% voted no. There was independent international sources to oversee the vote count. You following? So it was wasn't 97% turn out, just a 97% yes vote, what is so hard to grasp about that?
Eta: How you are still getting stars for not being able to work that out is shocking.edit on 17-3-2014 by sosobad because: (no reason given)
bitsforbytes
reply to post by ElectricUniverse
www.youtube.com...
Watch this again, I don't think you get it.