It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by AwakeinNM
Originally posted by Indigo5
Originally posted by AwakeinNM
This just goes to show you the real mindset behind the socialist revolutionary. His goals would be much more easily achievable if those NRA members weren't armed, wouldn't it?
Preemptive strike? Anyone? I'd say that was an act of aggression that needs to be dealt with.
(A) What makes you think that NRA members are the only ones with guns?
(B) You might want to re-think making blanket threats of violence in this forum or in this context....or anywhere else for that matter.edit on 18-12-2012 by Indigo5 because: (no reason given)
I knew there would be someone like you to point out that it is perfectly fine for a socialist politician to make blanket threats against a group he opposes, but it's not okay for someone like me to infer the same against them.
Socialism. They're going to try it and get civil war instead. Then insurrection. These are not threats - they are predictions.
Originally posted by neo96
They need to [be] wiped off the face of the earth," he wrote, speaking of the NRA and those who support owning guns.
So I need to be wiped from the face of the earth eh?
So I am a domestic terrorist eh?
The NRA hasn't stopped anything eh?
Neither had government, their laws for an act that is already illegal murder.
I coiuld sink to that guys level, but everyone knows all us nra members and gun owners are pure evil however none of us pulled the trigger in CT that day.
If some people want to live in a country where only the police,criminals, and military are the only ones that have guns feel free I don't.
edit on 17-12-2012 by neo96 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by hadriana
Isn't it illegal to call for someone to be killed like that - inciting violence against others or a group or something?
I thought it was....
Originally posted by Indigo5
*snip*As for the credibility of an argument where a single "tweet" by a single idiot being representitive of several hundred million folks? Well....Please go ahead and continue to defend that logic......
Originally posted by LadyGreenEyes
Originally posted by Indigo5
*snip*As for the credibility of an argument where a single "tweet" by a single idiot being representitive of several hundred million folks? Well....Please go ahead and continue to defend that logic......
"Several hundred million people"??? The entire nation is only about 305 million, so where are the "several hundred million" Democrats? How is that claim logical or credible?
Originally posted by Indigo5
Originally posted by LadyGreenEyes
Originally posted by Indigo5
*snip*As for the credibility of an argument where a single "tweet" by a single idiot being representitive of several hundred million folks? Well....Please go ahead and continue to defend that logic......
"Several hundred million people"??? The entire nation is only about 305 million, so where are the "several hundred million" Democrats? How is that claim logical or credible?
The OP took a "tweet" by a man in Texas and extrapolated it to anyone opposed to unregulated gun ownership.
That is several hundred Million folks worldwide.