It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by miniatus
I get instant alerts on my phone when any EQ is over 6, but 6-7 are really not all that powerful.. they can do some damage but the richter scale is on a curve, it's not linear .. so 1 to 2, 2 to 3, 3 to 4 .. etc.. are not evenly spaced.. when you get to 7-8, 8-9 they take a MASSIVE jump in strength.. the biggest concern with quakes like these are tsunamis, or hitting in populated areas that aren't properly fortified for earthquakes ..
There's certainly a lot of seismic activity going on and I wouldn't be shocked if another major quake hit along the ring of fire.. I fear California is due for one but I hope not.. it's been a while and they are right in line for one.. it's frightening but it could happen at any time.. whenever there's a major event in the ring, it triggers others along the ring..edit on 22-6-2011 by miniatus because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by UtahRosebud
WTH does that have to do with ANY of what the OP asked???????????
And FYI - earthquakes in the 6-7 range, ARE powerful! Lived through MANY in all ranges, including the 7.1 Loma Prieta in 1989 in California. And wasn't it a 6.3 that brought down ChristChurch?!
Geez... go do some REAL research before you come in here and spew. PLEASE!
To the OP... more than likely what you are seeing are the waves, as they travel across the planet, from the 6.7 that hit Japan earlier. Trust me, if the alarm bells were sounding, you would find that happening in the Yellowstone thread, located here:
ATS Thread - What's Going On At Yellowstone?
Originally posted by Heartisblack
Japan had two quakes,
6.7 and 4 seconds later a 6.8.
They don't need anymore quakes
MAG UTC DATE-TIME
y/m/d h:m:s LAT
deg LON
deg DEPTH
km Region
MAP 3.3 2011/06/22 23:44:00 58.263 -151.225 42.7 KODIAK ISLAND REGION, ALASKA
MAP 3.4 2011/06/22 22:34:38 51.922 -170.958 31.1 FOX ISLANDS, ALEUTIAN ISLANDS, ALASKA
MAP 5.2 2011/06/22 22:16:56 -21.744 -179.068 554.3 FIJI REGION
MAP 2.8 2011/06/22 22:05:00 58.122 -154.663 78.1 ALASKA PENINSULA
MAP 6.7 2011/06/22 21:50:48 39.980 142.247 32.0 NEAR THE EAST COAST OF HONSHU, JAPAN
MAP 5.1 2011/06/22 20:43:48 37.612 144.329 10.6 OFF THE EAST COAST OF HONSHU, JAPAN
MAP 3.1 2011/06/22 20:00:16 39.324 -119.987 6.3 NEVADA
MAP 3.3 2011/06/22 19:59:51 39.318 -119.978 7.1 NEVADA
MAP 4.3 2011/06/22 16:58:50 42.708 138.402 234.1 EASTERN SEA OF JAPAN
MAP 2.8 2011/06/22 16:37:59 18.212 -65.056 55.4 VIRGIN ISLANDS REGION
MAP 2.5 2011/06/22 15:49:50 63.217 -150.396 128.2 CENTRAL ALASKA
MAP 4.7 2011/06/22 15:48:28 33.958 89.333 41.8 WESTERN XIZANG
MAP 5.2 2011/06/22 14:28:59 40.040 142.769 40.9 NEAR THE EAST COAST OF HONSHU, JAPAN
MAP 5.3 2011/06/22 13:57:31 -27.920 -66.501 163.4 CATAMARCA, ARGENTINA
MAP 4.7 2011/06/22 11:55:59 33.884 89.274 51.7 WESTERN XIZANG
MAP 4.6 2011/06/22 11:35:10 35.538 141.058 38.5 NEAR THE EAST COAST OF HONSHU, JAPAN
MAP 2.7 2011/06/22 11:33:51 31.863 -114.983 10.0 BAJA CALIFORNIA, MEXICO
MAP 2.8 2011/06/22 10:54:57 42.203 -121.888 6.1 OREGON
MAP 2.8 2011/06/22 10:33:38 19.158 -68.105 50.9 DOMINICAN REPUBLIC REGION
MAP 3.4 2011/06/22 10:30:25 31.872 -114.931 10.0 BAJA CALIFORNIA, MEXICO
MAP 3.0 2011/06/22 10:28:48 19.262 -67.941 24.7 DOMINICAN REPUBLIC REGION
MAP 2.7 2011/06/22 10:07:30 45.302 -73.099 7.9 ST. LAWRENCE VALLEY REG., QUEBEC, CANADA
MAP 2.9 2011/06/22 07:37:33 18.439 -65.215 87.1 PUERTO RICO REGION
MAP 3.7 2011/06/22 07:18:47 19.507 -66.302 38.4 PUERTO RICO REGION
MAP 2.6 2011/06/22 05:08:38 18.767 -66.726 34.9 PUERTO RICO REGION
MAP 4.8 2011/06/22 04:45:13 25.996 128.394 2.4 RYUKYU ISLANDS, JAPAN
MAP 3.2 2011/06/22 03:20:24 59.742 -136.589 5.9 SOUTHEASTERN ALASKA
MAP 3.1 2011/06/22 02:00:27 32.076 -116.720 18.8 BAJA CALIFORNIA, MEXICO
biggest concern with quakes like these are tsunamis, or hitting in populated areas that aren't properly fortified for earthquakes ..
In 1935, Charles Richter developed the local magnitude, ML scale for moderate-size (3 < ML < 7) earthquakes in southern California. The ML scale is often called the “Richter scale” by the press and the public. All of the currently used methods for measuring earthquake magnitude (ML, duration magnitude mD, surface-wave magnitude MS, teleseismic body-wave magnitude mb, moment magnitude M, etc.) yield results that are consistent with ML. In fact, most modern methods for measuring magnitude were designed to be consistent with the Richter scale. There is some confusion, however, about earthquake magnitude, primarily in the media, because seismologists often no longer follow Richter's original methodology. Richter's original methodology is no longer used because it does not give reliable results when applied to M >= 7 earthquakes and it was not designed to use data from earthquakes recorded at epicentral distances greater than about 600 km. It is, therefore, useful to separate the method and the scale in releasing estimates of magnitude to the public.
Originally posted by miniatus
reply to post by UtahRosebud
I also want to point out that I said
biggest concern with quakes like these are tsunamis, or hitting in populated areas that aren't properly fortified for earthquakes ..
If a quake in that range hits a populated area that's not properly fortified for it then yes it can be quite a bit more serious.. I never denied that either.
Originally posted by UtahRosebud
Originally posted by miniatus
reply to post by UtahRosebud
I also want to point out that I said
biggest concern with quakes like these are tsunamis, or hitting in populated areas that aren't properly fortified for earthquakes ..
If a quake in that range hits a populated area that's not properly fortified for it then yes it can be quite a bit more serious.. I never denied that either.
That's great and can definitely be true. However, as the OP was asking about Yellowstone... and Yellowstone happens to be located in the middle of our country, far away from coastlines... please enlighten me on what effects a tsunami would have on Yellowstone?
Originally posted by UtahRosebud
Originally posted by Heartisblack
Japan had two quakes,
6.7 and 4 seconds later a 6.8.
They don't need anymore quakes
Please provide facts to back that up. According to the USGS, only one quake struck. Here is a list of ALL quakes of magnitude 2.5 and higher for the day:
MAG UTC DATE-TIME
y/m/d h:m:s LAT
deg LON
deg DEPTH
km Region
MAP 3.3 2011/06/22 23:44:00 58.263 -151.225 42.7 KODIAK ISLAND REGION, ALASKA
MAP 3.4 2011/06/22 22:34:38 51.922 -170.958 31.1 FOX ISLANDS, ALEUTIAN ISLANDS, ALASKA
MAP 5.2 2011/06/22 22:16:56 -21.744 -179.068 554.3 FIJI REGION
MAP 2.8 2011/06/22 22:05:00 58.122 -154.663 78.1 ALASKA PENINSULA
MAP 6.7 2011/06/22 21:50:48 39.980 142.247 32.0 NEAR THE EAST COAST OF HONSHU, JAPAN
MAP 5.1 2011/06/22 20:43:48 37.612 144.329 10.6 OFF THE EAST COAST OF HONSHU, JAPAN
MAP 3.1 2011/06/22 20:00:16 39.324 -119.987 6.3 NEVADA
MAP 3.3 2011/06/22 19:59:51 39.318 -119.978 7.1 NEVADA
MAP 4.3 2011/06/22 16:58:50 42.708 138.402 234.1 EASTERN SEA OF JAPAN
MAP 2.8 2011/06/22 16:37:59 18.212 -65.056 55.4 VIRGIN ISLANDS REGION
MAP 2.5 2011/06/22 15:49:50 63.217 -150.396 128.2 CENTRAL ALASKA
MAP 4.7 2011/06/22 15:48:28 33.958 89.333 41.8 WESTERN XIZANG
MAP 5.2 2011/06/22 14:28:59 40.040 142.769 40.9 NEAR THE EAST COAST OF HONSHU, JAPAN
MAP 5.3 2011/06/22 13:57:31 -27.920 -66.501 163.4 CATAMARCA, ARGENTINA
MAP 4.7 2011/06/22 11:55:59 33.884 89.274 51.7 WESTERN XIZANG
MAP 4.6 2011/06/22 11:35:10 35.538 141.058 38.5 NEAR THE EAST COAST OF HONSHU, JAPAN
MAP 2.7 2011/06/22 11:33:51 31.863 -114.983 10.0 BAJA CALIFORNIA, MEXICO
MAP 2.8 2011/06/22 10:54:57 42.203 -121.888 6.1 OREGON
MAP 2.8 2011/06/22 10:33:38 19.158 -68.105 50.9 DOMINICAN REPUBLIC REGION
MAP 3.4 2011/06/22 10:30:25 31.872 -114.931 10.0 BAJA CALIFORNIA, MEXICO
MAP 3.0 2011/06/22 10:28:48 19.262 -67.941 24.7 DOMINICAN REPUBLIC REGION
MAP 2.7 2011/06/22 10:07:30 45.302 -73.099 7.9 ST. LAWRENCE VALLEY REG., QUEBEC, CANADA
MAP 2.9 2011/06/22 07:37:33 18.439 -65.215 87.1 PUERTO RICO REGION
MAP 3.7 2011/06/22 07:18:47 19.507 -66.302 38.4 PUERTO RICO REGION
MAP 2.6 2011/06/22 05:08:38 18.767 -66.726 34.9 PUERTO RICO REGION
MAP 4.8 2011/06/22 04:45:13 25.996 128.394 2.4 RYUKYU ISLANDS, JAPAN
MAP 3.2 2011/06/22 03:20:24 59.742 -136.589 5.9 SOUTHEASTERN ALASKA
MAP 3.1 2011/06/22 02:00:27 32.076 -116.720 18.8 BAJA CALIFORNIA, MEXICO
Source - USGS