It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Section31
reply to post by manalien
Ah! So, you understand how I infused philosophy and a science into one paradigm.
Understanding how a culture functions can give great insight into why certain artworks are created. When I look at the crystal skulls for example, I see a society based upon a high admiration for death (self evident). The materials also indicate a sculpting complexity in which is uncommon for such a primitive society. However, we have seen massive Egyptian statues, which an intense attention to detail was a focal point. Was there some type of domestic cross cultural influence, or were these people influenced by something else?
If you consider the fact that Mayans and Egyptians created pyramid structures, we would have to entertain three schools of thought. (1) The Mayans were influenced by the Egyptians. -or- (2) Pyramids (triangles) are embedded into our psychological make up. -or- (3) Some unknown factor was an influence. Before we get to consider an unknown element, we have to eliminate the other more Earthly based ones.
Since we do not have enough information for numbers one and two, more research into the background of the pyramids needs to be done. We do know that triangles, squares, and circles are everywhere. Simplistic forms in which we use for shelter, transportation, and everything else. So, we can check that one off. We must not stop there though. While I am doing research on the subject, I will need to see if someone or something from Egypt made it over to the Mayans. Both share an eerie interest in the afterlife, and to some extent in nightmarish forms.
However, there is a Spanish influence in this whole mess. I will have to consider a third influence after all. Did they bring something over?
edit on 9-10-2010 by Section31 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Section31
reply to post by CHA0S
I can see merit behind such philosophical debate; however, I have a simple question for everyone. If modern mankind can make books of science-fiction and mythologies, what would stop a future society from not believing they were real events, places, and people?
Majority of the symbolism found in art, sculptures, and engravings comes from mythological and superstitious stories, which they have been passing down from one generation to the next.
Association of Ideas, or Mental association, is a term used principally in the history of philosophy and of psychology to refer to explanations about the conditions under which representations arise in consciousness, and also for a principle put forward by an important historical school of thinkers to account generally for the succession of mental phenomena. One idea was thought to follow another in consciousness if it were associated by some principle. The three most commonly asserted principles of association were similarity, contiguity, and contrast, but numerous others had been added by the nineteenth century. By the end of the nineteenth century physiological psychology was so altering the approach to this subject that much of the older associationist theory was rejected.
Nevertheless, the everyday observation of the association of one idea or memory with another gives a face validity to the notion. In addition, the notion of association between ideas and behavior gave some early impetus to behaviorist thinking. The core ideas of associationist thinking recur in some recent thought on cognition, especially consciousness.
Wikipedia's Article on "Association of Ideas"
Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by Section31
What is wrong with the idea of independent development? Do you think separate cultures cannot come up with similar architectural designs? It is not as if a pyramid is particularly complex after all. It is the most simple form for a tall structure.
Originally posted by Section31
Could humanity be experimenting with time travel, and somehow we accidentally influenced some aspect of our past
The glyphs are a result of both erosion of the stone surface (evident elsewhere in the temple) and the process of filling in and re-carving the stone to replace some of the original hieroglyphics. The technical term for such a surface that has been written on more than once is a palimpsest. The usurping and modifying of inscriptions was common in ancient Egypt throughout its history. The Abydos glyph was modified at least once in antiquity, and perhaps twice. Some of the filling has fallen out in places where the older and the newer inscriptions overlap, and the result is unique and odd-looking.
The text is part of the titulary of Ramesses II and can be translated as "The one of the Two Ladies, who suppresses the nine foreign countries." This replaces the royal titulary of Seti I that was originally carved into the stone. More technically, the actual "helicopter" seems to be a portion of the psd.t sign and the X3s.t sign on top of each other, with portions missing. An apparent change in scale also mucks things up.
Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by gaurdian2012
I can honestly say that there is no evidence that they represent extraterrestrials. I can honestly say there is no reason they cannot be artistic representations of spiritual concepts and myths.
Originally posted by Balkan
Who is suprised this got so many flags?? ...blah blah blah, yada yada yada..... Proof once again the majority of forum users on this site embrace ignorance wholeheartedly.