It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: ScepticScot
Any evidence that people who are double vaxed are more likely to catch covid?
I
originally posted by: DaRAGE
originally posted by: ScepticScot
Any evidence that people who are double vaxed are more likely to catch covid?
I knew when i posted that without proof that this would happen. I was on my phone. There is proof out there, it's in one of the documents that is linked to a post around here. let me find that for you...
uk study - pdf
See page 13, the last two columns. 2 x vaccinated from ages 30 - 80+ are more likely to catch covid. In the 40-49 category Vaccine defence at preventing catching covid is down a whooping 109% compared to unvaccinated.
See page 14, the last two columns. 2 x vaccinated have less hospitalisation than unvaccinated.
originally posted by: DaRAGE
originally posted by: ScepticScot
Any evidence that people who are double vaxed are more likely to catch covid?
I knew when i posted that without proof that this would happen. I was on my phone. There is proof out there, it's in one of the documents that is linked to a post around here. let me find that for you...
uk study - pdf
See page 13, the last two columns. 2 x vaccinated from ages 30 - 80+ are more likely to catch covid. In the 40-49 category Vaccine defence at preventing catching covid is down a whooping 109% compared to unvaccinated.
See page 14, the last two columns. 2 x vaccinated have less hospitalisation than unvaccinated.
Britain has a extremely high rate of double vaccination so it stands to reason that they accou3fir a high percentage of just about everything.
originally posted by: ScepticScot
originally posted by: DaRAGE
originally posted by: ScepticScot
Any evidence that people who are double vaxed are more likely to catch covid?
I knew when i posted that without proof that this would happen. I was on my phone. There is proof out there, it's in one of the documents that is linked to a post around here. let me find that for you...
uk study - pdf
See page 13, the last two columns. 2 x vaccinated from ages 30 - 80+ are more likely to catch covid. In the 40-49 category Vaccine defence at preventing catching covid is down a whooping 109% compared to unvaccinated.
See page 14, the last two columns. 2 x vaccinated have less hospitalisation than unvaccinated.
Here is also a study showing your are far less likely to be infected if vacinated.
www.imperial.ac.uk...
originally posted by: ScepticScot
I suspect that table is being misinterpreted as your link also gives vaccine effectiveness against infection at 65 to 80% meaning your are far less likely to get infected if vacinated.
Results
The rate of a positive COVID-19 test varies by age and vaccination status. The rate of a positive
COVID-19 test is substantially lower in vaccinated individuals compared to unvaccinated
individuals up to the age of 39. In individuals aged greater than 40, the rate of a positive
COVID-19 test is higher in vaccinated individuals compared to unvaccinated. This is likely to be
due to a variety of reasons, including differences in the population of vaccinated and
unvaccinated people as well as differences in testing patterns.
The rate of hospitalisation within 28 days of a positive COVID-19 test increases with age, and is
substantially greater in unvaccinated individuals compared to vaccinated individuals.
The rate of death within 28 days or within 60 days of a positive COVID-19 test increases with
age, and again is substantially greater in unvaccinated individuals compared to fully vaccinated
individuals.
originally posted by: DaRAGE
originally posted by: ScepticScot
I suspect that table is being misinterpreted as your link also gives vaccine effectiveness against infection at 65 to 80% meaning your are far less likely to get infected if vacinated.
Uk Study - pdf
Actually no the study I posted shows the results as seen on page 12:
Results
The rate of a positive COVID-19 test varies by age and vaccination status. The rate of a positive
COVID-19 test is substantially lower in vaccinated individuals compared to unvaccinated
individuals up to the age of 39. In individuals aged greater than 40, the rate of a positive
COVID-19 test is higher in vaccinated individuals compared to unvaccinated. This is likely to be
due to a variety of reasons, including differences in the population of vaccinated and
unvaccinated people as well as differences in testing patterns.
The rate of hospitalisation within 28 days of a positive COVID-19 test increases with age, and is
substantially greater in unvaccinated individuals compared to vaccinated individuals.
The rate of death within 28 days or within 60 days of a positive COVID-19 test increases with
age, and again is substantially greater in unvaccinated individuals compared to fully vaccinated
individuals.
The study you posted is from May to July 2021. My study is from Weeks 36-39 which is September 6th to October 3rd.
I am telling you. Efficacy goes down 8% per month and so does your immune system because these vaxes nuke your natural immune system.
As has been shown in multiple studies using proper statistical analysis as opposed to uninformed speculation on a conspiracy site.
The researchers estimated that more than 900,000 COVID-19 hospitalizations occurred through November 2020. Based on their model, 30% of these hospitalizations were attributable to obesity, 26% to hypertension, 21% to diabetes, and 12% to heart failure.
originally posted by: puzzled2
a reply to: ScepticScot
As has been shown in multiple studies using proper statistical analysis as opposed to uninformed speculation on a conspiracy site.
Which you provide no link to leaving your comment just hearsay on a conspiracy site.
You also are changing the parameters to the counts - any unvaccinated case counts but only the serious cases & deaths are counted when vaccinated.
originally posted by: puzzled2
a reply to: AaarghZombies
Wouldn't a fat passport be serving the same outcome as a vaxx passport - create fewer serious cases & deaths.
But there are no profits in healthy people.
As for the defined 1.6 dying, you're assuming that no therapeutic solution exists.
The researchers estimated that more than 900,000 COVID-19 hospitalizations occurred through November 2020. Based on their model, 30% of these hospitalizations were attributable to obesity, 26% to hypertension, 21% to diabetes, and 12% to heart failure.
Coronavirus Disease 2019 Hospitalizations Attributable to Cardiometabolic Conditions in the United States: A Comparative Risk Assessment Analysis
So the number drops to .3 with getting people healthy. Would be nice to have the option to get/be healthy or take a jab.
originally posted by: puzzled2
a reply to: ScepticScot
As has been shown in multiple studies using proper statistical analysis as opposed to uninformed speculation on a conspiracy site.
Which you provide no link to leaving your comment just hearsay on a conspiracy site.
You also are changing the parameters to the counts - any unvaccinated case counts but only the serious cases & deaths are counted when vaccinated.
originally posted by: AaarghZombies
originally posted by: puzzled2
a reply to: AaarghZombies
Wouldn't a fat passport be serving the same outcome as a vaxx passport - create fewer serious cases & deaths.
But there are no profits in healthy people.
As for the defined 1.6 dying, you're assuming that no therapeutic solution exists.
The researchers estimated that more than 900,000 COVID-19 hospitalizations occurred through November 2020. Based on their model, 30% of these hospitalizations were attributable to obesity, 26% to hypertension, 21% to diabetes, and 12% to heart failure.
Coronavirus Disease 2019 Hospitalizations Attributable to Cardiometabolic Conditions in the United States: A Comparative Risk Assessment Analysis
So the number drops to .3 with getting people healthy. Would be nice to have the option to get/be healthy or take a jab.
1 percent, 1.6 percent, it's still hundreds of thousands of people.
originally posted by: DanZoller
originally posted by: AaarghZombies
originally posted by: puzzled2
a reply to: AaarghZombies
Wouldn't a fat passport be serving the same outcome as a vaxx passport - create fewer serious cases & deaths.
But there are no profits in healthy people.
As for the defined 1.6 dying, you're assuming that no therapeutic solution exists.
The researchers estimated that more than 900,000 COVID-19 hospitalizations occurred through November 2020. Based on their model, 30% of these hospitalizations were attributable to obesity, 26% to hypertension, 21% to diabetes, and 12% to heart failure.
Coronavirus Disease 2019 Hospitalizations Attributable to Cardiometabolic Conditions in the United States: A Comparative Risk Assessment Analysis
So the number drops to .3 with getting people healthy. Would be nice to have the option to get/be healthy or take a jab.
1 percent, 1.6 percent, it's still hundreds of thousands of people.
There is a a study that says about 0.3% infection fatality rate last year, which is no doubt much less now with ongoing virus weakening and increasing natural immunity.
originally posted by: AaarghZombies
originally posted by: DanZoller
originally posted by: AaarghZombies
originally posted by: puzzled2
a reply to: AaarghZombies
Wouldn't a fat passport be serving the same outcome as a vaxx passport - create fewer serious cases & deaths.
But there are no profits in healthy people.
As for the defined 1.6 dying, you're assuming that no therapeutic solution exists.
The researchers estimated that more than 900,000 COVID-19 hospitalizations occurred through November 2020. Based on their model, 30% of these hospitalizations were attributable to obesity, 26% to hypertension, 21% to diabetes, and 12% to heart failure.
Coronavirus Disease 2019 Hospitalizations Attributable to Cardiometabolic Conditions in the United States: A Comparative Risk Assessment Analysis
So the number drops to .3 with getting people healthy. Would be nice to have the option to get/be healthy or take a jab.
1 percent, 1.6 percent, it's still hundreds of thousands of people.
There is a a study that says about 0.3% infection fatality rate last year, which is no doubt much less now with ongoing virus weakening and increasing natural immunity.
I've included links to my sources for 1.6 percent in my signature, you haven't even named the study let alone linked to it.
Most countries seem to be hovering between 1.6 percent and 3.2 percent.
I think that the higher figure is more due to some country's having serious issues with poverty and a lack of affordable health care rather than anything to do with Covid.
The US and UK both report around 1.6 Percent.
originally posted by: DanZoller
a reply to: ScepticScot
They had antibody testing done in the UK back in summer which shows 94% of Brits were positive for antibodies at that time. That number is way higher now, probably 96 or 97 percent.I suppose most people who get covid never develop symptoms so they never tested.