It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: MotherMayEye
Here's an interesting video showing lab antibody tests after the first and second jabs. This was just a single patient though, so it would be nice if doctors were routinely doing these lab tests. If similar effects are happening to many vaxxed people, then this is a nightmare scenario.
To summarize, he began by showing the patient's pre-jab labs which were normal:
- After the first jab, CD8 cells came back high (lymphocytes). These are the killer T cells.
- After the second jab...
• Granulocytes were high meaning the patient's immune system was responding to tissue damage.
• Lymphocytes (including CD8 and Natural Killer) cells were low -- leaving the patient vulnerable to 'breakthrough' infections.
• CD3-/CD56+CD16+(Natural Killer) cells were low -- they are first responders to viral infections and cancer cells.
All other immune lab scores came back on the lower end of normal, too, after the second jab.
IOW, the patient's adaptive immune system "tanked." This doctor said the patient's lab results point to an auto-immune disorder they did not have prior to the jabs.
originally posted by: Justoneman
Because you share them with us.
What else can you add?
originally posted by: MotherMayEye
He understands what he found is not enough to draw conclusions beyond that one patient and was basically pleading for other doctors to run immune labs, too.
originally posted by: MotherMayEye
Your lymphocytes should not be low if you have an infection.
originally posted by: yeti101
1. so why were comments disabled on the original youtube video?
in my experience people who dont want dissenting or factual voices who debunk them turn comments off. Big red flag straight away.
2. dude touts himself as a doctor. Wouldnt it be nice if he was an MD in virology or some other topic related to disease? sorry he's not a doctor. he's a chiropractor. theyre regarded as quacks and charlatans to the point the NHS in the UK will not refer you to one. You can get referred to an osteopath but not a chiropractor on the NHS. Chiros claim they can cure the common cold with SM ( spinal manipulation) theres zero evidence for this but they keep saying it. Theyre also renowned for emptying you bank account
3. the content of the video itself is dubious. Many questions spring to mind. Are these results normal after a vaccine ? we dont know as he doesnt provide another example. Theres no follow up tests days or weeks later. He has a sample size of one! he does not submit his "discoveries" to a scientific journal for peer review, why not?
my conclusion is he's an unreliable source who hasnt done the proper research and his video means zero . you are free to believe in anything you want.
Granulocytes are a type of white blood cell that has small granules. These granules contain proteins. The specific types of granulocytes are neutrophils, eosinophils, and basophils.
Granulocytes, specifically neutrophils, help the body fight bacterial infections.
originally posted by: yeti101
1. so why were comments disabled on the original youtube video?
in my experience people who dont want dissenting or factual voices who debunk them turn comments off. Big red flag straight away.
2. dude touts himself as a doctor. Wouldnt it be nice if he was an MD in virology or some other topic related to disease? sorry he's not a doctor. he's a chiropractor. theyre regarded as quacks and charlatans to the point the NHS in the UK will not refer you to one. You can get referred to an osteopath but not a chiropractor on the NHS. Chiros claim they can cure the common cold with SM ( spinal manipulation) theres zero evidence for this but they keep saying it. Theyre also renowned for emptying you bank account
3. the content of the video itself is dubious. Many questions spring to mind. Are these results normal after a vaccine ? we dont know as he doesnt provide another example. Theres no follow up tests days or weeks later. He has a sample size of one! he does not submit his "discoveries" to a scientific journal for peer review, why not?
my conclusion is he's an unreliable source who hasnt done the proper research and his video means zero . you are free to believe in anything you want.