It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Dr. Thompson is a graduate of Elmhurst College where he completed his degree in sportsmedicine and athletic training with highest honors, and a graduate of the prestigious Palmer College of Chiropractic where he earned the President's Scholar for academic excellence.
originally posted by: Itisnowagain
Let's all hope and pray that it was simply due to a stress response like you claim.
originally posted by: TrollMagnet
a reply to: MotherMayEye
The conclusion of why they are ripe for breakthrough cases seems rather presumptive. I go with Darwin on this, not overly complex conclusions I need to make leaps to reach.
Here is the root of the breakthrough cases IMO.
If you introduce a variable to any organism in nature that make its survival difficult, it will change or die. Darwin called it evolution, but on a short time scale we see these changes individually as mutations. The best way to cause mutations is to introduce something that kills a pathogen, but not all of the pathogen. Like taking bacteria and growing it in a petri dish with antibiotic meds. It will mutate and eventually take over the antibiotics as a antibiotic resistant strain. Then you can get sick from the bacteria, even if you take that same antibiotic. These types of changes occur with everything in nature as far as we know, bacteria, viruses, mammals, reptiles, it does not matter. Darwin proved this.
So now you take a half baked vaccine that does not keep out 100% of the virus. So you have "less symptoms" with a lower viral load because the virus is having a hard time surviving in you. Then we start getting a bunch of mutations. Now COVID can spread much more easily at a lower viral load.
Seems to me the exact way the vaccine attacked COVID, is the exact way the new mutations of COVID have changed to combat those environmental changes and still survive, and spread at lower loads. If it did not become more infectious at lower viral loads, it would have died. So it evolved the way Darwin would have predicted. It also evolved the way many doctors and scientists predicted who are censored in 2020.
This is evolution. My hypothesis follows the actual science of the past 100 years. If someone can prove this argument wrong because I missed something, go for it. Occam's Razor and Darwin seem to win this argument easily.
originally posted by: TrollMagnet
originally posted by: MDDoxs
originally posted by: MotherMayEye
a reply to: MDDoxs
By traveling down into your armpit where there are lymph nodes.
How does it travel to your armpit when injected in the shoulder?
The same way protein moves into the muscle when you workout and rink a protein shake?
Why for even a second would you think muscle is impermeable to processes inside the body?
The assumption should be the opposite.
originally posted by: Debunkology
There is no cure for Type 2 diabetes. It's an ongoing condition that patients have to manage.
Regardless. My main point was about stress.
originally posted by: MotherMayEye
a reply to: anonentity
I've also heard about dormant viruses waking up in vaccinated people and read personal stories to that effect.
If there is a myriad of potentially life-threatening adverse effects, it's going to be difficult to prove the vaccines are the cause.
originally posted by: anonentity
a reply to: Wide-Eyes
I had a thought why are the homeless and street dwellers exempt? could I suggest that their natural load of Germs and viruses would be off the charts, compared with the mouth gargling showered and preened averaged city dweller? and if they got the shot it might show up as euthanizing the homeless as their natural biome just engulfs them. If what we are seeing is that a vaccinated person's immune system gets progressively damaged by each shot. Then in a few more months, the unvaccinated could indeed be carrying a normal viral load, which could be bad news for an immune-compromised person. It does rather look like this conspiracy theory is turning into fact as the new data is revealed. Even this might be by a design who knows.
originally posted by: Itisnowagain
a reply to: daskakik
Would you go to your doctor and ask him to prove this doctor wrong by having the tests done?
It would help to put peoples mind at rest if you would.
originally posted by: ketsuko
My question would be if that was one patient. Are we seeing a snapshot of an ongoing process unrelated to the vaccine or caused by it? There's no way to know based on one case.
originally posted by: daskakik
originally posted by: Itisnowagain
Let's all hope and pray that it was simply due to a stress response like you claim.
I never actually said that is what it was, just that it is a possibility because we have no idea what he came across between jabs.
Also, as I mentioned in my response to Wide-Eyes, it could be a number of things. One thing is for sure, this doc doesn't seem to be interested in figuring out if it is something else. They just put this vid out there hinting that it could be the jab.
I mean, this is the kind of thing that could have made this person stress out but then again it could be something totally unrelated to the jab or stress.
originally posted by: Justoneman
You TM, are on fire for the truth. The blood vessels pass close enough to everything. Some people may have more porous vessels and capillaries than others. Maybe if the person has Hardening of the Arteries (Arteriosclerosis/Atherosclerosis) it makes it different or if you don't? There is so much data out there to study still on this matter.
originally posted by: TrollMagnet
originally posted by: MDDoxs
originally posted by: MotherMayEye
a reply to: MDDoxs
By traveling down into your armpit where there are lymph nodes.
How does it travel to your armpit when injected in the shoulder?
The same way protein moves into the muscle when you workout and rink a protein shake?
Why for even a second would you think muscle is impermeable to processes inside the body?
The assumption should be the opposite.