It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: TruthJava
a reply to: cosmickat
So Sean Hannity was client and said he wasn't. I am really starting to wonder about myself lately...I don't think it's illegal to have a lawyer now? I am sorry but I am still waiting to hear what was on the emails that had been on HRC's computer, yada yada and the whole story as to why she is still walking free. If Sean Hannity was covering that up, then I would be all for this investigation.
originally posted by: Bicent
Just a serious question....
Does anyone feel this story is a distraction from what the real stories are right now?
Just saying no need to respond or get intellectual.. just wondering...
Like for instance what is our strategy to fix our looming debt? Or North Korea or our bismall imigration problem, just asking, don’t misunderstand me from being a troll either.. just a serious question fellow members..
At your service,
Bic
Soros and Bolton, a health care consultant, will exchange vows in a small ceremony on Saturday morning at the Bedford, New York estate, which Soros bought in 2003 from “Jurassic Park” author Michael Crichton.
Kimba Wood, a federal judge, will perform the non-denominational ceremony, which will be attended by members of the couple’s families, including his five children, a source familiar with the arrangements told Reuters.
New York (CNN)A US judge said President Donald Trump's personal attorney Michael Cohen could review materials seized when the FBI raided his home, office and hotel room last week for any communications with the President, but held off on deciding how prosecutors will ultimately be able to use the evidence.
"I'm denying the motion for a (temporary restraining order) because it's currently moot. The government is not accessing anything," the judge declared. "With respect to a preliminary injunction, that, I think, is premature at this point. We have to wait and see what the volume is and how you can argue."
originally posted by: dawnstar
a reply to: howtonhawky
well, according to what hannity said, there probably isn't anything in that mass of material that will be of interest to anyone anyways!! the bulk of it probably deals with trump's business dealings.
originally posted by: Dfairlite
a reply to: carewemust
Fire hannity because he talked with a lawyer? LOL they're ridiculous.
originally posted by: mzinga
a reply to: Dfairlite
Wow, if the tables were turned and this was Maddow and Obama you all would be crying about freedom of the press and getting fed news because Obama was paying for it through his 'lawyer'.
Come now hypocrites see this for what it is. On the surface it is nothing, below the surface it says everything. Also stop trying to 'party' this. This transcends political parties and if you think that either of the Clintons didn't have media spouting for them you have totally denied ignorance. In this case it is just getting shoved into our face.
originally posted by: JDmOKI
originally posted by: mzinga
a reply to: Dfairlite
Wow, if the tables were turned and this was Maddow and Obama you all would be crying about freedom of the press and getting fed news because Obama was paying for it through his 'lawyer'.
Come now hypocrites see this for what it is. On the surface it is nothing, below the surface it says everything. Also stop trying to 'party' this. This transcends political parties and if you think that either of the Clintons didn't have media spouting for them you have totally denied ignorance. In this case it is just getting shoved into our face.
It's common knowledge that the media had a love affair with Obama and its well documented the guy is seen as a Saint that could do no wrong while spying on allies, numerous drone strikes, toppling legit governments, proxy wars etc.
But the perfect president
originally posted by: JDmOKI
originally posted by: Dfairlite
a reply to: carewemust
Fire hannity because he talked with a lawyer? LOL they're ridiculous.
I don't get why I should care that Hannity sought legal advice from a lawyer to the president of the United States. I mean the guy was respected enough to be a lawyer to a president why wouldn't he seek his advice or even hire him.
I just don't understand the crime or big deal. I've sought advice from a lawyer without hiring them.
I just feel like this is the democrats tactics of whatever needed to take down trump and also distract us for another 3 years over petty nonsense
originally posted by: JDmOKI
originally posted by: Dfairlite
a reply to: carewemust
Fire hannity because he talked with a lawyer? LOL they're ridiculous.
I don't get why I should care that Hannity sought legal advice from a lawyer to the president of the United States. I mean the guy was respected enough to be a lawyer to a president why wouldn't he seek his advice or even hire him.
I just don't understand the crime or big deal. I've sought advice from a lawyer without hiring them.
I just feel like this is the democrats tactics of whatever needed to take down trump and also distract us for another 3 years over petty nonsense
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: JDmOKI
originally posted by: mzinga
a reply to: Dfairlite
Wow, if the tables were turned and this was Maddow and Obama you all would be crying about freedom of the press and getting fed news because Obama was paying for it through his 'lawyer'.
Come now hypocrites see this for what it is. On the surface it is nothing, below the surface it says everything. Also stop trying to 'party' this. This transcends political parties and if you think that either of the Clintons didn't have media spouting for them you have totally denied ignorance. In this case it is just getting shoved into our face.
It's common knowledge that the media had a love affair with Obama and its well documented the guy is seen as a Saint that could do no wrong while spying on allies, numerous drone strikes, toppling legit governments, proxy wars etc.
But the perfect president
Ok. But did Obama have a high-profile member of the media, that acted as his number one apologist and defender, take free legal advice (or paid advice...Hannity has said both) from Obama's personal lawyer, while that media member was reporting on an investigation Obama was a potential target of and dismissing the entire investigation as a conspiracy against the president?
This seems to be a very unique situation that I have not seen comparable to what we have seen in the past.