It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: mirageman
a reply to: GovernmentSauce
Forgive me if I've missed something in the thread already stated, but are there any official records to show their involvement? Iirc the MoD were pushed to reveal documents on the matter, which stated that the incident related to (only) US personnel?
Yes there is a Suffolk Police file on the case : PDF
The file confirms contact with Bentwaters and also that a visit was made in the early hours of the 26th Dec 1980 with a subsequent visit to a possible landing site around 10:30am. Although the officer attending was far from impressed.
Also the police report also says no documented evidence shows officers were present between 27th -31st Dec 1980.
Georgina Bruni did a bit more digging on this for her book and tracked down Officer Brian Cresswell who other officers thought may have been present on a later night. However when she contacted him by phone she received a terse response.
I know what I saw, I know what I did and I'm not giving you any information.
If you wish you can see the pages of Bruni's book (courtesy of Google Books) concerning this matter : [url=http://www.tinyurl.com/qhtcawe]Link
watch it to the end, some of the gems are there...
originally posted by: ctj83
a reply to: Baablacksheep
I simply don't want to cause issues to John. Both John and Jim have suffered as a result of UAP radiation exposure during the RFI.
In what way could you cause John an issue, are you able to explain please?
Since 2005 Dr Green has been running a study / care group for those suffering from UAP exposure. Just over 100 people who do not suffer from pathologies or delusions but do show biological markers if that exposure.
Can you link the study/care group ?
In essence, Jim refused the treatment. John accepted. Part of this agreement is to not look into things more and not to talk about the group.
Were is the information on this "agreement" you mention and the group?
25% of group do not live more than 5-7 years
In Jim and Johns case they have exceeded this by a lot of years and would not
be part of the above group then.
edit on 1-5-2017 by Baablacksheep because: (no reason given)